2024年Web3创新展望：形势紧迫、条件具备、关键在思路

Author Meng Yan co-founded the source. The current situation is very obvious. If the market will usher in a bull market in the normal development year, capital and market sentiment will drive asset prices to rise sharply. Although there have been three bull markets in the past decade, the external environment is obviously different this time. Simply put, the previous bull markets made money, and other industries also made money. People envy you, but they don't envy you this time. Now the global political and economic situation is gradually becoming complex and tense, and many people are having a hard time against this background. In contrast, if an industry that is generally regarded as speculative gambling is unusually prosperous, it will be particularly dazzling, and there are not many people who are willing to speak for it now. Since the violent collapse of the market in, the curiosity and patience of the outside world for the industry have been basically exhausted. Today, it is difficult for us to find outsiders who have a positive impression without prejudice except the stakeholders within the industry. If there is a bull market, this prejudice and strong negative impression will easily be stimulated. It turns into jealousy and hatred, and then it becomes a fierce intervention or even a blow to the industry. In serious cases, the market may collapse instantly because of external intervention, and some people will also be troubled. People in the troubled industry should be psychologically prepared for this. What should we do? It has become particularly important and urgent to clarify the relationship with. I define it as a transaction aimed at building encrypted digital assets. The technological innovation movement of credible digital economy is ideally interrelated with each other. The real economy is a virtual economy, but the actual situation is that in this combination for many years, speculation and speculation have been repeatedly refurbished and applied for a long time. There are three reasons for this problem. First, many people do not believe in the future. Second, the technical infrastructure needed for success is very weak. Third, the guiding ideology and methodology have not been established to solve these three problems. Will it develop very vigorously, so can these three problems be solved in 2008? I think it is very opportunity to look at the narrative of the first question, that is, whether it is a promising question. It is not difficult to understand that the technical foundation of building an autonomous and credible contract environment in the digital economy is solid and feasible, and the logic is clear and the value is clear. In itself, the future problem should not be a problem, but because of the premature financialization, it is not a problem for the narrative. There has been a lot of interference. In his recent article, he complained about the so-called "speculative trading". It is precisely for this reason that there is a well-known secret in the circle that few people openly point out, that is, a considerable number of the most successful people in this industry simply don't understand or believe that they never believe that blockchain and decentralized technology have any other uses besides speculative trading. Therefore, as successful people in this industry, they often want to show their transparency and frankness. Publicly preaching that blockchain is not applicable to the real economy and mocking castles in the air is impossible. This situation has appeared in Asian circles on a large scale, which has seriously interfered with people's understanding of it. The reason for this absurd situation is that the outside world generally confuses with the industry. In fact, many successful people in the trading market do not know much about technology, especially cryptography, and only trade assets as another speculative target through speculative trading or market manipulation. Even though they have made good profits temporarily in the market, they don't understand, care about or disdain the underlying logic of learning, and they can't see the possible impact of cryptography technology on the real economy and life. If they confuse it with making money simply, they may regard these temporary trading winners as successful people in the industry, thinking that they have high awareness and take their words as truth, but this is a serious misunderstanding because it is not the same thing. A successful trader in the market may be. Speculators may be experts in accurately grasping the rabble's speculative psychology, market manipulators, insider traders, arbitrageurs or just lucky people, but all these may have nothing to do with his cognitive level. A successful person may not even know the basic technical concepts, and may think from the heart that cryptography is a gobbledygook blockchain, which is purely a gimmick. In the real world, if a Wall Street trader gives a big model, Innovation points the way or asserts that there is a structural error in the molecular formula of an anticancer drug. Most people will think that this guy is paranoid. No one will think that he has more say than a professor at Johns Hopkins University because he made money in biomedical stocks. But in the industry, a master trader or, more likely, a master market manipulator or insider trader, commonly known as sickle pair or advanced certification technology, can attract people's applause. The absurdity of the situation should be fully understood, and the right to speak must be returned to those who are really doing innovation. The narrative clearly shows the logic and feasibility of the future, and the question of whether there is a future will be solved. The second question, that is, the problem of weak technical infrastructure, has been a very serious problem in the past decade. In fact, people's expectations for it have run far ahead of the development of infrastructure, so that many application ideas can't be said well but can't be done or The effect is very poor after it is made, which is one of the important reasons why some crooked monks assert that there is no chance, because they can only judge from the superficial phenomenon because they don't know the technology, but the infrastructure has made great progress in the past few years. The infrastructure mentioned here not only refers to the blockchain, but also includes various protocol layers and auxiliary components such as account wallet development tools, developer education, etc. It is particularly important to point out that the stable currency is also an infrastructure and may be one of the core infrastructures. In fact, the development of fixed currency, compliance and stability is an important condition for application innovation today. To what extent has the infrastructure developed now? In short, it has begun to take shape. In terms of performance, it has reached the point where it can make a difference. In terms of cost, it also has the conditions for large-scale promotion. Therefore, both performance and cost are enough to support the basic chain of some large-scale and high-concurrency application scenarios. At present, the main problem is that the fragmentation of sects has begun to appear, and each has its own advantages and slots have not yet appeared. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=61937