2024年：监管妥协之年

After the constant conflict between encryption enterprises and other regulatory agencies in, we will see more regulatory dialogue and progress in. With the collapse of many encryption operators, regulators flocked to claim that the industry was full of fraud, fraud, bankruptcy and money laundering. In order to solve these perceived defects, the US Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission jointly launched more than one law enforcement against encryption industry participants during. Action is like an autoimmune reaction that can't distinguish between good and bad. Regulators have prosecuted both those who violated the law and those who tried to abide by the law. What was captured by regulators' law enforcement network included a unique animated cat image publisher, a decentralized autonomous organization and many celebrity influencers, including Kim Kardashian, Paul Pierce and a new chapter from fierce fighting to compromise encryption supervision. The conflict between encryption industry and regulators is escalating in 2008, and it is predicted that the regulatory level will be ushered in. More dialogue and compromise. Regulators enforce the law vigorously, accusing almost all industry participants of violating the old laws and regulations whose applicability is doubtful, and refusing to formulate clearer rules. However, by the end of the year, regulators also suffered setbacks, and they began to tend to reach a settlement with encryption exchanges instead of protracted litigation. As I predicted at the end of last year, 2008 is a year of supervision and decentralization. As an election year, Congress is unlikely to pass comprehensive encryption legislation. However, regulators may adjust the failed regulatory enforcement strategy and turn to cooperate with the industry to establish a temporary regulatory framework by consulting rules and exempting licenses. Participants in the encryption industry and regulators share common interests, and both sides are badly hit by last year's crash and are eager to prevent bad actors from damaging the whole industry again. Although it is unlikely that a legislative solution will be introduced in the short term, the chairman's tough stance on cracking down on widespread non-compliance in the industry may loosen other regulations. Institutions also need to compromise. The legal challenge of rejecting their bitcoin application won the unanimous ruling of three judges of the Washington, D.C., Circuit Court of Appeals. The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit also demanded a response to a petition on the rules of encrypted asset securities. Fighting against regulatory ultra vires is not only a struggle in the encryption industry, but also the fifth in a lawsuit filed by the American Chamber of Commerce against the US Securities and Exchange Commission last month. The Circuit Court of Appeal ruled that it did not fully consider the opinions of the industry and did not conduct a proper cost-benefit analysis, so its behavior in formulating the disclosure rules of stock repurchase was arbitrary and willful. It also faced lawsuits filed by six industry groups accusing the institution of exceeding its legal power in formulating new regulations on the supervision of private equity fund consultants. In addition, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal recently stated that the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission did not provide any supporting reasons for abusing its power when withdrawing the exemption letter from a registered exchange. It is also because the agency arbitrarily rejected its application for listing on the new event contract platform and took it to court. Such legal proceedings that challenge administrative measures may continue to restrict and constrain the actions of the regulatory agency next year. Due to the judgment of the case, it has recently approved the Ethereum based on futures. It is rumored that the agency will approve the turn of spot bitcoin as soon as next month, and the new opportunities in the industry. With the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit asking the US Securities and Exchange Commission to respond to the petition of the industry to formulate rules, it chose to refuse. However, the chairman's public comments this time are quite different from the previous tough stance that only a few encrypted assets are not securities. He said that of course, not all encrypted assets are necessarily provided and sold in the form of securities. I look forward to cooperating with encryption projects and middlemen who want to abide by the law. Although there is no willingness to formulate a comprehensive regulatory framework for the encryption industry, the agency will still introduce some new regulations in the coming year, which will have an impact on industry participants, including redefining the exchange. The trust agreement system and the proposal requiring investment advisers to hand over encrypted assets to qualified custodians are likely to cause similar administrative and legal challenges if these two proposals are adopted in their current forms. Many industry groups and encryption companies complain that it is against the principle of major issues to put forward these regulations without explicit authorization from Congress. Considering that these regulations may be delayed by legal disputes or even abolished after the change of governance in the future, it may prompt major concessions except forced cooperation. Participants in the subpoena encryption industry will also have reason to expand their interaction with the staff of the regulatory agencies next year. With the continuous growth of the demand for encrypted assets by institutions, industry participants will seek to provide a series of products that need to cooperate with the regulatory agencies. For example, many types of real-world assets token products obviously belong to the regulatory scope that requires the approval of the staff. If financial institutions that want to provide encrypted margin transactions and perpetual contracts in the United States need the approval, they will be carefully supervised. After a long year of legal confrontation, we can expect the relationship between the encryption industry and the regulatory authorities to ease slightly, even if only a little, which will bring benefits to both sides. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=62163