为什么LSD协议会是Metis layer2生态发展的根基？

If the platform of public chain is the ecological foundation, then the protocol of public chain must hold the lifeblood of ecological development. Recently, when the decentralization process is still in full swing, it has begun to spare no effort to support the development of the protocol. Its fundamental logic is here, which will undoubtedly be the foundation of the ecological 10,000-meter-high building. Next, let me talk about my opinion. The goal of the protocol is to let ecological users pledge the original platform to mining nodes, thus promoting the safe and stable operation of the public chain platform, which is equivalent to the use of the protocol. The basic threshold of decentralized nodes to be built by households to support the normal operation of nodes and allow users to participate in the mining process is 10,000. For node operators, the cost is huge. If the assets are raised by agreement first and then the corresponding pledge quota is given, it can not only lower the threshold for nodes to participate in decentralized mining, but also provide primary income for pledged users. In the long run, it will form a positive incentive for flywheel users to pledge to lower the threshold of decentralization, and the pledge rate will increase. The stronger consensus on chain security drives asset prices to rise. To some extent, users want to pledge more participation in the development agreement in order to further consolidate the decentralized mining system. Of course, there will be corresponding quota restrictions for participation to ensure the balance of comprehensive capabilities such as node technology operation market and avoid excessive concentration of resources, which violates the fundamental essence of decentralization. In essence, this is similar to the logic of the public chain development platform. Miners can lend mining income assets to the lending platform to obtain stable coins to pay the electricity bills needed for mining. The derivative financial game of mining costs can be normal without selling assets. As a native platform, the positioning is the first agreement on the platform. The native goal brings real liquidity pledge income sources to the platform. Why do you say that the impact war that was launched before promised users that in addition to the exchange of points, the biggest point of view is that the agreement pledged by users can gain income to empower the ecology. In this scenario, the native students from across the chain can be absorbed and then taken by the platform operation and maintenance parties. It is inevitable that people will be confused about the existence significance of pledge financing to obtain income. What if the agreement can directly undertake the possibility of obtaining stable income from the original assets? A platform like this not only has hematopoietic capacity, but also with the interoperability between them, the liquidity of more platforms will flood in. Wouldn't it be more logical to engage in a similar reward mechanism at that time? If the pledge of returning to the main network with the pledge of users is a unified asset financing behavior of the organization, users can't choose the most assets. When the feasibility of agreement pledge runs through, there will be a large number of retail investors to do liquidity overflow financing from various platforms, and their future imagination space should not be underestimated. In order to stimulate the development of ecological agreements, plans have been put forward to accelerate the growth of many agreements. In addition, this will continue to attract the rapid rise of agreements, including others. Following the development paradigm of Ethereum, the mechanism will inevitably lead to further refined management and decline of liquidity at some point. The emergence of protocols such as Ethernet Square has raised the pledge rate of the world to how much imagination space will it bring to the first-class protocols? Of course, the goal is to lock in greater liquidity. The advantage lies in the two-way demand of the protocols. The mature fundamentals of the positive flywheel will be like the fundamentals of conveying the security consensus capability of the Ethernet Square main network to emerging chains. The value must be implemented in the end to be stable enough to build a decentralized economy that exists exclusively for the original, which is different from it. Traditionally, he thought that the model of token governance was continuously exerting its self-hematopoietic ability in the process of ecological construction. If it only stayed in the stage of governance, it would be difficult to effectively empower it. So, everyone should have sensed that the platform of preempting the original and the future actually had hidden ambitions. At a time when many people were opening up and sharing modular technology components to expand their territory, they built a set of ecological mobility sharing components, trying to modularize a native decentralized economy. It is the cornerstone to determine the subsequent growth of ecology and the key to judge whether the second wave of value growth will come. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=60791