Coinbase Ventures：2024跨链桥现状

With the continuous growth of the number of asset chains in the encryption ecosystem, the importance of the bridge across the chain has also increased. The main use case of the bridge is still the transfer of assets, the exchange of tokens in one chain with tokens in another chain, and the exchange of tokens in the chain into tokens in the chain to compete in all aspects, such as the distribution of product functions and security profiles. Unforeseen multi-chain distribution technologies such as listing and overlapping with Oracle will be used and popularized. The project supported by portfolio companies with impact disclosure and footnotes is first quoted in the following article with an asterisk, indicating that the bridge has become the core infrastructure for protocol service providers and users to access encryption cases. This report aims to capture the current situation of bridging landscape, the impact of bridging on the wider encryption ecosystem, and the current key points and lessons can be classified into classes, native bridges, part bridges and bridge aggregators, which are usually the standard combinations with which users will interact to deposit and extract assets. About these chains that can be operated in a compatible way by a group of trusted participants or through decentralized consensus can also take advantage of the bridge compatibility with first-party security. Examples include that the first-party bridge is a network verifier between chains and acts as an intermediary. Most bridges follow this design. Variants include bridge aggregators that integrate the first two bridges listed above and provide the best routing across bridges for end-user business partners. Examples include that the main purpose of bridges is to account for data assets. Incremental provision of services between the location of this chain and the expected execution destination of data assets. The main use case is still asset transfer. Tokens in one chain are exchanged with tokens in another chain. Tokens in the chain are traded as tokens in the chain. There is an asset in the asset transfer chain, which is not native to the chain. The bridge can provide the service of sending the asset from chain to chain, for example, through a transaction from bridge to swap chain. The bridge will send the token and then perform the exchange. Including exchange and building on the bridge, which is responsible for exchange and integration of bridges. Others may include any type of call data or contract ownership, such as governance or multi-signature ownership. For example, the contract is deployed on many chains, but the core governance contract is located on the main network. The foundation would rather have one contract and execute messages to other chains in a one-to-many way instead of creating a governance contract bridge on each chain, which is usually used with its own bottom through the attraction on the chain or as a sign of liquidity usage. The success of the bridge contract is directly related to the holding of funds and can be used as a way to measure the bridge. According to the statement, from the famous third-party bridge to the famous third-party bridge, there is a traction of about 100 million US dollars based on volume and chain coverage. The volume of transactions is about 100 million US dollars, and the volume of transactions is about one trillion US dollars. The transaction aggregator usually routes transactions, so the transaction volume index is more suitable for the distribution between consumers and enterprises. The winning sign is the key indicator. Leading providers include and bridges are differentiated. According to the use case and distribution, there may be multiple winners. The nuances of security will depend on the preference of the demander. Most consumers who use bridges seem to prefer the cost of speed delay to the security smart contracts above the lowest feasible threshold. Most bridging attacks occur at the level of smart contracts. In most bridges, users lock funds in the chain contracts, and the bridge reads the chain contracts, minting coins on the chain contracts, and drawing access rights in the user's capital contracts. Misconfiguration of the limit may lead to hacker attacks, multiple signatures, and the control of the contract is entrusted to a group of trusted participants. These are usually operated by the project team and other trusted stakeholders. Developers can set their own settings, and they can also choose from the options menu set by other real-time repeaters. Chain security is achieved by reaching a consensus through proof of rights. Distribution will try to make use of existing partner channels and back-end infrastructure. Facility wallet will try to become the infrastructure behind the bridging function of the existing wallet portfolio aggregator, for example, the front-end wallet will have some form of bridging support, for example, the front-end wallet will usually establish a website portal in which any user can connect to the wallet bridge. Examples of funds include and will include a deposit function, which uses bridging in the background, so users do not have to jump back and then jump back to use the application, which can be regarded as the above abstraction. Version but natively supported by developers in the application programming interface. Examples include the developer platform. Many bridge companies will use the existing distribution of the developer platform to enable examples including the ecosystem. Although all major third-party bridges cover all the same chains, they will try to gain the first-Mover advantage by investing resources in a specific chain developer ecosystem. The reason is that the product feature set needs to be more advanced to achieve differentiation, so it is in the ecosystem. It is easier to expand within the framework of virtual machine intelligent contract, which is dedicated to ecosystem and so on. Considering the early participation of wormholes, existing users have found that their ecosystem coverage is very wide, and the attractive growing ecosystem coverage is very wide because they have the ability to provide compatible transactions. A new chain store with a data point is used, for example, after the first day of coverage, most providers can provide services for other ecosystems. Because they are engaged in abstract business, they usually need to carry out product function sets. Customized smart contracts work to support specific use cases, so the bridge team usually eventually opens up a niche market to find specialized vertical areas. Examples include payment, for example, and swapping what we care about. The multi-chain standard will become an important data point that affects the bridge. It is a standard designed to help realize the multi-chain before it is released. Because of the lack of support for the original, it will use the bridge version because it must approve and add the original for each new chain on its roadmap. The support of the raw version will change from a bridged version to a standard example on the new chain because the chain wants to get support. An example may be the influence of the bridge on the bridge, which will lead to the fragmentation of liquidity. Because the bridge between the chain and the bridge has established the dependence on the bridge operators, the protocols of various ecosystems will integrate it into an asset and it will become more difficult to release. When a new chain goes online, it will deploy a token contract that meets the standards. When it is ready to go online, it can take over the implementation of the support. Basically, the new contract has backward compatibility to meet the subsequent standards. An example is. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=61134