对 Web3 游戏设计理念的一些思考

I think it's a change in the game paradigm. Although I'm not the only one who thinks so, not many of us have spent many years making games professionally. Why are experienced game developers so skeptical? Part of the reason is that its benefits are not obvious, and to be honest, it's often over-advertised, and it's hard to land. The development speed of the blockchain world is incredible. Few people are good at explaining what it actually brings to game design. So why do I think this is a similar one? The great transformation of online multiplayer games or free mobile games? Here are some ideas that caught my attention in the early days. A fundamental difference between interoperability and games is that in games, the ownership of game assets is recorded in the blockchain instead of in a closed centralized database controlled by the game manufacturer. It allows players to buy and sell assets. It also allows other games to see which game assets players have. Interoperability refers to the idea of using the assets of one game in another game. The second one. The game doesn't have to be made by the same person or even requested by the first person. In fact, I don't think this means that the gun in the game can be used in the game, but the idea can be used in a more creative way. Players can now choose the way they like to play more games or complete the level in the game. The game is to place a mining game. The game is a tower defense game game. The way to power the tower is to use the iridium game in the mining game to decide to double the idle return. The method is to accept the stars won by completing the level in the game. Anyone who plays the game can now choose the way they like. By playing more games or completing the level in the game, two games will start until one of them decides to cut off the power supply. It creates a richer game because there are now multiple game cycles and multiple choices for players to choose from. This example describes a pair of games, but there is no reason why they can't operate with each other, except that it is an interesting idea for the game mechanism. Besides, it is also a great user acquisition tool, which allows players who have invested in one game to use the investment in another game. Our game uses interoperability, and we take the output of other games as a game block. By using these combinations, players can make progress in the game, and what we win in the game can also be used in other people's games. The original left can be used in the game and our right can be won by playing the game. The combination is great. Most blockchain games only keep their game assets on the chain, which is a good use case, but it misses some opportunities provided by building game logic on the chain. By putting game logic on the chain, others can freely build on the game without permission. The obvious first step is that the robot can freely interact with the game logic without using the game interface because the game logic is on the chain. The robot has a bad reputation but designs an expected robot. The game is possible. In our first game, we have fought between humans and robots, which is very interesting for participants. Robots have a bad reputation, but after designing a robot that expects robots to appear, some more interesting ideas have emerged. Anyone can write a dashboard to track the price of resources in the game. They can build a market for game assets. They can create a pool of guild resources and optimize their use. They can decide to abandon the game manufacturer's game client and build a mobile version. They can freely sell it in the app store if their rights permit. Justin Gribert calls it customer agnosticism. Otherwise, it is an unknown field. If the game rules are stored in the chain, other game makers can build their own games on it, just like building on Warcraft while observing the underlying game rules. By token, the economy is controlled by smart contracts. The library can encourage the composability of these new games through the business model of grant and token distribution. The best example of the game is the dark forest, which has emerged many new gameplay by encouraging builders to build on it. The selected plug-ins from the dark forest do not need permission. One of my favorite games is StarCraft. If I want to make a game in the StarCraft universe, I must know who to call Blizzard and have enough credibility so that they can answer the phone and sign a confidentiality agreement. If all goes well, please hire a group of lawyers to make a business agreement, and then I need to take the time to ensure that we abide by the art Bible and keep consistent with the norms. If the game is directly related to StarCraft, I will have a continuous dialogue between them to discuss the nature of the norms and encourage them not to change it. No one needs to ask anyone's permission to break all this, because the smart contract can be used without permission. No one needs to ask anyone's permission. License This influences the game design by allowing developers to create an organic movie universe around the game, especially if the original works follow the agreement, that is, free knowledge sharing, which is becoming a project. In fact, the strict control in the sense is making way for the projects affected by the community. Zero knowledge sharing encourages others to develop on the basis of your works, and encourages players to launch their partner plan in 2008, which distributes the advertising revenue to the creators of popular content according to the results. Let the creators try their best to make videos that can attract those who please the audience. It creates a perfect symbiotic relationship between consumers, content creators and themselves. It turns out that economic motives have brought boosters that other companies can't catch up with. I certainly prefer to give money to players instead of spending it on effect marketing, so that tokens can flow through the vault and then flow to players according to set standards, which gives game designers a chance to motivate them to hope to see. This may be the behavior of players creating content entertainment for other players, managing them to do hard work, community work or anything that game makers think may be valuable. I hope this idea can be extended to marketing to give players the motivation to do something to attract more players to participate. Of course, I prefer to give players money instead of spending it on effect marketing. As a meta-game, when the income comes from the game, it usually does not enter the bank account of the game manufacturer, but enters the vault of the game, where some tokens are distributed to the game makers, some to the players, some to the community and some to the liquidity. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=55412