为什么ENS之争 Eth.Link很重要

The author's deputy editor-in-chief of Consensus Magazine translated Shanouba Bitcoin Trading Network and the team that developed the key wallet link infrastructure Ethereum name service at the end of the domain name dispute finally reached a settlement with its potential competitors on the crucial domain name access right. As part of the settlement, it was obvious that a derogatory clause was agreed to restrict it from publicly expressing its position in the legal dispute over the domain name in the past month. Although I can't comment on this, I can do it. Analysis is a middleware blockchain company, and most people only heard about it because of the lawsuit with. Although the project was purchased at the auction in 2000 for US dollars and has the legal claim, it is better to give up control of it after knowing its sale. In the newspaper in 2000, it was written that it was squatted by us. It is not clear whether the company really owned the service or what they intend to do with it, because they successfully obtained the right from Yali after realizing that they lost access to the key gateway. The judge of the federal district court in Phoenix, Arizona obtained a preliminary injunction to stop the transfer and take back the domain name. In a recent proposal for reconciliation, the CEO of the laboratory wrote that this in itself opened a period of slow litigation through the court. This slow and almost unnecessary litigation was because it never really owned the moral right of the service. Since 2000, the laboratory has been serving as a public gateway of the Ethereum community to provide access to the chain and data for traditional network services. However, these data are incompatible with the traditional website or the domain name service structure, and the tortuous process of domain name disputes leads to the loss of access to the domain name because the domain name was registered by the developer and former employee of Ethereum Foundation and was arrested for giving a speech on the public blockchain in North Korea, and the domain name registration could not be renewed during his imprisonment for months. The complexity of this incident lies in the fact that the lawsuit was originally based on the original validity of the registration of network registrars and hosting companies until June, but was unilaterally recognized after the domain name was not renewed in June. The domain name has expired and was illegally sold to the plaintiff in the same month, although the domain name actually has an annual validity period, which is alleged in the complaint, thus depriving the plaintiff of his livelihood. This sale will make a valuable cryptocurrency network unable to operate normally and recklessly risk exposing it to a large number of malicious actors. In addition, the cited terms of service say that they should have been allowed to re-register the domain name on behalf of them, but they did not reply to many requests, which is not the direct cause of the auction of the domain name. The act of returning the domain name at a certain price is between cybersquatting and asking for rent. In addition, it is not clear whether it is necessary to include the lawsuit that is mainly aimed at the behavior, and there is no response to the request for comment. The whole incident seems to be unfair to some extent. For example, it seems to be ridiculed in many aspects. For example, we wrote in the newspaper that we are actually suing us in the name of unfair competition. We have done so well in this respect that it is unfair. We also submitted the preliminary rejection of the lawsuit and the withdrawal of the return. This is to continue the adventure of holding the domain name. Now the community will pay US dollars plus US dollars in legal fees to solve this problem. Although the cryptocurrency industry has long passed the stage of avoiding litigation only by ideological commitment and firm belief, this debate has indeed aroused people's doubts about what is happening and the subsequent impact on the domain name dispute. In a recent interview, it was pointed out that the wider network cannot be naively ignored, which is why it is still in court technically. This is indeed the reason why we cooperate with the court at the same time. This is also the reason why the domain name is so important. The bridge between the blockchain and the traditional network is priceless. However, this unpleasant dispute is not the last time to resort to law because of the ownership of intangible assets. To be fair, it is the most commonly used way to convert the alphanumeric blockchain address into a human-readable name. However, in principle, the two registered companies do not argue in court. In line with the essence of decentralization, it is gratifying that this dispute shows the effectiveness of governance. The settlement plan is submitted to the community for voting, in which the right to vote agrees to settle and approve the reimbursement of legal fees. However, in a strange way, this public voting has also damaged the litigation strategy, and only the right to vote supports the continuation of the lawsuit. As the domain name expert wrote in the newspaper, because the settlement of the lawsuit against and still needs to be finalized before giving up, it will be in a favorable position to obtain it in view of public opposition to the continuation of the lawsuit. Desired conditions In an ideal world, this lawsuit should have helped to prove the value and necessity of decentralized digital identity, but in the end it seems that everything is controlled by centralized entities. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=60387