铭文Fomo潮之后 比特币生态该如何落地？

When the inscription tide swept through, I came into contact with some real bitcoin developers, and found that they wouldn't be so hot-headed as to say that some bitcoin subverted the Ethereum. On the contrary, everyone had a consensus that the bitcoin ecology would have a chance, but it would definitely be different from the stacked Lego combination paradigm of the Ethereum. Next, based on technical logic, I discussed how the bitcoin ecology should land. This new asset issuance method brought many people back to the moment of 2008, and their enthusiasm was completely ignited by this inscription craze. New users, new application scenarios, and new funds are added. To some extent, it is not too much to call this bull market a bitcoin bull. The side-chain lightning network and other directions are crowded with bitcoin orthodox covetous people. Every time they talk about bitcoin ecology, they say that they want to recreate everything in Ethereum, which is really an intracranial climax, just as the asset issuance fever is unsustainable. The inscription market is also eager to undertake a brand-new bitcoin craze at the end of the tide. It is only true that if you want to recreate Ethereum. For details, please refer to the top article on the home page. Bitcoin ecology needs to explore a landing route that conforms to its original characteristics. The core logic is that the original characteristics of Bitcoin chain have limited calculation and verification capabilities, even if the storage capacity in the address also has dust attacks. The limited calculation determines that more complex transaction logic must be realized outside the chain. For example, a diagram based on optimistic ideas is boldly conceived. The technical logic is also reasonable, but the workload is comparable to that of the Qin Dynasty in the three-body computer, which makes Bitcoin more suitable for asset settlement rather than global status verification. For example, the signature and data structure characteristics of Bitcoin nodes have brought some verification ability, but only the aggregation of multiple signatures is limited by multi-signature scenarios, allowing the creation of more complex scripts, but its dependent model can only do asset settlement and cannot achieve global status verification. Node matrix can only strengthen the interoperability between the side chain and the main chain, and improve the security and response speed of asset settlement. There is no doubt that bitcoin has developed into a minimalist route until now. This is the consensus that came out after the last round of large and small block wars. Therefore, the idea of trying to make a big fuss about the script space based on it will definitely not work. Although it may not necessarily go to the castrated bifurcation level, the upgrade protocols tend to compromise in the direction of small blocks, such as discarding large data packets and returning to the air. The limitations of optimization and application between the two platforms determine that the expansion scheme of Bitcoin is very different from that of Ethereum. The lack of data availability ability of Bitcoin in Ethereum is the calculation and verification ability of the main network for the data submitted on the second floor. Obviously, although Bitcoin can accept certain data, the main network does not have feasible and efficient calculation and verification ability. Therefore, Bitcoin is more like an indexer originally stored in a bulletin board block, which can only be used for bookkeeping and confirmation, which is bound to be tested. If there are multiple challenges, the accounting and verification ability will be further increased, and there will be confusion and errors in accounting logic. Bitcoin operability is limited. The second floor of Ethereum submits the status to the main network. The main network has a contract, which can cooperate with the second floor to carry out security mechanisms such as the day challenge time window and the escape cabin to ensure that the main network can protect the assets of users on the second floor under the premise of evil. Obviously, Bitcoin without the ability of smart contract does not exist. This layer of security guarantee users can only believe that Bitcoin will not. The security model of evil bitcoin is limited by the payment scenario, which is similar to the solution on the second floor of Ethereum. On the second floor, if each transaction is synchronized with the main network, it can be based on finding an absolute security model, but just like it can only be limited by the payment scenario, the bitcoin built based on the model also has this limitation. Generally, such a multi-state mechanism with complex smart contracts cannot rely solely on this security mechanism unless other bitcoin off-chain consensus is superimposed based on this technical logic. The narrative space of editing and recognizing Bitcoin is also extremely clear. Taking Bitcoin as the second floor of the settlement layer to build an independent consensus and provide a complete set of virtual machines and other types of ecological carrying capacity of Ethereum, but such a chain with strong comprehensive strength is tantamount to recreating an Ethereum execution chain. Many people don't know that Ethereum actually has a settlement chain, and the main chain of Ethereum we see can also be regarded as a chain. The reason why people have a weak perception of the settlement chain is that the core of the main network is interactive verification. If the authentication ability is only a settlement chain, the chain that handles a lot of calculation and verification operations will become the real main chain problem. Let's take Bitcoin as the settlement chain. Do other chains dare to call themselves the main chain? Does Bitcoin ecology allow such a consensus to exist? Paying with Bitcoin, including lightning network assets and client authentication, must provide security based on the bitcoin main network model, which actually limits the best landing application scenario in these directions, that is, paying lightning network to be a small smart circulation body. The verification is already very slippery and actually similar to the payment channel that is relatively more suitable for landing stable coins. If you want to superimpose more states on the client verification of the state channel, it is equivalent to adding more complicated verification logic to the original model. Naturally, some states that cannot be verified by the main network will be submitted to the main network, which is essentially dependent on the offline consensus. This kind of scheme may be feasible, but compared with the trading scenario controlled by the pure model, the security level of the above bitcoin ecology will also drop correspondingly. If it is pure, The bitcoin ecological orientation and other subsequent stable currency application consumption scenarios under the empowerment of bitcoin security consensus. If some off-chain consensus is allowed to be added outside the bitcoin main network consensus, it points to the client to verify such complex application scenarios that can realize complex smart contracts. If the bitcoin main network only makes settlement chains and reaches consensus independently outside the chain, all kinds of side chain alliance chain index chains and other schemes that can build their own consensus and strictly implement asset transparent settlement seem to be possible. If such bitcoin Turing calculation The verification scheme is really realized without changing the consensus cost of Bitcoin main network and being lower than the smart contract structure of Ethereum. In short, the impossible trinity contradiction of security decentralization and scalability is more intense on Bitcoin main network. The so-called Bitcoin orthodoxy may be a false proposition. In my opinion, if you choose orthodox consensus, you have to accept the expansion limitations. If you want to break through the limitations, don't use the banner of universal invincible consensus. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=61923