Layer2生态困境：blast是否能打破行业僵局？

The original Twitter, the author's encrypted observer source, will rise to more than 100 million dollars in two days, which makes the whole market in a downturn for several months tremble, like the arrival of vampires, and the influx of tasks, airdrops, decoys and involution will spread the cards completely. I think the surprise attack may not be its success, but it is the great fortune of the industry. Why do you say this? We can reflect on the current situation of the industry from a macro level, so that we can better understand the statistics based on it. A number of various projects have emerged, involving many categories. However, most of these projects are still in the stage of technical architecture and narrative construction, and the arguments around harmony continue to win in technology. Subsequently, many unique solutions have emerged, which have taken the lead in realizing the open source and decentralization of components. Their limits have exceeded 10,000, and they have been praised for their more equivalent favor and hidden account abstract experience. Recently, they may once again trigger new narratives, and so on. The fans and Maoists who are in the limelight are busy presenting in the mobile market. Unprecedented technical narrative prosperity, however, is this the end of expansion? Aside from technical factors, the ecological sum has already taken the lead by virtue of the crushing ecological advantage, and it is considered as the final development. The development of more than half a year is only one million dollars, not to mention the fact that there is no obvious data growth season after spontaneity, and it is trying to create brilliance again. The whole ecology of Ethereum has been deadlocked at a high core. Because few people have discussed it in depth, I think this is because they have not found a native application that can strongly stimulate pure financial applications. These troika cannot promote the growth of ecology, and should attract long-tailed users who are sensitive to fees and the threshold of user experience. If they just try to move financial giants such as miners, farmers and scientists, which are already stable on the main network, then I am sorry that they care more about safety than performance improvement, and the centralized security problem that has been criticized has been quietly rationalized. Highly respected by technology, the development threshold has been increased on the circuit, and there have not been some indispensable killer applications. This ecological foundation and the stimulation of a large amount of capital inflow outside the bull market are bound to fall into the embarrassing situation that the technical narrative is grand, the ecological reality is poor, and the market is full of strength, waiting for the arrival of Cancun's upgrade, expecting a significant breakthrough after Cancun. However, it is a pity that Cancun only made some optimization treatments on the cost and could not directly promote the ecological transition. Let's take a look at the four major projects and be proud of it. From the perspective of long-term narrative construction, the strategy of modularization of core components and multi-chain based on these shared components seems good, but there is always a feeling of being too eager for quick success. For example, although its own ecological development is slow, it will suddenly become a part of ecological applications. This wise move throws everything to the developer community. The potential moral is that as long as it develops fast enough, it will be good as a model chain. After all, there are a group of loyal payment users who are omitted here. After all, it's really reasonable to share it with a solid reason for building centralization, and to use the governance mode of the committee to make up for the lack of decentralization. Therefore, the strategy is actually a grab-and-grab strategy, avoiding many shortcomings of current technology and ecology and abstracting an advanced strategy. Now it seems that all kinds of strategies can't see the benefits in the short term except adding some more grand narratives and integrating the scarce developer resources in the industry. I don't think it's too much to go back to the theme. In the short term, it will take away other scarce liquidity that has been regarded as treasures. In the long run, it is completely against the original intention of expanding the ecology to respect a flat and inaction way. Seeing that the ecology is now dead, trying to stimulate it with a dose of fierce medicine is wrong from the perspective of construction, no matter how high the number of users is, it is just a stock market. The success of internal friction individuals is not of great significance, but from the perspective of industry showstopper, we must applaud it. The foreseeable spoiler may bring two direct impacts. If most of the liquidity in the market is taken away, other relatively unpopular players have no choice but to stimulate and drain. Even if they are not in a hurry, they will try their best to promote shuffling. Now it is time to shuffle the cards, and the survival of the fittest, especially some quick or patched ones, will be put back to their original shape. In short, it may not bring a brand-new situation to the market, but at least it will accelerate the industry trend. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=63012