法官考虑驳回SEC监管 花旗继续上调Coinbase目标价

Whether cryptocurrency is a securities product or not, the protracted legal battle on the supervision of cryptocurrency in the United States is still going on, but from the latest situation, the balance of victory seems to be leaning towards the exchange. A federal judge expressed doubts about the proposition of the US Securities and Exchange Commission on Wednesday, pointing out that if the proposition is supported, the definition of securities may be inadvertently extended to areas such as collectibles, which are not within the scope of supervision. The judge questioned that the definition of securities is too broad. The district judge presided over the hearing of the request to dismiss the civil lawsuit, and sued it as an unregistered securities broker last month. In June, he filed a motion to dismiss the case, arguing that there was no legal right to supervise cryptocurrency exchanges. During the five-hour hearing, she seemed to disagree with her opinion. She said to her lawyer in court, I want to know how your standards do not involve the collectible market or commodities. I am worried that your arguments are too broad. At the end of the hearing on Wednesday, no ruling was made, but it was pre-announced. A decision will be made in the next few months. If she allows all or part of the case to continue, the lawsuit may be held next year. Speculating money is like buying a baseball card or a beanie doll and securities. This case has a considerable impact, and the legal confrontation between them is a critical moment in the supervision and compliance of cryptocurrency. The result of this case may set a precedent and affect the supervision of digital assets in the United States and even the world, and the ruling result of the case will also greatly affect the company's business observers. It is believed that if a securities broker is recognized, it will be forced to reorganize a number of services, such as trading marking and custody, and the company may face major operational and financial challenges. The highest loss of income is cited in the case of suing large cryptocurrency exchanges such as Bi 'an, which provides a definition for investment contracts. Investment contracts are a kind of securities products that are different from stocks and bonds. It is believed that most cryptocurrencies meet the definition of investment contracts, which means that if they do not comply with the new york Stock Exchange. One of the defense reasons for the accusation that cryptocurrencies cannot be traded under the same rules as Wall Street brokers is the so-called principle of major issues, which requires that federal agencies in the United States be restricted from issuing laws and regulations of great economic and political significance without clear instructions from Congress. At the hearing on Wednesday, a lawyer said that Congress did not grant the power to supervise cryptocurrencies, but it acted on its own. If the court accepts the claims in the case, it will have legislative impact and affect the whole industry. Regarding the argument that cryptocurrency is an investment contract, it is argued that cryptoassets do not carry dividends and other contractual commitments, so the transactions in the secondary market outside the jurisdiction are only between individuals, and there is no specific investment contract unique to securities. Most cryptocurrencies are commodities rather than securities. Investors may hope that cryptocurrency will appreciate, just like collecting baseball cards or peas, but this is not enough to make it a securities. After the hearing, Citigroup raised its target price from US dollars to US dollars, which rose by about 20% before the press release. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=61411