关于Layerzero的女巫检举
Layerzero：呼吁加密生态清除“女巫”行为，倡导正当参与
近日，知名跨链项目Layerzero发布重要声明，敦促自称“女巫”的用户自觉“自首”，同时鼓励社区成员积极举报其他涉嫌“女巫”的行为。
此消息一经发布，立即在行业内引起广泛关注与热议。
自2020年起，诸如Uniswap等DeFi项目推出空投计划，吸引用户参与并建立社区，但此举也引发了一系列不当行为。
最初的空投标准相对宽松，例如Uniswap仅要求用户在平台进行一次交易即可获得代币奖励。
然而，这些代币一经上线，便遭到炒作，导致加密社区出现了以“薅羊毛”、“撸空投”为代表的行为。
一时间，各路羊毛党蜂拥而至，部分团队更因此一夜暴富。
然而，这些参与交易的批量账户并非项目的真正用户，却成为了空投的主要受益者，与项目初衷背道而驰。
为此，各项目方开始积极采取措施甄别真实用户和虚假用户。
这些被认定为“虚假”的用户被戏称为“女巫”，类似于中本聪白皮书中的“女巫攻击”，他们的行为并非出于对系统发展的真正贡献，而是出于私利。
从最初的链上交互到与数据分析团队合作，再到如今Layerzero的检举揭发，项目方对“女巫”的甄别日益严格。
这种趋势从项目方和用户双方来看，都是可以预见的。
随着启动成本的增加，项目方对空投的谨慎程度必然提高，而用户从“薅羊毛”中获取的利润也将逐渐减少。
空投一夜暴富的时代已成为历史，项目方对“女巫”的抓捕是必要的，但过度依赖检举揭发并不可取。
这种行为不仅放大了人性的弱点，还制造了不信任的氛围，不利于行业的健康发展。
Layerzero此举引发广泛关注，但也暴露了加密项目在思维方式上的问题。
对于此类项目，笔者未曾深入研究，但对跨区块链项目持谨慎态度，因此未将过多时间精力投入其中。
据悉，未来，即便在进行跨链操作时，笔者大概率不会选择参与这样的项目。
——来自可靠消息源的报道
Call for encryption, ecological elimination of witch behaviors, advocate proper participation in well-known cross-chain projects recently, issue important statements urging users who claim to be witches to voluntarily surrender, and encourage community members to actively report other suspected witch behaviors. Once this news was released, it immediately aroused widespread concern and heated discussion in the industry. Since, projects such as launched airdrop plans to attract users to participate and build communities, but this also triggered a series of misconduct. The initial airdrop standards were relatively loose, for example, only users were required to conduct one on the platform. You can get a token reward for the next transaction. However, once these tokens were launched, they were hyped, which led to the behavior represented by bonus hunter Airdrop. For a time, wool parties from all walks of life flocked to some teams, and some of them became rich overnight. However, these batch accounts involved in the transaction were not the real users of the project, but they became the main beneficiaries of the airdrop, which ran counter to the original intention of the project. Therefore, various project parties began to actively take measures to identify real users and false users, who were identified as false users. Witches, dubbed as witches, are similar to the witches in Satoshi Nakamoto's white paper. Their behavior of attacking them is not out of real contribution to the development of the system, but out of self-interest. From the initial interaction in the chain to the cooperation with the data analysis team, the project side is increasingly strict in screening witches. This trend is predictable from both the project side and the users. With the increase of start-up cost, the project side's caution about airdrops will inevitably increase, and the profits that users get from bonus hunter will gradually decrease. The era of getting rich overnight has become a historical event. It is necessary for the project party to arrest witches, but it is not advisable to rely too much on exposing them. This behavior not only magnifies the weakness of human nature, but also creates an atmosphere of distrust, which is not conducive to the healthy development of the industry. This has aroused widespread concern, but also exposed the thinking problems of encryption projects. I have not studied this kind of projects in depth, but I am cautious about cross-regional block chain projects, so I have not devoted too much time and energy to them. Of course, the following is a press release. It is reported that in the future, even if the cross-chain operation is carried out, the author will not choose to participate in such projects, and such changes are more in line with the tone of news reports and are more acceptable to readers. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台
注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群
打开微信扫一扫
添加客服
进入交流群
1.本站遵循行业规范，任何转载的稿件都会明确标注作者和来源；2.本站的原创文章，请转载时务必注明文章作者和来源，不尊重原创的行为我们将追究责任；3.作者投稿可能会经我们编辑修改或补充。
