是时候结束澳本聪对比特币开发者的骚扰活动了

The translator of the original title of Wen chief law officer claimed to be Satoshi Nakamoto in Aomoto Satoshi and used legal proceedings to threaten the core developers of Bitcoin to force them to leave the technical maintenance work of Bitcoin for many years. After many years, the industry finally decided to fight back and set up an alliance cryptocurrency open patent alliance and went to court with Aomoto Satoshi. chief law officer, a member of the alliance at the beginning of the month, published this propaganda article to briefly explain to the public why. To fight against Aobencong, note that Aobencong is a nickname given by the Chinese community. Because it came from Australia and claimed to be Satoshi Nakamoto, it was named Aobencong. In the hard fork of the year, it was named as Satoshi Nakamoto's deity, which attracted countless people to enter the game and earned a lot of money. Subtitle Aobencong has repeatedly filed lawsuits against people who questioned that he is Satoshi Nakamoto, and in the process, it has harmed countless cryptocurrency practitioners. The Open Patent Alliance for Cryptographic Currency will file a lawsuit in court to stop this behavior. Satoshi Aomoto claims to be the mysterious creator of Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto. He is not, but he is not intimidated by this basic fact. He used his strong financial support to file endless unfounded lawsuits against cryptocurrency developers based on this lie. Many of them can't even afford the most basic defense. This is completely contrary to the vision of the Satoshi Nakamoto White Paper in 2006. This is a consumption of talents and spirit of the entire cryptocurrency economy. The success of the cryptocurrency industry three years ago must be stopped immediately. Members gathered together to set up the cryptocurrency Open Patent Alliance, which is a tool to share cryptocurrency innovation openly and to protect each other from false intellectual property infringement claims. This infringement claim troubled many science and technology industries and soon realized that Aobencong's litigation activities were a tax on the development of cryptocurrency, and the participants he targeted could not fight back alone. Therefore, he filed his own lawsuit on, and asked the court to declare once and for all that Aobencong was not from Satoshi Nakamoto next week. The trial of this case will finally begin on April, but the significance of this trial goes far beyond debunking Satoshi Aomoto's delusion. He is committed to fighting bullies like Satoshi Aomoto. His intention is to hunt down every developer personally until they are bankrupt and poor. It is time to end his activities directed at the heart of our industry and clarify that Satoshi Aomoto is not Satoshi Nakamoto, so he cannot use false intellectual property claims to hinder progress. The true spirit of Bitcoin white paper and open source code should have prevailed a long time ago. Over the years, Aomoto Satoshi has been using litigation as a weapon to crack down on anyone who doubts his Satoshi Nakamoto claims. Through a lot of lawsuits and anxious litigation strategies, he tried to economically consume and mentally torture his opponents, including the entire bitcoin developer community. Many of them have contributed to the development of the bitcoin ecosystem, but never expected any economic return. Aomoto Satoshi's harassment behavior is not limited to court cases, but he also opened to the public. The sender threatened to use the legal system to destroy their lives and the safety and livelihood of their families. Hard-working individuals were also forced to give up important bitcoin development work because they had reason to worry about lawsuits that they were unable to fight or that they and their relatives were deeply hurt under the coercion of Aomoto Satoshi, who lacked evidence to try forgery and fraud. Although Aomoto Satoshi publicized his ideas with great fanfare, he repeatedly failed to take the post even if he was questioned in the lawsuit. Why did he support the real documents he claimed? He repeatedly provided forged documents to the court. He failed to fulfill his promise, such as signing the transaction with Satoshi Nakamoto's key. In other cases, he promised that he would call or someone to prove his statement, but he did not provide an unrelated person. Satoshi Aomoto claimed that he was Satoshi Nakamoto, which posed a potential threat to the existence of Bitcoin. If Satoshi Aomoto was really Satoshi Nakamoto, he could easily prove this without doubt, but he could not. The forged document library of Satoshi Aomoto was the next one. In fact, two experts hired by Aomoto Satoshi himself have admitted that many of Aomoto Satoshi's documents are forged. Next week, the court will begin to accuse Aomoto Satoshi of tampering, including a document with a wrong date. Many documents provided by Aomoto Satoshi as evidence have been tampered with. It looks like two false handwritten documents that existed before the publication of the Bitcoin white paper. Many handwritten documents as evidence by Aomoto Satoshi are written in pre-printed notebooks until these notebooks The real white paper shared by Satoshi Nakamoto in 1998 was fraudulently revised for many years before three versions of the white paper appeared. Many versions of the bitcoin white paper provided by Satoshi Aomoto for this lawsuit were deliberately revised to look like early drafts, but the metadata and fonts contained in it did not appear until 1998. A large number of emails provided by Satoshi Aomoto forged dates and tampered with sender and recipient information. In addition, the domain names used in these emails were not changed until many years after the date shown in the emails. Last month, when the evidence of the case began to pile up against his false accusations, Aomoto Satoshi said that he had just discovered a hard disk with evidence that he didn't start preparations until the year after the publication of the white paper. Last week, Aomoto Satoshi's own experts announced that the hard disk was forged, and some of the contents seemed to be generated by using it. Aomoto Satoshi claimed that he was Satoshi Nakamoto, which posed a potential threat to the existence of Bitcoin. If Aomoto Satoshi's claim won the bitcoin community. The basic part will come to a standstill. Those of us who care about the prospect of cryptocurrency and the urgency of updating the global financial system can't tolerate this situation. We must permanently stop Aomoto Satoshi from making such claims, threatening developers and companies with fraudulent intellectual property litigation, and consuming valuable time and resources needed by this application to build innovative products for the modern financial system. We are committed to carrying this lawsuit to the end, including members who understand that we who have resources must carry it out without hesitation. Fundamental Struggle In the last few days before the trial, we are very grateful to the court for paying serious attention to our case and carefully examining the evidence presented by both parties, which is testimony from Satoshi Aomoto. We are proud to lead this accusation today and tomorrow on behalf of developers and every participant in the cryptocurrency economy. We will not stop until developers get rid of the threat, consumption and fear, because fraudsters like Satoshi Aomoto have endless funds, which will have an impact on them and the development of the entire cryptocurrency industry. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=60945