The world wide web used to be just like the world wide web, which is rich in open source decentralization protocols. Developers and engineers are at the forefront of this new field. With the passage of time, the success of social networks, cloud computing and other large-scale scientific and technological initiatives has changed the pattern, which is beneficial to a few existing enterprises. Their platforms have begun to provide services to most Internet users. It is easy to see how similar scripts will play a role in the world and will soon play a role in today's environment. At present, the identity of users has not been paid attention to by most mature enterprises. Most people associate it with speculative cryptocurrency. Ordinary people on the street may feel dizzy because their toes are immersed in water and burned, or they are relieved because they stay awake and don't lose money like some of their friends. Enterprises are investing in blockchain technology, but ordinary people don't care about this. The lack of demand makes large enterprises with relatively small industries invest in innovative measures. Financial technology companies are looking for ways to integrate with encrypted assets, but the market demand is not enough for technology companies to properly invest in this field. Google, Microsoft and DuDu have taken active measures, but they have taken a wait-and-see attitude instead of trying to greatly promote the development of this field like entrepreneurs in the field. Some early measures we have seen, such as Microsoft's blockchain as a service initiative on its cloud, have ended because the demand for such services on the cloud is not large enough for large organizations like Microsoft. It takes tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands of times to deploy cloud services, which is worthwhile for them. For startups and small companies, the situation is different. Tens of thousands of users can create lucrative businesses. This attitude is good for builders because it provides them with opportunities to create products without trying to compete directly with existing enterprises with abundant funds. However, there is a critical point in scale, which makes the platform change from an insignificant small enterprise to the potential of existing enterprises. Threats or competitors, these competitors were quickly acquired. Some examples I think of include Google's acquisition and acquisition and Amazon's acquisition and these purchases enable these companies to use key network technologies that are not developed internally to establish important market positions. These large companies have almost unlimited funds to acquire other companies. Only legislators can prevent these transactions from happening. Google, Amazon and products that are all World Wide Web, except Microsoft and Apple, which have successfully reinvented themselves. They are all in the absence of large network companies looking for acquisition opportunities, and the situation is different, because many large network technology companies will invest a lot of money to absorb successful upstarts whenever they have the opportunity. We have not yet seen this happen, partly because most companies that have gained great attention in the field are in the field of digital assets, and people think that some of them may be securities, and large technology companies are unlikely to acquire these cryptocurrencies. Companies, however, other parts of the landscape may become more attractive. Many infrastructure companies with sufficient scale to provide services for the industry may become natural acquisition targets for large technology companies. We have companies like and to provide cloud-like services to start and develop blockchain applications, and a large number of companies provide services to start blockchain networks and recent application chains, including and so on. Although it is not clear how much demand for application chains is at present, if they As widely as some people think, they may occupy an important position in the whole ecosystem. If they reach the threshold of having hundreds of thousands or even millions, it may become a catalyst to promote major cloud infrastructure providers to seek to provide their own services. I don't think they will stand by and ignore them in this case. They may buy some leading companies, especially when you consider that cloud providers are already responsible for supporting a large number of public blockchain infrastructures. Some companies may be decentralized purists, but it is doubtful that they are all so. After all, quitting is good for founders and investors. If it has the influence expected by many supporters, it is hard to imagine that such a script will not play a role in the future, especially with the economic environment, which is conducive to large enterprises with healthy balance sheets. These enterprises can obtain healthy risk-free returns through their capital. In the past year, we were in a historical low interest rate environment, which led venture capital companies to have cheap funds to invest in high-risk start-ups, and the funds available for start-ups were running out, which brought more difficulties to their success, which would make it more difficult to challenge the dominant position of large-scale technology companies to reach a critical scale. In this context, in order to prevent companies from absorbing protocols and applications, it is necessary to build them on a large scale and quickly reach a critical quality. A company established in this way is trying. We are unlikely to see the ecosystem developed through wallet and internet. Fortunately, the settlement track built for us, such as Ethereum, has successfully turned itself into an Internet-scale public utility and reached a scale that cannot be fully owned. It is not clear whether new infrastructure companies can do this. Those who wish to decentralize services will rely on unstable practical tokens and cryptocurrencies, which is a major obstacle to entering these areas. People do not want to use sub-infrastructure. It is an obstacle for many people to learn from history if we don't use better value storage means such as stable currency. It is important not to ignore that the first generation is very similar to the present, and there are many open and decentralized agreements. People have built amazing innovations on it. As time goes by, most of the contents of the network have abandoned many written agreements and been replaced by proprietary agreements and platforms, and they do have their own payment methods and token incentives. Measures and projects can be adopted. However, the initial network is not surrounded by well-funded companies. These companies are already Internet natives, and they also realize the value of such a platform's influence. In this respect, they are facing a more arduous challenge, that is, to be loyal to its origin. Undoubtedly, some core infrastructures, such as the larger blockchain network, have successfully established their position in this respect, but many upstarts who build services for these networks may find themselves absorbed by large technology companies in the next few years, which will lead to a landscape that looks not much different from our current one. This will not be a failure. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=62971