铭文是个Bug还是Feature？

The author, the source and the developer want to ban the tweet of the inscription from causing heated discussion. His main reason is that this is a dispute that will affect the security of the network or has far-reaching influence. If it is a repair, the version that fixes it is a continuation of the orthodox version of the current version. However, if it is a repair, it is to delete this, and the repair version is a bifurcated version, so it is worthy of in-depth discussion. But there is no objective standard for whether a thing is or not. The key is whether it is harmful or beneficial to the software system. How to measure the security of blockchain network has always been a controversial topic. The dimension of measurement that is often used by people is the number of blocks, or the system is not dominant at this point. Remember the article that the nodes used at the beginning were not enough to decentralize and were not safe enough? A measurement method that developers often use. It is the number of all nodes. In order to allow individuals to run all nodes, we should strictly limit the block size and set to reduce the cost of all nodes, but how many all nodes are enough? On the contrary, from the current statistical chart, we can see that many people need to interact and increase the number of all nodes because of the popularity of inscriptions. From the perspective of all nodes, we can't say that inscriptions affect the security of the network. Is it really all the nodes that are safe? Why should users run a full node without incentives? If I spend money to run tens of thousands of nodes alone, can I make the network safer? In fact, what we need is not all the nodes, but the people and organizations represented behind the whole nodes. The blockchain is an open account book. The more people care about whether the account book is correct, the safer the account book is. Why do users care about this account book? Because it records things related to his interests, no matter it. Whether it is good or something else, as long as he thinks it is valuable, he will care about the ledger, and the way for users to care about the ledger is not only to run the whole node by themselves, but also to have this effect as long as users directly connect with the network. For example, the security guarantee brought by users installing wallets on the chain is higher than that brought by users hosting them in exchanges or managed wallets, and what we can see is that this wave of inscription fever has obviously brought more direct connections between users and the network. Browser wallet has brought the embryonic form of application ecology. There are more users who care about what is recorded in this ledger through online transactions. Blockchain browsers have emerged and visited. Therefore, even from the perspective of security, inscriptions and their derivative agreements have improved the security of the network. At first glance, inscriptions do not have much technical content, but they simply and rudely write data on the network and rely on a centralization, but we can understand it as a kind of trust. The data availability layer is only written directly by the client in this mode, which can be called the mode and equivalent to the execution layer in the modular blockchain, so it can also be considered that it is actually the disadvantage of this mode. Obviously, there is no sorter to package transactions in batches, and the user experience is very poor, and the transaction fee is also very expensive. If a technical team designs such a scheme, no investors are willing to invest, but the charm of the market lies in the fact that users have played it out some time ago. However, the advantage of this model is that it is a protocol, and an open protocol and data format chain are designed first, and only the data necessary for the protocol is saved under the chain, while any team can realize an access to the implementation layer network. The whole data is shared, and in the scheme, each is equivalent to circling a piece of land on the network to seize space data separately. For example, if it is equivalent to an old king, it is equivalent to the princes of the old king. Kings, you grab space on my site and grab users. Whoever grabs it and who gets the proceeds. The king's site is my users, and my transaction fee is also mine, but the data is shared. See who can open up new sites and let users play in your new sites. This will completely present a different competitive situation, because any space is always limited. If you fail to open up new space for users to trust, then In fact, the expansion has not been realized, so the inscription shows a new way of construction, which is of great significance to the ecology. It is an impossible solution. Of course, the problem of set expansion that developers are worried about also exists, but it is not unsolvable because the inscription agreement is an offline consensus agreement. As long as we reach a consensus with the community, there can be many solutions. I am here to slap my head and write a few words to replace the inscription. It contains various media files and so on, but in fact, as long as the layer is mature, it can be completely written to the original content and stored in the user's wallet. A set of protocols is designed to support the transfer of inscriptions between the chain and the chain. When the inscriptions are transferred to the chain, they are equivalent to being destroyed, and if they want to return to the chain again, the user needs to provide the transferred signature aggregation, so that they can be verified. Another way is to use a sparse Merkel tree verification method like that. The migration from chain to chain, I originally designed a new migration scheme, but unfortunately, it is difficult to give full play to this advantage through the definition of data object mode, and this mode of inscription is very suitable for interested friends. You can also read this link and stop writing more schemes. What I want to say is that technology is an ecosystem, and it needs to grow with the use and feedback of users. Many innovations are not planned and designed by developers in front of computers, but are randomly tried and then with users. Quotes emerging from feedback collision: I said in my speech that language is a decentralized system. If you accept that a system is decentralized, you have to accept that it will evolve something you don't like, and you have to accept all kinds of failed attempts in its evolution. Interest-related statements: I personally don't own any assets of emerging agreements in the world except what I experienced in January. I just look at its potential and ecological impact from a technical point of view. This article is not an investment suggestion. If it is a long-term person, it doesn't need to be because it has just started. Now most of the assets issued by these agreements belong to currency. Can currency be used for a limited 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=62555