Blur原班人马打造 一文告诉你Blast值得玩吗
作者： 陈剑Jason，独立研究员 来源：X（原推特）@jason_chen998
Blur推出了个“挖矿链”Blast，看了一圈主要的特点有两个，ETH质押挖矿和合约挖矿，有新意，但没创意，这两个我拆开和大家聊聊。 首先它主打了“可以帮您赚钱的Layer2”，其实就是用户将钱存进Blast这个Layer2中，然后Blast再拿着钱去到Layer1也就是以太坊里质押，并且是放在Lido中的，再将获得的利息还给用户美名其曰“帮您赚钱”，那这和用户直接自个去Lido有啥区别呢，会多赚到一些Blast积分，所以Blast充分的贯彻落实了blur的玩法。
我刚试着存了点钱进去，目前产品设计的还是非常粗糙的，都不显示我的余额，不知道存成功了没，我还得去链上检查钱的去向，现在存进去的钱要到明年2月份测试网上线后才可以再取回来，截止发稿前已经有1000个ETH被存进去了。
Blast采用这个策略核心是为了TVL，既然一时半会找不到什么好应用可以把用户拉进来玩，那我就先用质押的方式让用户先把钱存进来，先用本来的质押收益借花献佛美名其曰“帮您赚钱”，再给他们点积分吊吊胃口。 那再聊聊合约挖矿，这是我觉得相比于质押挖矿更有意思的，我在今年5月份写过一篇文章EIP6969的CSR协议，现在用户交的一笔Gas费会分为两部分，燃烧和给矿工，EIP6969则想再拿出来一部分给合约开发者，合情合理，即用户是为了去和某个开发者的合约做交互才支付了Gas，凭啥开发者没一分钱呢？
所以Blast两手抓，一手通过ETH质押的方式来在没有任何应用的前提下空手套白狼吸引TVL，从而另一手给开发者说“你看我这里有这么多钱，你还不赶紧来干活？”，再通过CSR让开发者也可以赚到收益。 最后说一下团队，首先是Blur的原班人马，最后那一段真的是玩足了语言文字的艺术，乍一看还以为这条链从Paradigm等机构融了2000万美金，实际上它说的是“Blast 的贡献者已从....筹集2000万美金”，仔细品味，它说的不是Blast，而是Blast的贡献者，也就是Pacman给blur融的钱也给算进Blast里了，但并不会都花给Blast，真正Blast融了多少钱不好说。
总结一下，如果你是用户，且本来你有一笔闲置的钱，相比于存到Lido中，确实存在Blast会多出一部分这条链潜在的积分空投，可以试试。 如果你是开发者，也可以多关注一下，毕竟它通过这种方式先把TVL撑起来了，再加上CSR协议可以让开发者获得更多一部分Gas收入。
Author Jian Chen, an independent researcher from the original Twitter, launched a mining chain and looked around. The main features are two pledge mining and contract mining, which are innovative but not creative. I'll take them apart and talk to you. First of all, it focuses on what can help you make money, that is, the user deposits the money in this one, and then takes it to the Ethereum to pledge it and put it in it, and then returns the obtained interest to the user in the name of helping you make money. What's the difference between this and the user going directly by himself? Therefore, I have just tried to deposit some money into the game. At present, the product design is still very rough, and it doesn't show my balance. I don't know if the deposit was successful. I still have to go to the chain to check the whereabouts of the money. The money I have deposited now can't be taken back until I test the online line next month. One of them has been deposited before the deadline for publication. The core of this strategy is to use the pledge method to let users play since I can't find any good applications for a while. Users deposit their money first, and then use the original pledge proceeds to lend flowers to the Buddha's reputation, saying that it will help you make money, and then give them some points to keep their appetite. Then talk about contract mining. This is an agreement that I think is more interesting than pledge mining. Now, a fee paid by users will be divided into two parts: burning and giving it to miners, and it is reasonable to give another part to contract developers, that is, users only pay for interacting with a developer's contract. Why don't developers get a point? What about money? So, with one hand, you can attract the white wolf with empty hands without any application, and with the other hand, you can tell the developer that you don't hurry to work because I have so much money here, and then you can make profits by letting the developer. Finally, let's talk about the team first. The last part of the team is really the art of playing enough language and writing. At first glance, I thought that this chain had melted US dollars from other institutions. In fact, it said yes. The contributor has carefully tasted it from raising US dollars. What you said is not the contributor, that is, the money given to Rong is also counted, but not all of it will be spent on the real amount of money. It is hard to say how much it is. To sum up, if you are a user and you originally have an idle sum of money, there will be more points in this chain than if you actually deposit it in China. You can try to airdrop the potential points. If you are a developer, you can also pay more attention to it. After all, it will be propped up first in this way, and the agreement will allow developers to get more income. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台
注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群
打开微信扫一扫
添加客服
进入交流群
1.本站遵循行业规范，任何转载的稿件都会明确标注作者和来源；2.本站的原创文章，请转载时务必注明文章作者和来源，不尊重原创的行为我们将追究责任；3.作者投稿可能会经我们编辑修改或补充。
