pSTAKE 的战略布局：在多链生态中的市场优势

When the Ethereum circuit is in full swing, people will naturally think that there should be a broader market space based on the application chain ecology. After all, it is a scheme of the whole application chain environment. Yes, what is the theoretical view of the strategic card position and the potential market space? What is the business model? Next, I will talk about it in detail. My understanding is to provide a liquidity pledge service platform for public chains including Ethereum and other ecosystems. Specifically, users can put each chain. Direct deposit of native resources into the platform platform will pledge the user's assets to the node operators and then obtain the benefits. At the same time, the platform will cast the user's assets that can be directly used for ecological circulation and generate additional benefits in some applications. Because the user is allowed to directly pledge the native assets of each chain to the corresponding ones, it is necessary to do corresponding adaptation work for different chains. For example, chain users can immediately obtain tokens by pledging assets, and assets will be pledged on the chain in a safe and unmanaged way. Due to the need for pledge redemption, it can be initiated every day. In the worst case of a redemption request, it takes days for the user to complete the redemption chain. The pledge will be sent to the contract first. Every day, the automatic program will superimpose all the pledged assets and entrust them to the verifier. If the user needs to wait days to redeem the assets, of course, the user can also choose to change them directly to avoid waiting. In terms of business model, it is positioned as a liquid pledge management agreement, which needs to manage and adapt the pledge characteristics of each chain and participate in the corresponding protoplasm pledge and redemption process. Newly minted ones can be used in the whole process. At any time, the core of its business is to open up the liquidity of each chain across multiple chains and multi-protocol liquidity management platforms and gather it into a unified management platform to manage and digest it without sacrificing the original liquidity. Popular understanding is equivalent to building a liquidity sharing layer for the application chain ecology, through which users can share the liquidity of each chain and get the pledge income without being troubled by the lock-up period, and successfully realize the pledge of multiple benefits without sacrificing the chain pledge income. The liquidity in lock-up period has the value of multi-chain circulation, and the cross-chain interoperability based on cross-chain bridge realizes the circulation of assets among various heterogeneous chains. The cross-chain communication protocol is the technical basis for building a huge application chain ecology, which can transmit any type of data or assets so that heterogeneous chains can communicate with each other, and the realization of asset circulation is the key technology to realize cross-chain communication, which is used to manage users' asset status update in multiple chains and maintain a unified account book security. All the original assets in the chain are pledged on the original chain. The strategic card position is to build a public liquidity layer between multiple public chains, and as a liquidity management and supply platform, you can directly choose the high-quality nodes to cooperate with, and whoever has more strength and security guarantee, as a unified account management platform, you need to strictly screen the nodes and be responsible for the flow of their assets, because once the assets put on the public chain nodes are met, The whole liquidity platform should share and bear the losses. Of course, this is actually a better choice for users. The choice is equivalent to avoiding the possibility of lost assets. This is equivalent to another layer of guarantee for users facing a complex multi-chain environment. Theoretically, it can serve a wider application chain ecology including Ethereum, and most users can convert their pledged assets in any chain into corresponding ones once they are integrated, but it will not be engraved. Which application chain ecology will use the same set of standards, one ecology by one, to superimpose the liquidity of its own public layer. Only in this way can assets from various multi-chain environments enjoy the same asset liquidity improvement and become a liquidity solution across multiple chains. If the liquidity of individual chains is too large, some weak-liquidity ecosystems will inevitably become weak points. Although they can serve a wide range, a bowl of water will be flat, otherwise there will be a potential liquidity imbalance crisis. This is precisely because. He Mingming can serve a wider chain ecology, and tends to spread the market among large chains one by one. In fact, it is also necessary to do so. Generally speaking, the re-pledge track fever in Ethereum will have a long-term gain effect on the management of intensive public chain liquidity agreement, especially when the liquidity of Ethereum continues to penetrate outside the chain and the multi-chain environment becomes the focus. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=58540