一文速览zksync和solana创始人对生态底层逻辑的理解

It is a rare trick for the author's source and the two founders to choke each other on Twitter. Their understanding of the underlying logic of ecology will determine the ecology and the direction of ecology. This is an important information that every investor must read carefully. The following discussion originated from a push by a fund manager. No matter what you think about reaching the expansion limit today, you are at least trying and giving up the expansion a long time ago. The actual daily usage has exceeded and has been stagnant in the past three years. They have not. The founder who has a foothold wrote a long reply, which is only nine Niu Yi hairs to the global demand. The Internet can't rely on a single server to run. The Internet can't rely on a single huge blockchain to run, no matter how fast it is or how much dispersion it is willing to sacrifice. The ultimate goal is the odd number of zero-knowledge proofs. Thousands of unlicensed hyperchains have thousands of zero-knowledge proofs in each chain, which are recursively aggregated into a block and finally confirmed in the most decentralized justice. Every transaction in the millions of transactions in Ethereum is verified by every user on every smart phone in less than a second. If every user can't verify it, is it really a blockchain? Zero knowledge proves that it has achieved unlimited expansion without compromise. Yes, in the long run, we can also solve the problem of data availability. Most of the data will be hosted by end users, but the user experience and liquidity will be fragmented. Every user of these chains will be able to connect with other chains in a few seconds. There is no additional cost or trust assumption for any contract or user to interact seamlessly. Just a wallet can confirm it immediately. Similar to today, we can send e-mail from any mailbox to any other mailbox. Liquidity will flow freely between zero-knowledge super chains without trusting the verifiers or bridges between these chains. Some of them will be private and privacy-protected, and operated by banks and financial institutions, but they can still interoperate seamlessly with the rest of the ecosystem. This will Create an effect for liquidity that is several times larger than the network effect seen by the world in the chain. Netizens ask what do you think is the reason why people can't see this? Do you think this is just an economic reason or are there other factors that we haven't explained clearly? What do you think of the reply and founder? Regardless of factions, let's strengthen each other's arguments. I admire the firm commitment to its arguments and promote the boundaries that a single synchronous blockchain engine can handle. Its innovation is excellent, especially in parallel implementation. In terms of line and local cost market, this is something that all tier 2 solutions must embrace. There is some truth in this statement. Different tier 2 solutions may lead to fragmentation of user experience and liquidity. We will start with an independent and infinitely scalable zero-knowledge tier 2 ecosystem. The initial super chain will be infinitely scalable. They will be able to interoperate seamlessly but not with or, but as long as there is a successful zero-knowledge ecosystem, it will be enough to realize this vision. Finally, we will have. It is possible to establish a single bridge contract on the Ethereum, and join the discussion to connect all solutions. It is really great to reply to zero knowledge, but they can't solve the hot issues of the database. If they can be solved, there will be about hundreds of millions of dollars in database income to be used, and they can't spread information to the world faster. The two problems that they are trying to solve are to synchronize the state at the speed of light and deal with as many concurrent hot issues as possible in a single atomic state machine. If it helps to solve these problems, Problems will definitely use them. They are only by-products of efficient channel utilization, but they are not the target reply. You have not strengthened my argument. Yes, you can build an efficient database state synchronization engine to handle it, but how should users of this system verify it? By using zero knowledge, it is proved that synchronous processing is not feasible, but asynchronous processing has no problem. It takes seconds to verify that those who get higher value than running a complete node will do so. The whole node will need a huge computing power of a computing cluster. Thank you. I'd rather choose to verify the zero-knowledge certificate on the mobile phone. It may only take less than a core to reply to a million. You can verify the zero-knowledge certificate on the mobile phone. It's really good, but as I said, I care about the maximum concurrent hotspot and synchronizing all the States at the speed of light. Anyway, this is a high-bandwidth and highly available system. It's very superficial to say that replying to a million is the core, because today's peak is only and I need it in the actual use of millions. How many states should be kept in the database to maintain this speed? The reply transaction can occupy more computing units or fewer computing units. The system only needs to keep the number matching the states it is processing at the same time. The number of states used by each transaction loaded on one core at a time is less than what we are debating here. What is the most effective atomic single state machine to achieve the fastest global synchronization speed? If zero knowledge proves helpful in this respect, it will use it. The purpose of the system lies in it. Function: If a zero-knowledge proof system can't complete that specific task, it doesn't matter whether it can handle it or not. If it overlaps with other systems, it doesn't matter whether users will choose the most effective solution for them. The argument is that if the most efficient implementation of the state synchronization system is around, then you definitely need to use zero-knowledge proof to realize the real global verifiable computing scale. I think it can significantly improve throughput through parallelization and recursive proof aggregation. Another user questioned the argument that users with complete nodes put forward unrealistic demands. Another user asked what you would do if you used it as a data availability layer at the same time within any hour window in 2008. A single hyperlink instance continued to maintain more than any other second-tier solution during the inscription craze. At the peak period, it was measured that today you only need to deploy an additional hyperlink to achieve it. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=60957