智能铭文设想

币圈资讯 阅读:33 2024-04-22 11:37:47 评论:0
美化布局示例

欧易(OKX)最新版本

【遇到注册下载问题请加文章最下面的客服微信】永久享受返佣20%手续费!

APP下载   全球官网 大陆官网

币安(Binance)最新版本

币安交易所app【遇到注册下载问题请加文章最下面的客服微信】永久享受返佣20%手续费!

APP下载   官网地址

火币HTX最新版本

火币老牌交易所【遇到注册下载问题请加文章最下面的客服微信】永久享受返佣20%手续费!

APP下载   官网地址

原文作者:jackygu,mirror

(接《说说铭文》) 上文书的结论是:铭文实际上是一场反对智能合约的运动。

那么,我们真的要放弃智能合约吗?真的要摒弃过去六七年来围绕着智能合约建立的庞大的DeFi、NFT和应用生态吗?

我认为没有必要。

最近我在几个不同的链上打了铭文,打完后要进行交易、转让等操作时其实很繁琐。每个链都有自己的挂单系统,之后每条链还可能需要开发Swap,质押等服务。然而,在以太坊、BSC、Polygon和众多的二层EVM链的生态系统中,这些问题早已得到了很好的解决。我们为什么不利用这些成熟的生态系统呢?

基于此,我认为将铭文的公平理念与智能合约的庞大生态结合是重要机会。我不知道有没有人做铭文和EVM链资产的跨链,但从技术上看,我认为如果要做一个完全去中心化的跨链,目前还有一定难度,而如果做一个资产托管型的跨链服务,所面临的法律风险是任何人都无法承受的。

此外,当我们回看铭文的创始人Casey去年写的博文时,会发现他最初提出Oridinals协议是为了在比特币链上发行NFT(非同质化代币),而不是FT(同质化代币,典型的是ERC20代币)。然而,今年3月8日基于Oridinals协议的BRC-20标准发布后,让很多人发现Oridinals协议也可以用于发行FT,这引发了一轮类似于6年前基于ERC20发行资产的热潮。Casey曾多次对BRC-20持非正面评价,认为Oridinals协议被滥用了,相关观点也在比特币核心社区(比特币论坛)成为主流。因此,两个月前,Casey专门为FT资产提出了一个更好的协议:Runes(符文)。

由此我们看到,铭文同时具备NFT和FT的特点,NFT是铭文的商品属性,FT是铭文的资产属性,两者相辅相成。所以,铭文是过去几年未曾见到过的一种资产形式。

基于以上认知,我构想了一个名为"智能铭文"(Smart Inscription)的东西,它可能会具备以下几个特点:

  • 基于智能合约,完全在链上记账。

  • 基于公平发射和免费铸造理念,回归Ferc1.0版的初心和防女巫策略。

  • 参与成本极低,可能会部署在Base/optimism链上,预计铸造费用低于0.15U,部署费用低于0.3U,该费用远低于Ferc3.0版上600多美元的部署费用和20多美元的铸造费用。

  • 基于社区,可以在推特、Discord、微博、微信等社交App中直接登录钱包操作,无需下载新的App(技术上基于Wallet As A Service服务,类似服务已被friend.teth等社交应用广泛采用,安全性和便利性已被证实)。

  • 新协议在ERC721基础上扩展,实现铭文NFT。与pfp NFT不同的是,铭文NFT是一种类似于Loot的动态文本NFT(Dynamic Text NFT)(见下图)。它的优点是基于链上数据可以动态改变呈现方式,比如,当铭文NFT转成ERC20 FT后,在OpenSea等NFT交易所中会直观的呈现出不同的状态。

  • 铭文NFT可随时与ERC20互换,以在更庞大且成熟的DeFi生态系统中使用。

  • 协议极简,无主合约,数据完全存储在链上,没有任何人能够篡改。

  • 无服务器架构,全链操作,无需运营,免维护,永不宕机。

智能合约

前些天,我以书面形式向FercDAO治理委员会提交了上述设想,这两天开始敲代码。如果一切顺利,预计本周将推出核心功能。

有些朋友可能会说,在以太坊上的铭文(eths)价格已经突破1万元,而ferc却没有什么进展,你的设想大概率没有用。我承认,作为一名开发者,在半年前Ferc1.0版上线后,犯了很多错误,包括:

  • 过于涉足非技术事务;

  • Ferc20平台从1.0版的公平铸造理念发展成了3.0版的融资平台,背离了公平发射和免费铸造的初衷。

这些错误都是致命的,让很多朋友感到失望。现在是纠正的时候了。

还有人说,Ferc20起步很早,但进展却很慢,错过了这次铭文机会。我认为这没关系,毕竟铭文的发展至今只有半年多,还没有出现实质性的创新,也尚未充分接触到区块链圈最庞大的群体:以太坊用户。所以,何不让我们试一试,看看"智能铭文"能否来个铭文的范式创新,撬动经过近十年沉淀,对区块链和智能合约有信仰的庞大用户群呢?


