积分：加密生态参与的催化剂

As an incentive mechanism, the author compiles the translator's reading guide integral system, which can promote the interaction between users and the agreement, thus promoting the development and growth of the agreement. It is a tool rather than a target integral. It should not be the only reason for users to use the product. At the same time, users need clear and predictable rules to understand how to obtain the integral, while the integral on the chain can avoid the black box problem of the traditional integral system. As a method to realize the integral system on the chain, it provides a way to save money. Cost-effective way, it not only ensures the speed and flexibility of operation, but also ensures the verifiability and security of data by performing logical operations under the chain and then pushing the verification results to the chain. This not only provides a new tool for developers, but also provides a new way of thinking for the entire encryption ecosystem, that is, how to apply technological innovation to improve user participation and incentive mechanism. Recently, integral has quickly become a catalyst to promote user participation in the encryption ecosystem, leading many. The concept of the successful practice of top teams and agreements is not complicated. Users interact with them by promoting the development of agreements, so as to get rewards in the form of points. This mechanism is similar to the common experience value system in many video games. Players will continue to accumulate experience values to improve their rankings, which will encourage players to continue to strive for higher rankings. Many agreements use points as a prelude to the introduction of agreements to govern tokens, indicating that the distribution of tokens will be based on users' accumulation. This strategy has won valuable time for the agreement and the team before publishing the details of the token, and also delayed the review they face when they make mistakes. The operation mode of point accumulation is similar to that of income farming, but there is no direct economic incentive, but it provides a wider way for users to participate and reward. Now it has become a new trend to use points to motivate users and promote the development of the agreement. Interestingly, in theory, the supply of points can be unlimited, which is a tradition. The airdrop mechanism has brought new changes to distinguish it from the actual tokens. The problem of integral should not be understood as the matching degree of integral market. If a product can't win the favor of users without integral system, it is useless to add integral system on it and call it integral. It should not be the key factor to decide whether users choose products or products, but products and all of them can provide intrinsic value for users. Another important problem is that most integral systems are black boxes with time. Over time, their computational properties are unpredictable. This opacity has advantages and disadvantages. It means that it gives the team more flexibility to adjust the rules of the system, while the disadvantage is that it also deprives users of the perceived control or influence. The rules for acquiring experience values, that is, points, should be clear and predictable. If the points system is auditable, transparent and predictable, and at the same time, it can maintain enough flexibility for the team to design various activities around it. What will happen? Now the integral system is an attractive idea, but it should not be just a cover for creating another token. There was an agreement to launch a pre-issued token and promised to eventually convert it into another token. In essence, it is an integral in disguise. As a result, the ecosystem is filled with unnecessary tokens, and the integral on the chain is imagined as a different existence from the token. Through the combination of the integral system, users can create a unique experience. However, it is possible to track the integral on the chain at both the level. The system needs high cost, which leads to a very critical question, why not directly use tokens to represent the integral? This situation highlights why the on-chain integral system is an ideal choice for development, and deeply studies the problems faced by the existing integral system infrastructure. The team has carried out internal research sprint all night, and finally developed a special virtual machine to track and manage the agreement's integral quick entry end-to-end workflow, which is essentially a state machine. Perform specific logical operations under the chain, and then outsource the verification to a verification layer called "verification layer" which is responsible for verifying the status update and submitting the calculation data to the chain. The state machine has a defined state form and will be initialized according to a set of initial conditions to determine the initial state of the state machine. The state machine contains a set of actions that can be understood as transaction types. When called, these actions will trigger the state transition function on the state machine, which is responsible for performing calculations and updating the state of the state machine. After the execution, these actions will be packaged into a block and sent to the end. It will be pessimistically assumed that there may be errors in the calculation results or malicious tampering. The actions in the block will be re-executed to ensure the correctness of the results. The metadata for the verified block will be settled on the sum, and the updated state will be sent to the verified block. The metadata and updated state root will be placed in the upper part. So why is the working principle integral system of the framework formed by the above processes particularly suitable? The integration system provides a fast, flexible and self-managed execution environment, which ensures that the distribution of integration will not generate overhead on the chain and all state updates can occur as soon as possible. Although it supports verifiable offline calculation, the framework can still ensure that any data that enters the system and changes its state can be fully verified before the data is settled, which ensures that the system operates in a predictable way and will not be tampered with, so that the state can be audited once the state machine is deployed. The series can't be changed, which provides a guarantee for users to be sure that the rules of the system will not be modified by the provider at will, and can be settled directly on the website. Because the settlement status certificate can be directly used in the contract, the verification layer can greatly shorten the settlement period and build the exploration journey of the integral system by providing the pre-settlement guarantee. Disclaimer: This demonstration only shows the function of the framework, which is an unoptimized version and is not suitable for the production environment. This content is understood as an illustrative example rather than a final product. It is very important to conceive logic in the form of a state machine when developing, which requires careful consideration, that is, the data it will save and the action that determines behavior. This function will operate on the state from the perspective of the state machine, think about the application construction from the perspective of the state machine, and adhere to the above concept. The state design that we use the development toolkit to start designing will trigger when users perform off-chain or on-chain actions on the platform. The administrator can also assign event points to users. The state machine stored under the chain contains a time and number of events that will trigger. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=54130