铭文“战争”是旧故事的翻版：教条主义与新嬉皮的搏斗

The author Mi Cai was undoubtedly annoyed. When I saw that a large number of friends went to Twitter to greet his family, I felt a little too much. Let me talk about some of my views. This is a long article, which may take you minutes. I will try my best to use my shallow knowledge and unpretentious words to show you the real bitcoin and help you judge what is the bitcoin core. Does the bitcoin developer have the final say? Is it a complete center bitcoin core development? There are some ambiguities about the word zhe in Chinese. It is not the developer of bitcoin core, but the developer of bitcoin core. You can simply understand that they are not the author of Yijinjing, but the author of Yijinjing. What is the bitcoin core that is maintained by sweeping dust and removing dust? It is a software client. Generally speaking, the bitcoin network is connected by many computer nodes, and many big brothers are often self-deprecating. I am not a big brother. I am just a node. Every computer node should install one. The most used client software is called bitcoin core, just like you drink water every day. Water doesn't belong to anyone, but there just happens to be a mineral water brand called water core. Without this mineral water, you can drink water for another brand or dig a well to collect dew yourself. Can the living still suffocate the urine? Isn't it just like surfing the Internet? In fact, you can use multiple bitcoin clients, such as why most people use it? The client of Bitcoin Core is because it was first written by Satoshi Nakamoto, that is to say, the earliest bitcoin core developer in Satoshi Nakamoto has a great influence. Otherwise, it is just an implementation of the protocol. The implementation of a set of protocols is of course not limited to one application, and it is a completely open source software warehouse address. It is obvious at a glance who modified and when which line of code here. We say that Bitcoin is really an open source game with many levels of code. The transparency of the rules is also one of them. Like other open source projects, the Bitcoin core can be protected. At present, who is maintaining the Bitcoin core? Everyone is free to put forward code changes and test, review and comment on the open pull request. Anyone who contributes code review, test, translation or document to the Bitcoin core project is regarded as a contributor. The release notes of each software version contain a thank-you section to commend all the personnel who contributed to the last release cycle. The table can be found on the internet. The development team behind it is a loose organization with constantly changing personnel, which will not be controlled by any individual. Even in the process of bitcoin development, volunteer developers at the core of Bitcoin have left because they think their work is cumbersome and they can't do it because of lack of money. No individual can control the development of Bitcoin. If the project is maliciously manipulated and the development direction deviates, software users and miners can choose to install other software or create a client open source. So I often say who are you, even if Satoshi Nakamoto comes? That fake Twitter in Satoshi Nakamoto has been resurrected this year, and it has also been proved by many parties to be a liar. Let's make a hypothesis that he is himself. Actually, it doesn't matter if the developers of Bitcoin core are rich. It is mentioned above that some people leave them because they have no money. It's a bit like Buddhism in Judaism, where legalism studies teachings, contributes to ecological rigidity and restraint, and it's hateful and pitiful. For many years, the operation of Bitcoin core mainly depends on everyone. Donation here can be translated into bitcoin minimalism or bitcoin extremism. The core point of bitcoin is that there should be only one cryptocurrency in the world, and all other cryptocurrencies are scams. Shit seems to be a very typical dogmatic struggle with new hippies. What do bitcoin minimalists think? In fact, there is no clear statement that can unify all the views of minimalists. This word has been born for a long time, and its real popularity originated from bitcoin minimalists in. Of course, a few months later, the launch of Ethereum is another story. I briefly summarize the minimalist point of view. In fact, the Chinese community is very familiar with the concept of "ten thousand chains returning to the motherland". There are three characteristics: no leadership, fair supply and distribution, ethical protection of personal sovereignty. Are the views within the Bitcoin community consistent? We must admit the elegance of Bitcoin. Personally, I also agree with the views of Bitcoin minimalists. Most cryptocurrencies except Bitcoin are actually from birth. Manipulated sickle scam, but the internal views of Bitcoin are never consistent, so it is difficult for you to judge whether a Bitcoin person's views are logical, emotional, scientific or dogmatic, such as laser eye encryption, currency moralization, bitcoin elite populism, etc. Some Bitcoin users choose to follow the orthodoxy based on white paper, but like any religious organization based on text, it can be explained in many ways that there are obvious defects, such as Islam, Sunnis and Shiites have different views on a Koran, and some Bitcoin people break into other people's lives and punish them from the standpoint of moral superiority, and even threaten each other with death. Some Bitcoin people quit because of boredom and just silently hold or maintain Bitcoin, but the debate within the community has never stopped. It is in this quarrel that the mainstream Bitcoin culture degenerates from ideological expression to the reproduction of old stories, and the old enemies are replaced by new enemies that are more in line with the trend of the times. The attack of simplists Bitcoin people have always maintained the tradition of Bitcoin players fighting against the world, but it has also led many novices to over-defend their beliefs. In fact, most people's heads have been short-circuited, and people have no time to digest narrative new words and numerous encryption protocols and sickle projects under the huge information flow. Today's internal dispute over the number of white skins and token economic models is actually a struggle between dogmatism and new hippies. Of course, this struggle is also an inflection point, but anyway, it is fair Flat bitcoin will be benign in front of it, just like the expansion war many years ago. At least we won't roll back a lot. People don't even know that Ethereum rolled back on that year's problem. Since we all know that ordinal numbers can increase miners' fees and have a siphon effect on other chains, why are bitcoin extremists so fiercely opposed to shallow speculation that they are not in the car? This speculation is likely but not necessarily tenable in the Bitcoin forum in the gathering place. As early as January this year, the debate on ordinal number theory has started, from bitcoin does not need spam to revisiting the white paper on the side chain ten years ago. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=62536