IOSG Ventures 研究员：我对 EigenLayer 的4点看法

There has been a lot of discussion about the author's source recently. We have written a series of introduction and articles in contact with the team since June. I will share my views on this tweet. The market demand and supply of Ethereum encryption is very strong. At present, there are nearly 30 million pieces pledged in Ethereum, which constitute the trust and security base of the whole Ethereum ecology. It is conservatively assumed that only the pledged Ethereum can provide hundreds of millions of dollars of encryption for middleware projects. Economic security In the ecology of Ethereum, some middleware services, such as Oracle, can't directly guide the trust network with the help of the consensus and security needs of Ethereum. Usually, the project party operates first, and then introduces token incentives to attract participants to gradually realize decentralization. There are at least two difficulties in this way. First, the introduction of incentive mechanism requires additional costs, the opportunity cost for participants to buy tokens to participate in pledge, and the operating cost for the project party to maintain the value of tokens. Second, even if the above costs are paid. And a decentralized network is built, and how its security lasts is still unknown. For start-up projects, these two points are particularly difficult. Let the existing Ethereum pledgers re-pledge, thus providing economic security for these middleware. If these re-pledgers work honestly, they will be rewarded. If they do evil, the original Ethereum pledge exposure will be confiscated. The advantage of this is that one of the project parties does not need to guide the new trust network by themselves, but outsource it to the Ethereum verifier as much as possible. Secondly, the economic security of the set of verifiers in Ethereum is very firm, which ensures the security to a certain extent. It is a super connector that connects the infrastructure middleware and the three major sectors at the same time. Recently, the deposit ceiling has been raised, which has ignited the enthusiasm of many projects. For the pledge, it can provide them with additional benefits in the future. For the middleware project, it can help them to start the network quickly, and even if they issue their own tokens later, they can switch to be driven by their own tokens. As a security service provider, it can be based on the construction of various derivatives, which is the first exploration version of the expansion solution under the Ethereum. If we read some technical solutions proposed, it is easy to find that these two services are similar to the youth version of the design of the Ethereum protocol layer. This is because they are solutions that can be introduced to the market faster than the protocol layer, and keep pace with what Ethereum will do in the future, and by involving some Ethereum verifiers. The article on whether or not to overload the consensus of Ethereum to a certain extent is criticized by most people. The author thinks that this is a reminder or warning to maintain social consensus. The focus is on social consensus rather than the denial of right. In the infancy of Ethereum, the attack incident caused great controversy, and the community had a heated discussion on whether or not to be hard-forked. Nowadays, the ecology of Ethereum has already carried a huge application, so it is necessary to avoid causing great differences in the community and maintain social consensus. The consistency is very important. Today's total is more than 10 billion dollars. If there is a huge problem involved, if the community proposes to implement a hard fork to roll back the state at this time, it will inevitably cause great controversy. Assuming that you and I have a lot of money on it, how will we choose to get back the money or fear the unbreakable nature of the blockchain? The point I want to say is that the project built on Ethereum should properly control risks, and we should not try to win over the social consensus of Ethereum to carry out the life and death of the project with Ethereum. In the discussion of strong binding regression, the key point of risk management is to define the objective penalty rules that can be checked and attributed on the chain to avoid differences, such as double signing the block in the Ethereum and signing the invalid block in another chain in the cross-chain bridge based on light nodes, which are clear penalty rules. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=61226