铭文市场火热 BTC L2会像以太坊 L2一样辉煌吗？

After the inscription of the author's encrypted observer source is on fire, many people expect that the layer will be as brilliant as Ethereum. However, the fact is that the success of Bitcoin ecology may be stagnant in the narrative stage of asset issuance for a long time. It may not be feasible to reproduce the ecological diversity of Ethereum. Next, sharing several technical logics and Ethereum belong to two alien chains. The former is a stateless chain, and the latter is based on smart contracts to achieve complex composable financial business logic. The key to moving various financial games from the Ethereum to the bitcoin chain is to build a programmable state calculation verification ability state for bitcoin. At present, the bitcoin collection can only calculate the real-time balance history, and the basic state of these contracts cannot be calculated at all. The unlocking conditions in the bitcoin script can be regarded as its core computing ability, but this computing ability is very limited, and it is difficult to express complex business logic verification. All nodes in the bitcoin network can verify the balance and script sign. Name and other information are limited to these basic verifications, but the Bitcoin network can't even verify the specific implementation effect of these logics. In short, in order to realize complex financial applications on Bitcoin, it is necessary to extend and build a programmable framework with state calculation verification based on the limited capabilities of Bitcoin. Looking back, the expansion routes of Ethereum have gone through many routes and finally chose the mainstream, and the earliest block size adjustment and isolation witness of Bitcoin expansion has long since fallen behind. At present, the curtain is mainly in the orthodox dispute over the authentication of the status channel of the side chain client, because the side chain can't support the smart contract and is too independent to inherit the security route of the main network. It is precisely because it can not only continue the security of Ethereum but also be flexible enough to improve the upper limit. The key is that the users of the main network contract can be verified by the main network and the rights and interests of initiating challenges to withdraw funds. Although some links are not satisfactory in the actual practice process, in theory, the scheme has gained the mainstream. Under the reference of market consensus, the verification of bitcoin side chain client verification status channel is developing in different schools. The side chain supports a wide range of smart contracts, but it is difficult to reach an independent consensus outside Bitcoin. The public unanimously agrees that client verification follows the main network model. Under the chain, the client can handle more complex transactions, but it has no two-way checksum constraint ability with the bitcoin main network, and the development momentum is not yet climate status channel. Because it is close to the core developers, it is regarded as a relatively orthodox expansion at this stage. However, the development of lightning network is too slow on the track. Recently, there is a new result that only the assets running on the main network really land on the lightning network. It is hard to say that if we compare the model of Ethereum with a mature model that is at least protected by the main network and has obvious expansion effect, the most important thing is to be able to run smart contracts with multiple scenarios as the standard. The side chain client verifies the status channel, and it seems that all the channels are not up to the standard. The lightning network client verifies the expansion effect of the side chain, and the side chain client verifies the lightning network combination. Contractual characteristics: the Protestant purpose of the client side chain to verify the expansion route of lightning network is very clear. If safety is the standard, it must wait for the lightning network to develop into a scale. If it only pursues expansion, don't try to rectify Bitcoin. A suitable side chain can solve all problems. If you want to take care of all three at the same time, client verification is the optimal solution. The question is, which route is worthy of the vision of entrusting Bitcoin? Although the side chain can do it, it is an independent consensus chain and Ethereum. What two logical paradoxes have emerged? We already have a super-intelligent contract verification network like Ethereum. Why should we build a brand-new bitcoin side chain? Let Bitcoin keep its position as a value storage chain. Other similar chains in Ethereum can expand and develop the imagination space. Isn't it more perfect to drive backwards? What is the significance of client verification and similar client verification in Ethereum? The comprehensive performance is more suitable for mainstream expansion of bitcoin. This market is still a black box as its name suggests. It is still unknown to what extent, and it is not too early to draw a conclusion. Due to the orthodoxy of lightning network, the state channel was once given high hopes for expanding bitcoin, but then the characteristics of lightning network's partial payment network will eventually lead to a side chain scheme of partial payment network in Ethereum, and it is probably difficult to become the second layer that can undertake a variety of financial games in imagination. In essence, it is too hasty to copy the various financial games in Ethereum to Bitcoin. There may be a lot of room for extension of bitcoin ecology, but it may not be copied. Taifang Imagine that playing innovation in the Ethereum is also influenced by the established fundamentalism behind it, not to mention Bitcoin, whose teachings and teachings will be more stringent. The prosperity of the Ethereum is due to the composability of its smart contracts, which can be combined and stacked indefinitely. The biggest risk in the whole process is actually consensus overload, but the diverse gameplay within the payload is enough to give developers a broad stage, and the bitcoin ecology is too weak because of its own basic functions, and the extensible space is too rich. The security consensus itself is too harsh, and the consensus has also failed. The consensus has built an absolute barrier for Bitcoin, but it is also the root of the limited ecological innovation. Therefore, chaos and contradiction will make most mainstream users of capital institutions feel incomprehensible. Bitcoin ecological outsiders are holding huge sums of money, but they can't get in because they don't know how to say the narrative of Bitcoin in order to be logical, while the developers in Bitcoin ecology are vacillating between various routes and lack a unified development direction. Although the households are in love with each other, everyone only cares about the wealth myth that may be created by inscriptions and coins, which nobody cares about. Although the asset issuance route of Taifang Ecology has various forms, it will eventually focus on the hidden line of value capture. Whether it is driven by retail investors or driven by retail investors, it will eventually be valuable to precipitate Bitcoin ecology. In fact, the market can't stay in the prosperous stage of pure asset issuance forever, and there will eventually be technological breakthroughs, and some people will continue to develop projects. This market can't all be. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=62556