全网最深入的比特币生态防钓鱼指南（Taproot 升级最新版）

At that time, people were immersed in the upsurge of Ethereum, and no one knew that it would be the most wealth-making upgrade. Together with the upgrade, it introduced new features to the network and indirectly expanded the block data, which was equivalent to the emergence of new assets such as the fuse of ecological explosion from year to date, and kept the transfer adoption rate basically at half or even above. However, the introduction of new assets and new features was accompanied by new security challenges. At present, the new asset ecology, which is different from the Ethereum ecology, has many things to be built and understood. I believe that many users are excited. After all, this often means the opportunity to get rich, but it also puts forward new requirements for users' awareness of safe operation. Otherwise, it is easy to lose money inexplicably, and even there have been accidents such as hackers' attacks caused by the misuse of signature types in the market. A brief analysis of the specific impact of ecological maximum protection of asset security and prevention of phishing escalation. Before talking about specific anti-phishing measures, we need to pave the way for the impact of escalation. In addition to indirectly promoting the prosperity of multi-asset ecology as mentioned earlier, the bottom of the transaction has actually undergone great changes, mainly two signatures and technologies. After the combination of these two signatures, hackers will have more room to play phishing. One is the signature. This upgrade has replaced the signature in the white paper. The technical feature of is that multiple signatures or public keys are aggregated into a work that used to require multiple signatures to be confirmed again and again. Now, it only needs to be verified once, which directly reduces the occupied space of signatures. One is technology. If the former is an aggregated signature, it is used to aggregate multiple scripts. For scripts, you can understand it as a limited intelligent contract of Bitcoin. At the same time, when submitting verification and unlocking costs, you only need to verify the spending conditions, and the occupied space of complex scripts with many conditions can be greatly reduced. These two technologies have the greatest impact on privacy, and at the same time, they also imply the space of security risks. After the transfer record is upgraded, all transfers look the same. In it, the transfer types are all displayed as addresses with the same length at the beginning. In the past, you can easily distinguish the difference between transferring to an ordinary address and transferring to a script address. Now, you can't tell the difference between transferring to an ordinary address and transferring to a script address before observing others spend one. It is also true for script miners to verify. It is only necessary to expose a spending condition of the script, and other branch scripts are unknown to the outside world. Obviously, the security infrastructure of the asset ecology on the first floor is far less powerful than that of Ethereum. There are many things that users need to understand and learn first, and the principle of fishing is not the same as that of Ethereum. Many phishing attacks may not be well understood by the whole market before they are discovered. For example, the signature of the market, the wallet is also the first security reminder that was added later. The old-fashioned basic skills of encryption security are to pay attention to the security of private key offline storage, whether it is a trusted website or not, and to protect computers from Trojan viruses, etc. However, in the new market, new projects may not have reached a consensus of trust, and users will want to rush. At this time, the next few tricks are particularly important. The second trick is to clearly input and output. Ethereum has a blind signature, which means that if the wallet is not parsed, you can only see a messy character that cannot be predicted. Knowing what will happen to the assets after signing, this will also cause the risk of losing coins. In Bitcoin, the input and output of a transaction and the corresponding transfer address of the input and output will be clearly defined, that is, where many coins have come from and where they have gone. When signing, the changes that will happen before and after the transaction will be clearly displayed in the wallet, so it is very important to check whether the input and output meet their own intentions and expectations. For example, if a hacker wants to fish away at one time. All your inscriptions will show in the input of the transaction that all your inscriptions have been put in, and the output will show that they have all gone to strange addresses. Take the inscription on the pending list as an example. When you hang one or more inscriptions in the market, the pop-up signature request will show that the input of the transaction is one of your inscriptions or multiple inscriptions, and the output will show how much bitcoin you will receive once the transaction is successful. Be careful. You can see bitcoin here. The current signature type of popular science, the only signature type that needs attention is and both of which mean that you only sign the input of the transaction, regardless of the output of the transaction. The safe signature type for the transaction inscription assets should be the one that can construct a complete transaction without trust, which is also the signature type used by the mainstream inscription trading market. Take the misuse of the signature before the market as an example. When you sign the inscription assets, you really see the correct input and output, that is. It is stipulated that I can also receive money from the input of the pending assets, but hackers can completely get this modification and the transactions submitted by the output will also be packaged by miners, which will eventually make you unable to receive the pending money. In short, it is because the signature type used only signs the input part, which eventually leads to the purchase of zero yuan. At present, mainstream eco-wallets, such as and, have supported highlighted reminders or prohibited signature types. If you see the relevant signature types, don't use them for non-special purposes. The fourth trick of using this signature is to be careful when using scripts. If a project or platform needs you to transfer assets to a script address, you should be extra careful. When signing, you will see that your assets went to a strange address in the output. According to the previous content, you will know that the upgraded script address is the same as the user's private key address. If thieves try to cheat the received assets with the private key address, they can directly transfer them away. If it is a real script address, it depends on whether they disclose their feet. If the whole content of this address is published incompletely, although users can sign and transfer assets normally when using it, one or more malicious unlocking conditions may be hidden, and all assets may be suddenly closed one day in the future. Even if they open the whole script, the wallet on the market at present does not have the function of verifying the integrity of the script and the correspondence of the output address, which requires users who know the technology to confirm or trust this project and team with their own algorithms. Fortunately, there is no need to use complex scripts for the current application of various inscription assets transactions. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=59234