SAGA经济模型解析：通往可负担区块之路

The essence of the author-researcher source business model is to distribute the block space to the downstream demanders. One of the key issues involved is how to price the block space. A unique music chair pricing is used to make assumptions. In the initial state, there is a verifier who wants to choose one of them for entrusted verification. First, a certain number of verifiers are selected according to the pledge rate to enter the bidding process. For example, the verifiers ranked first and second will be eliminated, and then the verifiers will make quotations, and the quotations will be sorted from low to high. Choose one of them as the entrusted verifier, and at the same time, the price is determined according to the number of the highest price among the verifiers. The verifier is eliminated, and the remaining verifier is shortlisted and agrees to price in US dollars. This mechanism seems very complicated, but it can achieve a goal of providing the cheapest block space through the involution or effective pricing. Take the above case as an example. If the verifier wants to get the reward, he must ensure that his pledge amount is sufficient before entering the first step. This is somewhat similar to the past, where there is a significant difference between the first place and the first place in the super node. The second step is to substitute the quotation into a single node perspective. The final order price of the quotation and the quotation dollar is US dollars, but the US dollar needs to risk being eliminated, so the low price is quoted as much as possible, but gradually most verifiers will find that this is endless, and the price of involution is gradually getting cheaper. Therefore, if the cost of the verifier, including the opportunity cost of tokens, is considered, it is more prudent to quote a slightly higher price. Because of the price of its own cost, the pricing will be close to the cost in the actual process, and a small amount of profit will be in a very low range in the long run. In this process, high-cost verifiers will be eliminated continuously. As can be seen from the table below, Cancun is much cheaper after upgrading, but it is still not cheap enough, especially from a technical point of view, we need such security, but from a commercial point of view, large-scale application can not afford the transaction cost of pens, so the extremely low and stable cost is very meaningful. The mode is also different from other public chains. Users don't need to pay the network fees directly. Applications can decide their own charging methods, such as subscription system, buyout system, advertising fees or even completely free. This is more in line with the business model convention, which provides more flexibility. Another interesting thing is that there are hundreds of agreements on the incentive test network at present. As of March, the plan includes six projects. Some of these projects are games, and the related projects are entertainment. This data is also more consistent with the economic model. Adding a scene suitable for light assets, high number of users and high frequency of users, the last thing we need to pay attention to is that token distribution is airdropped according to the published information, and the share of ecosystem and foundation can be basically ignored. The total amount of airdrops is only distributed, and it is very likely that there will be many rounds in the future. Considering that there are hundreds of projects on the incentive test network that may issue coins, it is still worth continuing to participate, especially the pledge details. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=59230