激进 or 稳定？一文盘点 BRC-20 升级争议风波

The ecological inscription of Bitcoin has been in the spotlight for most of the year, when everyone thought that the popularity of the inscription would come to an end. The core of the dispute can be summarized as whether to upgrade the version of the index and keep pace with the iteration. At present, the dispute has come to an initial end with the standard upgrade to the published version as of the completion of this paper. This paper will try to invest from the technical background, perspectives and motives of all parties. By combing the whole upgrade process from the perspective of users' observation and so on, we can get a glimpse of the process of the bitcoin community reaching a consensus, and review the technical background. What is the alternative token on the bitcoin chain? Compared with the protocol, the developer can carry out operations such as issuing coins and accounting based on this protocol. The relationship between the bitcoin chain and the three is that the meta-protocol is based on the construction and use protocol as a complete data availability layer and has an offline indexer to determine the status of the meta-protocol, and the meta-protocol is also based on the bit chain construction. The bit chain protocol is used as a complete data availability layer with an indexer under the chain to determine the status of the meta-protocol, so it is actually a meta-protocol to realize the financial behavior index mentioned in the mechanism called index for details. The index is based on the bit chain mechanism, because the tokens on the bit chain are different from the real tokens distinguished by contract addresses, but the transaction information recorded in the ledger in the remarks field is stored in text form in each block. The decentralized nature of the bit chain allows anyone to package and upload the contents of a block, and the remarks field information does not affect the validity of the block. Therefore, in order to maintain the information order, it is necessary to follow certain rules to collect these account book information and verify the process, that is, to index and execute the verification process. On the Ethernet, it is called a smart contract, which is an indexer. The indexer is a database that can read and register all transaction data, such as inspection. Which inscription is the first to deploy the name of a new token? The rules applied by indexers such as tracking the change of wallet balance and related transaction address data of forged tokens are the consensus reached by all parties concerned. The name of an upgrade agreement occurs on the block. The specific content is to update the agreement to the version. It is a routine but irregular update. The main content is to further enrich the protocol function. The page diagram version updates the content source. The page needs to update the content source. It should be noted that the content of this update is not directly related to the indexing problem. The source of this dispute is that the indexing results are inconsistent according to the different indexing standards generated by the version and may produce greater differences in the future version, and the new protocol standards have been frozen in these two contents. See the technical problems of problems and disputes. As mentioned above, although the technology of bit chain itself is no longer developed, as a meta-protocol itself, there will naturally be technical iterations and updates. The agreement and ecological development that affect it naturally include the proposal put forward by the founder of the agreement in January, which has come into effect in the chain. The content of the proposal is to standardize the index of the agreement and freeze the free translation, in order to maintain the stable operation of the agreement and avoid the unexpected impact on the technical standards and the operation of the agreement caused by blind iteration. In the previous month, it was found that inscriptions and agreements that can be indexed by versions are not indexed by versions. Because different markets adopt different versions of the agreement, some inscriptions are in the same place. Some markets can't be indexed correctly, which has caused the actual inscription number deviation. As for the agreement as a whole, this problem is that a larger version of the agreement may lead to exceeding the maximum supply and casting double flowers between the version differences of different markets. This kind of risk can not be ignored. The ecological problem is that the index of the agreement is parasitic on the agreement, and whether it should be upgraded with the agreement is a dilemma at this stage. On the one hand, the agreement is still updating and iterating rapidly, and more and more new features are added. The upgrade to the agreement, especially in the jubilee, will soon activate the original way of generating curse inscriptions in the block height, which means that the curse inscriptions that will be given negative numbers in the version agreement will be given positive numbers in the version agreement, which will make the numbering situation of subsequent new inscriptions greatly different. In addition, the magic revision agreement that uses the new features of the new version of the agreement has brought about performance optimization, and on the other hand, as an existing one, A large number of asset agreements with huge market value have been born, and it has naturally become the top priority to maintain stability in the development process. If the user's asset losses are caused by the pursuit of new features, it will undoubtedly cause great harm to the ecology. Therefore, under the double blessing of technical issues and ecological issues, there are differences among the parties who have the right to speak in the agreement. The core of the dispute can be summarized as whether to upgrade the version of the index and keep pace with the iteration. Packages strictly follow the upgrade decision to upgrade, which may lead to two sets of different index standards on the bitcoin chain and different accounting rules. The difference in accounting rules means that users may have different balances or account balances in different places, which will make the market fragmented due to different version index standards. In addition, black and white modules have been introduced. System developers can introduce new functions in the black module, and tokens can be placed in the black module, but until. It can only be taken out after it is approved to be whitened. It is also hoped that this module will provide convenience for users and further standardize the market attitude towards other agreements that have not been upgraded. Although it is separated, it does not mean that it is the same as the same fork. According to the official explanation, this allows two different sets of standards to run in two different ecosystems at the same time, but the contents such as token book information can also interact freely, but compared with repeated references to technical iterations, it does not explain how to deal with market confusion. Risks such as chaos and double flower attack, etc. The founder temporarily freezes the focus test. Although he has put forward a proposal that will be frozen before, and this proposal has also come into effect, he also recognizes the technical problems and risks and is open to the upgrade. However, considering the stability and risk prevention, he opposes directly following the upgrade, but hopes that the current indexers will continue to freeze the future version in the background at the same time, not only fully testing the future version, but also decide which future version to use for the specific upgrade and whether to continue to freeze a few radicals to directly divide the two parties against it. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=61420