UTXO同构绑定技术——扩容的新圣杯

The author's source isomorphism binding technology is a very important innovation in this round of ecological development. I have repeatedly indicated the importance and innovation of this technology. However, I found that many people still don't understand the significance of this technology. There are both technical cognition problems and ideological problems, so I wrote this article to explain my cognitive context and the necessity of judging the expansion. Let's first think about why such a problem needs to be expanded. It is the core problem of the necessity of network expansion. If it is not necessary, then the whole ecology is actually a false proposition. We can explain this problem from many aspects. For example, the decline of miners' income in half cycle requires more chain activities to improve their income, so as to maintain network security. More chain activities need to expand the ecology to promote the low level of the network, which cannot meet the needs of many scenarios. It is necessary to have a means to expand the network and make it more powerful. The network cost is very expensive and inconvenient. Large-scale popularization, especially with the rising price, will deviate from the original intention. The operation code that the network can provide is very limited, and only a few function definitions or combination operations can be realized. Moreover, the scripting language is not Turing, and it is extremely difficult to realize smart contracts. Therefore, a method is needed to make it have such characteristics that the data is completely open. Although similar technologies can be used to provide a certain degree of privacy, it is in most cases. In fact, if you want to write it, you will find that there are many reasons, maybe some reasons are not so sufficient, but these all reflect a problem, that is, the network really needs to expand. The general expansion will choose one or several of them as the goal, and then design a plan to achieve this goal. Take the common expansion plan as an example. The idea of the side chain is to build a chain by itself. Anchor in the form of multi-signing, and then have their own consensus mechanism on their own chain, and add some special setting links to realize the corresponding functions, such as adding script operation code, asset distribution function and the concept of privacy assets. The idea of lightning network is to use logical algorithm to realize safe and rapid interaction under a chain, and realize the possibility of large-scale universal payment. The idea of client verification is to use one-time sealing technology and offline technology to put data under the chain for operation, so that it can have both. The idea of the inscription class is based on the limited processing to realize the function of issuing assets and the compatibility of other enhanced functions according to the situation. Most of the ideas are alienated multi-sign bridges as the starting point, and then a compatible chain is built with a structure similar to the side chain, and the mature experience is used to build a modular landing application. The idea is the development path of the reference system, and the possible parts in the expansion are modular. The idea of layering, for example, is to use this limited opcode to build complex functions through ideas similar to circuits. Of course, there are other technical routes, and most new ideas are micro-innovations, but in general, after we understand these contexts, we can judge the core connotation of a new idea relatively quickly, and there are many debates in these developments. Of course, there will always be debates, such as whether the dispute between orthodoxy and unorthodoxy and the dispute between originality and non-originality should be beneficial. From the point of view of a technical researcher, I think it is unnecessary for anyone to foresee the future results, so following their own value judgment to choose the recognized technical route can turn out to be three. Among many routes, the form of cross-chain bridge is questioned to some extent because of its security, and the first-layer asset agreement is distressed because of its limited ability to expand and develop based on it, because of its bias towards complex construction. Setting a cycle but waiting for compatibility is considered by many insiders to be too unorthodox. Is there a method that can not only reflect the original nature, but also ensure the safety and high expansibility? This is the full name. This technology makes use of the homologous characteristics of the model and can map the target chain to another Turing complete chain through one-time sealing. This technology was put forward by the founder and put into practice. Let's take a closer look at such a concept description. First of all, both parties must be based on this point. There is no doubt that the chain may be non-Turing complete in principle, otherwise it can be expanded on this chain. Of course, even Turing complete isomorphism can realize the original asset mapping chain, because the mapping process needs chain constraints to verify the correctness of state calculation and the effectiveness of changing ownership. In principle, chain-based asset issuance agreements can adopt isomorphic form to make such mapping. Please read the above four items carefully and then you will find the horizontal. The description of being born is not an exaggeration. From the original point of view, it does not have any way to cross the chain bridge. It is very original. From the analytical point of view, the chain provides an open layer to provide a foundation for the construction of other modules. It is possible to achieve the same security as the chain from the security point of view. Of course, I am not particularly sure about this part. Although there are relevant theories that completely undertake the expansibility of the chain, that is to say, you can find an excellent balance point in the extensibility of the original security. His limitation is that you need to have such a chain and all kinds of components needed to realize the agreement. The narrative space of code four is promising in ecology. It can make the assets of the public chain with chain characteristics be mapped in the original way and then carry out various expansion and development on the chain. The specific context is as follows: Take the recent hot one as an example, a new layer of asset agreement can be mapped on the top, and at the same time, the second layer of assets can also form a layer of assets to further enhance legitimacy. Other layer asset agreements on the main network can also be isomorphic to the network in a way, which will greatly activate the funds deposited in various current layer asset agreements, so that they can have more usage scenarios and play methods to connect with other chains. Further, is there any other network that can also replace the network? Of course, it can be independent as an intermediate layer agreement. We can isomorphize the above asset agreements to other Turing complete chains, and each chain can improve and expand the technical agreements. Then, we not only have one layer asset on the network, but also many other chains have one layer asset agreement deposited on them. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=59217