三分钟了解Runes：简洁的比特币资产发行协议

In a recent tweet, he revealed his proposal for the interchangeable token agreement on the bitcoin platform, the symbol ordinal agreement. This proposal has aroused people's broad interest and discussion on the eco-interchangeable token. Although there are disputes in some fields, this type of token has already had a certain position in the blockchain field, and its persistence is undeniable. Its development reflects the wide acceptance of innovation by the bitcoin community. In this article, we will discuss the urgency and necessity of the agreement and its basic principle requirements. Comparison and analysis of previous protocols, etc. In the process of exploring this new protocol, we will reveal its potential challenges under the background of the evolving bitcoin ecosystem. Why do we need new protocols? Redundancy is very common in the evolving blockchain and cryptocurrency fields. It seems that many protocols are emerging every day. People may think, do we really need so many protocols? The answer includes both opportunities and necessity, because there are many potential benefits in building a powerful interchangeable token protocol specifically for Bitcoin. A good protocol design can open an important transaction fee income switch. With the increase of adoption rate, the economic incentives of miners and the whole network will also increase the interest of developers. By providing a simplified and efficient system, such a protocol can attract the attention of developers and expand the user base. The new protocol can attract a wider user base, which is not just about quantity but diversity. Different users bring different use cases, expand the diversity and resilience of the ecosystem and solve the current defects. Although the existing protocol is groundbreaking, it shows all kinds of inefficiencies and limitations. A new protocol can learn from past experience and pursue more optimized design. Stagnation in the technical field is equivalent to retrogression. It is also valuable to re-conceive and re-invent on the existing basis, especially when the goal is to solve the existing defects and have untapped potential. Compared with the current protocol, the interchangeable token protocol for Bitcoin is not new. There have been several proposals and implemented protocols with their own characteristics. There are unique advantages and disadvantages. Let's analyze some famous protocols, which are famous for their association with inscriptions. Their design is more driven by popular technology than efficient engineering. As a result, it is an extremely inefficient protocol. It requires multiple transactions to perform basic operations from issuing tokens to transferring tokens. This protocol is more complicated, and it relies heavily on offline data. Its development has been jumping tickets and its application scope is limited. Although it is innovative, this protocol has introduced some native tokens needed for operations. However, they also bring additional complexity and reduce the scope of application. Although this protocol is advanced, it depends to a great extent on the obstacles that may be encountered in the implementation and user experience of offline data. In this lineup, the latest competitors promise to be simple and efficient, and to be more user-friendly and more in line with the original structure by adopting the system based on and using the tags in the output script. However, like any new proposal, its reality should be tested. In the context of existing protocols, every protocol has a fresh wind. A series of challenges emerged at the historic moment in the complex landscape. The unique concise light was conceived by the innovator behind the protocol to solve many previous protocols, especially the inefficient problems. It all originated from the concept outlined in a rough blog post, which was launched within seven hours after it was put forward. It also proved that the simplicity of the core of the flexible mechanism of the encryption community is different from the multi-level nature of some protocols, and the design is elegant and simple. By using it in transactions, tokens are allocated to specific ones with output indexes. The number of tokens and the simplified mechanism of tokens are not only easy to understand, but also efficient to issue and circulate in operation. The protocol clearly defines the flow and distribution of tokens, and reserves a special message for the initial issuance of tokens, which ensures the clarity and transparency of token operation. The core desire of the rune is to fix the defects, although it is widely used, but it is greatly affected by the inefficiency caused by its dependence on inscriptions, which leads to a lengthy multi-step transaction phase when performing basic operations. In contrast, it tries to simplify this process, simplify token operation and improve chain efficiency, and participate cautiously. However, although it looks promising, it also emphasizes a recurring theme in the field of encryption. The rapid adoption of ideas without thorough review or long-term design considerations echoes the same fanaticism that once surrounded it, leading to the challenges it is facing at present. It stands out in the grand picture of encryption innovation with its concise and efficient commitment, but it is as broad as all new entrants. The process of adoption will be the real touchstone to test its essence. At first glance, it may seem to be a promising supplement to the bitcoin ecosystem. However, after careful examination, it reveals a complex and often inefficient mechanism for interchangeable tokens. The main challenge stems from its internal connection with the inscription. This combination is not from an engineering point of view, but from a trend-driven mentality. Although the inscription is a hot new thing, it is not the best choice for the token agreement. A major defect of the low-rate protocol is the multi-step nature of its operation, which requires multiple transactions whether issuing or transferring tokens. This is directly the result of encoding token data into the chain with inscriptions. This requires a phased transaction efficiency comparison before the actual inscription data is recorded, and it is compared with the newly proposed protocols such as runes. All these protocols can issue and transfer tokens in a single transaction, but they need two transactions later. This inefficiency is not only Technical negligence is a sign that it is more driven by hype than by sound design. The bigger picture is not only an isolated technical failure, but also a sign that the adoption of deeper problems in protocol design and adoption and its popularity are due to its fair start-up method, early adopters' enthusiasm for spending money and promoting it on social media. This organic growth and community-driven support have pushed it to its current position. The power of grass-roots movement in the secret field is summarized. The journey from the complexity to the bright future provides valuable proof for the continuous evolution of blockchain and bitcoin. Every turning point, every challenge and solution depicts an ecosystem that thrives in innovation but struggles in its fast pace. With the agreement, it has entered the spotlight, bearing the lessons of the past and the hope of simplifying the future. Its commitment to simplicity and efficiency is fascinating, but the responsibility in the community needs to be embraced with enthusiasm and caution. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=62452