The author of the original text goes on to say that the conclusion of the document on the inscription is that the inscription is actually a movement against the smart contract. So do we really have to abandon the smart contract? Do we really have to abandon the huge and applied ecology built around the smart contract in the past six or seven years? I don't think it's necessary. Recently, I typed inscriptions on several different chains, and it's actually very complicated to transfer transactions after the completion. After each chain has its own pending order system, each chain may need to develop services such as pledge. These problems have been well solved in Taifang and many second-tier chain ecosystems. Why don't we make use of these mature ecosystems? Based on this, I think it is an important opportunity to combine the fair concept of inscriptions with the huge ecology of smart contracts. I don't know if anyone has done cross-chain of inscriptions and chain assets, but technically, I think it is still difficult to do a completely decentralized cross-chain, and the legal wind faced by doing an asset custody cross-chain service. In addition, when we look back at the blog post written by the founder of the inscription last year, we will find that he originally proposed an agreement to issue non-homogeneous tokens instead of homogeneous tokens on the bitcoin chain, which is typically tokens. However, after the release of the standard based on the agreement on April this year, many people found that the agreement can also be used for issuance, which triggered a wave of enthusiasm similar to that based on issuing assets years ago. There were many negative comments that the agreement was abused, and the relevant views were also in the bitcoin core. The bitcoin forum of the Heart Community has become the mainstream, so two months ago, a better agreement symbol was specially put forward for assets. From this, we can see that the inscription has the characteristics of both, that is, the commodity attribute of the inscription is the asset attribute of the inscription, and the two complement each other, so the inscription is an asset form that has never been seen in the past few years. Based on the above cognition, I conceived a thing called smart inscription, which may have the following characteristics: based on smart contracts, it is completely accounted for on the chain, based on fair launch and free casting. The initial intention and anti-witch strategy of the concept regression version have extremely low participation cost and may be deployed on the chain. It is estimated that the casting cost is lower than the deployment cost, which is much lower than the multi-dollar deployment cost and multi-dollar casting cost of the version. Based on the community, you can log in to the wallet directly in social activities such as Twitter, Weibo and WeChat without downloading new technology. Similar services based on services have been widely adopted by social applications such as security and convenience. The new protocol has been expanded to realize the inscription on the basis. The difference is the inscription. It is a kind of similar dynamic text, as shown in the figure below. Its advantage is that the presentation mode can be dynamically changed based on the data in the chain. For example, when the inscription is converted, it will intuitively present different States in the exchange, and the inscription can be exchanged at any time to use the protocol in a larger and mature ecosystem. The contract data is minimalist and completely stored in the chain. No one can tamper with the server-free architecture. The whole chain operation needs no operation, no maintenance and no downtime. The other day, I submitted a smart contract to the governance Committee in writing. After submitting the above ideas, I will start to knock on the code in the next two days. If all goes well, it is expected that the core functions will be launched this week. Some friends may say that the price of the inscription on the Ethereum has exceeded 10,000 yuan, but there is no progress. Your idea is highly useless. I admit that as a developer, I made many mistakes after the version went online six months ago, including getting too involved in non-technical affairs platforms, from the fair casting concept of version to the financing platform of version, which deviated from the original intention of fair launch and free casting. It's fatal to disappoint many friends. Now it's time to correct it. Some people say that they started early but made slow progress and missed this opportunity for inscription. I think it doesn't matter. After all, the development of inscriptions has only been more than half a year, and there has not been any substantial innovation or full contact with the largest group of users in the blockchain circle. So why not let us try to see if the paradigm innovation of intelligent inscriptions can incite a huge user group who has faith in blockchain and smart contracts after nearly ten years of precipitation? 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

文字格式和图片示例

注册有任何问题请添加 微信:MVIP619 拉你进入群

弹窗与图片大小一致 文章转载注明 网址:https://netpsp.com/?id=62292

美化布局示例

欧易(OKX)最新版本

【遇到注册下载问题请加文章最下面的客服微信】永久享受返佣20%手续费!

APP下载   全球官网 大陆官网

币安(Binance)最新版本

币安交易所app【遇到注册下载问题请加文章最下面的客服微信】永久享受返佣20%手续费!

APP下载   官网地址

火币HTX最新版本

火币老牌交易所【遇到注册下载问题请加文章最下面的客服微信】永久享受返佣20%手续费!

APP下载   官网地址
可以去百度分享获取分享代码输入这里。
声明

1.本站遵循行业规范,任何转载的稿件都会明确标注作者和来源;2.本站的原创文章,请转载时务必注明文章作者和来源,不尊重原创的行为我们将追究责任;3.作者投稿可能会经我们编辑修改或补充。

发表评论
平台列表
美化布局示例

欧易(OKX)

  全球官网 大陆官网

币安(Binance)

  官网

火币(HTX)

  官网

Gate.io

  官网

Bitget

  官网

deepcoin

  官网
关注我们

若遇到问题,加微信客服---清歌

搜索
排行榜
扫一扫,加我为微信好友加我为微信好友