AW Frontier：链上游戏风险市场的现状

With the growing interest of venture capital companies in full-chain games and the autonomous world, I find myself wondering what it's like to raise funds as a team to build a full-chain game. One of the benefits of operating in such a small ecosystem, especially an ecosystem where everyone is very open, is that you can talk to the team easily, so in order to help answer my questions, I contacted several well-known founders of full-chain games, including and, today, I will share the main gains of these conversations. It is almost impossible to get a deep understanding of the situation of the whole game venture capital market in the chain from a new perspective. Let's get to the point directly. The interest of investors has been growing continuously until recently. As he said when describing his experience of trying to do this for Minters, it is very difficult for a game company that is completely in the chain to raise funds in 2008. Investors have not seen how valuable they are. Some of them have the attitude of you. Are you building a casino? It is hard to understand the idea of putting games on the blockchain. However, the trend is changing, and investors' interest in full-chain games is growing. There are several factors that have promoted this emotional change. Some games have pointed out the direction. Full-chain games like Dark Forest have found products suitable for the market, and at the same time, they have helped to prove that the industry can create novel experiences. Technology has improved in this field in developing infrastructure suitable for hosting full-chain games and realizing unique game mechanisms. Great progress has been made, including the proof of horizontal game engine framework, and the continuous development of business models. People pay more attention to the construction of permanent games and games as a service rather than products that only profit at the point of sale. Later, we will introduce in detail the awareness-raising and investors' deeper understanding of what is happening in the whole chain game ecosystem, which helps to understand this. All this has been translated into the increase of venture capital activities and the total amount of funds raised by teams such as. The popularity of permanent games with a value of 10,000 US dollars is an important gain from my conversation with investors. As mentioned above, game as a service refers to a video game designed for continuous updating and content distribution, which allows players to participate in this model for a long time, allowing developers to continuously improve their games according to player feedback, establish a continuous relationship with players and generate regular income levels through subscription mechanism or microtransactions. An example of a permanent game is World of Warcraft players. We haven't seen how or whether this model can be implemented in full-chain games. However, due to the success of its attributes and the permanence of the blockchain, the potential of implementing the model in full-chain games is helpful to improve the enthusiasm and willingness of encryption native investors to invest in this industry. It will be easier if you are building infrastructure to raise funds. Another common point in my conversation is that it is easier to raise funds for projects that build infrastructure besides games. He shared his views on this trend, saying that my feeling about the game is that it is strange now, but many venture capital companies are hesitant to bet on a single game or studio and regard the combination of game infrastructure as a safer bet because of the risk. If we stand in the perspective of venture capital companies, it is easy to understand why many people want to vote like this. Capital infrastructure can be diversified, because the risk is not only dependent on the success or failure of a specific game or team, but scattered in multiple games or even the whole ecosystem. In order to understand more background information, I find it interesting to compare the role of the game engine on the whole chain. Our main argument is that the game engine on the whole chain is more like an aggregator, not that is to say, the more ecosystems you support, the more mobile active players you have, which is more like an aggregation. On the whole, according to my research, the risk market of games on the whole chain seems to be heating up slowly. Although investors' interest is not strong, it is growing, especially for projects aimed at building permanent games and infrastructure. This is very encouraging, but there are still obvious challenges, such as the implementation of the model. In addition, of course, not everyone can build infrastructure outside the game. Finally, I want to leave some feasible suggestions for potential founders. One of them is that if you want to raise funds, please do it from cryptocurrency native venture capital. As said, it is best to raise funds from cryptocurrency native companies that understand the construction agreement, not traditional venture capital companies or specific game companies unless they have a link to the original text of the dedicated cryptofund. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=60810