Luke 限制铭文的「阴谋」落空？市场在呼唤比特币 L2 的新解

Since last month, core developers have frequently made fierce attacks on the inscription track represented by it, and even once put forward a community proposal to restrict the inscription on the bitcoin chain. However, the latest news that the proposal to restrict the inscription has not been passed and has been closed, although most developers still express their dislike for the inscription community as a whole, other developers do not agree with the extreme proposal that the market will find ways to digest itself by itself without intervention, which also means a heated debate. The Chinese community gradually realized the importance of the solution in shaping the future of Bitcoin, and the inscription exposed the defects of Bitcoin. Since the emergence of the Ethereum and the public chain ecology, almost every carnival in the industry over the years was no longer dominated by Bitcoin, and even gradually there was a trend of dancing alone without Bitcoin. It was not until this upsurge that it was finally no longer absent, accompanied by the blowout development of Bitcoin ecology, as the best asset in the circle was cited by the inscription. The new asset form born of the stream is also bound to generate new demand, but the fire of inscriptions also exposes the defects at the bottom of Bitcoin to some extent. First of all, most of the tens of millions of inscription transactions are small transactions to be processed, which is actually equivalent to the attacked junk transactions. It may not be packaged and broadcast on the chain for a lifetime, because the inscription is similar to allowing users to record all kinds of data on the blockchain, but as a whole, because the transaction costs of Bitcoin are paid according to the data scale, inscription users often. They tend to set a relatively low transaction fee, which means that they are willing to wait for a longer time to confirm, and this will easily lead to the replacement of inscription transactions by more urgent bitcoin transfers. In this context, these massive inscription transactions that are willing to queue up have all burst into the bitcoin memory pool to store all the effective transactions that have not been formally added to the network. Secondly, there are still underlying defects in the intelligent contract scenarios such as direct realization on the bitcoin main chain, which makes our hands full. There are still many attempts to release the liquidity of bitcoin assets, such as non-interest-bearing assets, which can not be used in various wider use scenarios. The most important one is that the liquidity pledge in the form of encapsulation is equivalent to the liquidity pledge of bitcoin version. For example, users in the wave of the year can pledge to obtain the corresponding packaged tokens, so as to bridge the liquidity to Ethereum Ecology and gain benefits through coupling with Ethereum Ecology. From this point of view, if we can compare The introduction of special currency into a wider range of application scenarios is equivalent to revitalizing Bitcoin, a high-quality encrypted native asset, and bringing diversified income sources to Bitcoin holders. It can be said that the balance of Bitcoin is killing two birds with one stone. The competition in the field of Bitcoin was fierce long before the wave. The following is the specific balance network involved in different types that may be built on Bitcoin, such as lightning network and these solutions are not blockchains, but networks that store data under the chain and are stored by users. The accessibility and interactivity of smart contracts are greatly reduced, so users can't experience the comprehensive functions provided by smart contract blockchains such as Ethereum or others. They also require users to run their own nodes or infrastructure in order to completely decentralize, which leads to significant user experience obstacles in adoption. However, the scalability and privacy advantages provided by this method far exceed the scope provided by blockchain technology, making it a specific application use case, especially a large-scale branch. The best choice to pay is to decentralize the side chain, such as solutions. Decentralizing the side chain enables anyone to participate in the consensus, that is, mining, because they supplement their safety budget through new tokens issued by the agreement, which has spawned a fierce competition in the miners' market. Miners spend resources competing for the original tokens of the blockchain network, which are then used by users to pay for the implementation of smart contracts. In this case, if there is no token, the only income of miners can only be opened. The company behind the work pays or is based on the user fees generated by the blockchain network, but these fees are usually insignificant in the first few years until the network is used on a large scale. This kind of compensation for miners is necessary because mining in the workload-proof consensus model costs money, and there is also the risk that funds will be cut in the equity certificate. Even Bitcoin and Ethereum each have more than 100 million users, and they mainly subsidize their network security through tokens. To solve this problem, the joint side chain is not open to everyone for mining. For example, it has set up a group composed of two encryption service providers, including exchange dealers and infrastructure providers. Although this method can work well, it needs to trust the selected entities. At the same time, in order to become more decentralized over time, there will be an old problem, how to attract a large number of users and generate considerable expenses while the trusted groups are running. In order to realize the automation and democratization of membership, trust is transferred to the hardware used, and new solutions are urgently needed. Since last year, with the agreement of peace and other agreements attracting more developers to build and apply new options on Bitcoin, compatible solutions have begun to appear, and many new solutions have adopted this method. This decision will undoubtedly help accelerate market expansion and ensure compatibility with exchanges and blockchain infrastructure, taking it as a core goal of compatibility. It is to expand the smart contract scene of Bitcoin, help break through the constraint that the bitcoin blockchain is not Turing complete and does not support smart contracts, so that it can be built as a native decentralized application, in which when a user crosses the bitcoin main network, the user's will enter the contract address hosted by a node, and then at the same time, the network will generate a new one according to the proportion. When the user sends an instruction to cross the bitcoin back to the main network, the network node will trigger the contract, and the nodes hosting assets will automatically sign according to the established rules. The whole process of returning to the user's address is completely decentralized and without trust, which means that all transactions are transferred from the bitcoin main chain to the network operation. At the same time, due to full compatibility, it is easy to enable all kinds of decentralized applications to empower bitcoin ecological sub-projects. The developers of Ethereum can directly and seamlessly migrate to and quickly build and even borrow liquidity pledges, which brings more possibilities to the bitcoin ecology. Compared with the first two, it is also the most decentralized and convenient summary. Generally speaking, most bitcoin projects actually have huge risks or even half of them. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=61721