Playmint主题演讲：在Downstream游戏中扩展“共享现实”

Hi, I'm one of the co-founders. We are developing a game called, this is what it will look like when it is finished, but the appearance of the game is still slightly different at present. The main reason is that we don't want users to mistakenly think that the game has been developed, so we deliberately keep a low profile. It is a post-singularity civilization simulator. I will further explain what this means later. Our development process is still in a very early stage, but one thing you can do is to expand each other's shared reality. One of the goals is to create. A game allows players to jointly build new things that we can't imagine. People in the game industry will say, Oh, you mean social games like that, while people in the encryption industry will say, Oh, you mean the combination without permission like that. Although we appreciate the above two concepts, we still don't think they can fully reflect our views, so today I'm going to talk about the decisions we have made or are making because we are trying to figure out how to expand the sharing of real social games. At present, the top three social games on the market are about to have one billion users, which is a very large number of users. Although it can't reach the scale of several billion users of social media applications, the scale of these games is actually very considerable because the number of users is often smaller. As the founder said, this shows that people prefer to actively create and express from the perspective of creators rather than passively consume, but the relatively pessimistic view is that most people will disappear. The content of the fee only comes from a small number of users, and the mainstream behavior on these platforms is still consumption rather than creation, but these criticisms are not the whole problem. It is true that most users of social platforms have created content at least once, so most users have tried to become creators, but the key problem of social games at present is that players can only create content that game developers have preset, and in terms of so-called shared space, their sharing degree is far less than that of people. What about the composability without permission? As said, people are more and more inclined to think that online games are composable without permission by default. People can not only create new content in your game, but also others can't restrict their creation. We even joked that we finally found the answer that developers can't do something. That is, yes, you can have some great articles on this topic, and the community I like very much. It is the best proof that these are feasible, but there are still obstacles to building on your products at present. Simply put, the threshold is too high and the incentive is too low. Can only engineers further innovate on existing products? Should users really integrate different computing systems? Is this the so-called middleware kingdom, that is, relying too much on middleware to realize the integration between different technologies, and the incentive to do so is too low, so many people say, well, if the foundation. Composability: It's great that I can get more users by continuing to build products, but if there are no users there now, it's better to make a new product by themselves than to continue to develop based on composability. So although many people think that the potential of composability without permission is amazing, we think that the current incentives are still far from enough, and we need democratic composability. Please imagine that if we have one billion wizards now and each wizard has the ability to expand the real world shared by each other, it will be What kind of scene will it be? Is it a game, a decentralized platform or an autonomous world? Although we are not 100% sure, we are considering some key questions, that is, who can become a wizard, what abilities these wizards have and what these wizards can do with them? Then who can become a wizard? We certainly hope that everyone can have the ability to become a wizard, not just developers. We want the combination of democratization to give everyone a chance. Trying this is a kind of composability that belongs to the people. In fact, we want to design the extended game itself as an organic part of the whole game experience, which leads us to discuss the importance of the builder's experience, which leads us to a series of thoughts. Here is our building manufacturing tool. When you create a new type of building here, you actually deploy an intelligent contract, which enables anyone in the world to build the same building. For engineers, we provide it. For users with non-engineering background, we have designed an intuitive graphical user interface to facilitate their operation, so we are also thinking deeply about how to improve the usability of the system, that is, the usability I said is higher than the powerful function. We hope that people can have the ability to change the way things operate, so the system needs to work in a way that people can understand, so the design style of materialization and metaphor will play an important role when digital physics is used. When we can find examples corresponding to real-world physics, it will be easier for users to understand that we are going to give wizards the ability. So what kind of ability does it mean to be a wizard? I mentioned that online multiplayer games don't always provide a shared space as they seem. As a practitioner from the traditional game industry, I think it is necessary to point out that the game is cheating to keep your fun to some extent because the original intention of the game is to let play. Happy at home, if you are no longer having fun, you will stop the game and do something else, which is quite different from the background of a game in which a player is trapped in an inescapable device. Therefore, game design is under strong evolutionary pressure. They either adjust the difficulty as much as possible to meet the limit of your tolerance for setbacks or simply bring you pleasure, but a world does not guarantee that you will always win, right? It is much more difficult to realize this kind of manipulation in shared space. Although it can provide the best experience for some types of games, you don't want to passively accept dopamine. Your goal is to become a real wizard, isn't it? Therefore, our goal is to cultivate you into a powerful wizard. For this reason, we need to implement some key measures in the game first, including automatically loading plug-ins and realizing simple rules of digital physics, so that many games can support expansion, but few games like us allow players to expand a single shared real space while playing games, just like players interact in the same virtual space. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=60746