如何定义 Bitcoin L2 以及包容性视角的 L2

The author's recent definition has caused a debate about what is right. This question has also been debated in the community. How to define it in the end can be analyzed from the technical and ecological perspectives. I advocate a technical perspective definition with an inclusive perspective. If it is to be defined technically, the key is to make it obvious and different from the centralized solution. I think there are two key points that do not create new block spaces. The technical solution to create new block spaces is essentially to use it. Now that data is available and the technical solutions to safely create new block spaces are essentially, it is obvious that the market is not only defined from a technical point of view, but also from an ecological point of view. When defining from an ecological point of view, we are concerned about how to use or inherit the provided capabilities. We take the example to analyze what assets can be inherited and expanded. This is a story that is all being told. How to make trillions of assets generate additional use scenarios, whether it is trading. Whether it is pledge or pledge, there is a great imagination, and it takes a bridge to make the assets of one blockchain system trade in another system. The key problem here is how to make users trust this bridge and ensure the safety of assets. From this perspective, all the schemes to create use scenarios for assets through bridges can be understood as even as a completely centralized managed bridge, which ensures security through legal supervision, so what everyone is entangled in is not decentralization but trust. Decentralization scheme can reduce users' trust cost and bring opportunities to new projects, but how to construct a safe decentralized bridge is a key problem. Can we use other features to improve the security of this bridge? In addition, with the development of the extension protocol on the Internet, there will be more and more new assets, whether it is the extension protocol on or above, and how to make this bridge extensible and support new asset types quickly is also a huge challenge. The value of a blockchain network has not been fully exerted, and this wave of inscription fever can be understood as defining an extensible data format standard for the value discovery protocol as the data available layer, so that the analysis, display and exchange of engraved data have a unified set of expansion protocols and how to make full and effective use of the blockchain space is an exploration direction. The programming ability of the network is limited, and its programming ability for assets is mainly manifested as follows The complexity of three kinds of locks, time lock and private key lock, can be an order of magnitude, so this scheme is possible, but the key challenge in this respect is that they are stateless, their unreadable state and accumulated state can only rely on the script that can be used by the input, and arbitration is still a direction to be explored. Another angle is cryptography innovation, including the construction of game mechanism based on key exchange to ensure security protocols, such as lightning network and extractable one-time signatures. However, the details of its implementation have not yet been announced, but the market has been looking forward to it very much, including the following kinds of time stamps, random numbers, ownership blocks and new assets and information attached to it. Then we can analyze different expansion protocols and how the project expands from the above perspective. In view of its limited programming ability, one way is to transfer assets to an environment with stronger programmability, such as opening up new ones for assets The representative of the application scenario in this respect lies in whether the design of the bridge can make use of the scalability of the provided security cross-chain scheme to extend an intelligent contract layer to realize one-time sealing, and at the same time, it also uses the block space to announce the transaction commitment, which provides a new programming environment. Its advantage is that the perfect matching model does not rely on the global state to ensure privacy, but at the same time, its shortcomings limit the correct characteristics of its programming scenario in this direction. The model provides a richer programming mode. The computing inscription mode can be understood as a new computing model. The definition of assets on the chain is guaranteed by the calculation under the chain, and at the same time, it can provide the global status inscription. It can be understood as an asset between and. If the protocol is built into the migration mechanism between, it can realize the circulation of assets between and. If the generation and verification logic of the inscription assets is engraved on the code, it is also an expansion plan for programming ability, such as Stacking, if all the analytic and additional states of the extension protocol are realized through smart contracts, and at the same time, allows developers to deploy applications to the application through smart contracts, it is equivalent to providing a new smart contract layer. Before this scheme, I called this mode smart, but the concept gives people the impression that it is read-only, so I used a new word to refer to all the extension schemes that contain all the states, and it completely inherited all the states. In this case, the application can read what is on the platform. Assets that have a state and can also create a new state and sum can be stacked and combined to form new assets, and the security can be guaranteed through modular schemes. We will write a detailed description about this concept later. In fact, all the above schemes can cooperate with each other through the combination mode. If we abandon the abstract understanding of the specific implementation, we will find that it should be a continuous spectrum, and all the solutions in the middle zone from the leftmost to the rightmost can include this spectrum. Within the scope, the two ends of this spectrum also represent two different growth modes, which are basically completely product-oriented and user-oriented, while the longer construction period gives priority to narrative and blueprint, while in the middle it will be a mixed growth mode. We don't have to dwell too much on what the real industries create, such as various technologies and solutions, and so on, which should be regarded as part of this spectrum. The industries explore the infrastructure needed by new applications through various permutations and combinations, but different projects. Different assumptions about the new application also determine its combination mode and growth mode. It may be a little to the left or a little to the right, and the future is uncertain. At this stage, it is difficult to assert that that mode will grow up, but one thing is certain. After so many years of exploration, the industry has a large scale and needs a large-scale middle layer to fill this gap. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=60262