人民法院案例库上线 一文梳理关于虚拟数字货币的全部案例

币圈资讯 阅读:33 2024-04-22 04:53:46 评论:0
美化布局示例

欧易(OKX)最新版本

【遇到注册下载问题请加文章最下面的客服微信】永久享受返佣20%手续费!

APP下载   全球官网 大陆官网

币安(Binance)最新版本

币安交易所app【遇到注册下载问题请加文章最下面的客服微信】永久享受返佣20%手续费!

APP下载   官网地址

火币HTX最新版本

火币老牌交易所【遇到注册下载问题请加文章最下面的客服微信】永久享受返佣20%手续费!

APP下载   官网地址

2024年2月27日,最高人民法院召开新闻发布会,宣布人民法院案例库正式上线并向社会开放。公众注册登录后就可以查阅。人民法院案例库的网址是:www.rmfyalk.court.gov.cn,也可以从最高人民法院官网首页的“人民法院案例库”图标直接点击进入。

截至目前,人民法院案例库共收录案件3711篇,刘扬律师通过检索梳理总结了关于虚拟数字货币的全部案件,并且整理了具体案件的链接以便查阅:

一、搜索“泰达币”(包含usdt),共出现3个案例,具体如下:

1.冯某诈骗案:虚拟货币的刑事属性

https://rmfyalk.court.gov.cn/dist/view/content.html?id=WQsjNG%252F5Geoq1Wt7%252FtWZ6S59LLw7SMflVi5wxkebRRE%253D&lib=ck&qw=%E6%B3%B0%E8%BE%BE%E5%B8%81

2.陈某等诈骗案:虚拟货币在刑法上的财产属性

https://rmfyalk.court.gov.cn/dist/view/content.html?id=peRCaVCG%252BSZAwFJHHuHC59CEekoNVstij%252Bv7KMawsLg%253D&lib=ck&qw=%E6%B3%B0%E8%BE%BE%E5%B8%81

3.陈某某等集资诈骗、非法吸收公众存款案:集资诈骗罪非法占有目的的认定

https://rmfyalk.court.gov.cn/dist/view/content.html?id=78Ha9RqyD%252FATlefPWtI4ia0ci1mwfKjo5LLMIWkz3%252Bo%253D&lib=ck&qw=%E6%B3%B0%E8%BE%BE%E5%B8%81

二、搜索“比特币”,共出现7个案例,其中新出现案例5个,具体如下:

1.张某抢劫案:强迫被害人购买比特币进而抢劫比特币并倒卖变现案件的处理

https://rmfyalk.court.gov.cn/dist/view/content.html?id=IperRGavUvssdbbK57ghjBtRXdvlbTi2nTPv0vF2GnM%253D&lib=ck&qw=%E6%AF%94%E7%89%B9%E5%B8%81

2.上海某公司诉北京某计算科技公司委托合同纠纷案:比特币“挖矿”行为效力的司法认定

https://rmfyalk.court.gov.cn/dist/view/content.html?id=Tes%252BImj9P4TrbUyt6%252BlFGA8poNRyuZBddO6ZB%252BohLTI%253D&lib=ck&qw=%E6%AF%94%E7%89%B9%E5%B8%81

3.指导性案例199号:高哲宇与深圳市云丝路创新发展基金企业、李斌申请撤销仲裁裁决案

https://rmfyalk.court.gov.cn/dist/view/content.html?id=6tHz24AAKwT%252F9glY7I9dr7njO5KuoN3SBoIcBBZVryw%253D&lib=zdx&qw=%E6%AF%94%E7%89%B9%E5%B8%81

4.陈某淳走私毒品、非法持有毒品案:走私国家管制的新精神活性物质的行为构成走私毒品罪

https://rmfyalk.court.gov.cn/dist/view/content.html?id=R5G%252BvRNManXoHqzBxA60bXTH%252Fh0IpWcysbK8yz7Rk%252BM%253D&lib=ck&qw=%E6%AF%94%E7%89%B9%E5%B8%81

5.王某诉陈某买卖合同纠纷案:“矿机”买卖合同效力及法律后果

https://rmfyalk.court.gov.cn/dist/view/content.html?id=X0UcRyr0RYqKb6hOnrld6%252Bcxx73EJ0DPwTK%252FqFaaW6U%253D&lib=ck&qw=%E6%AF%94%E7%89%B9%E5%B8%81

三、搜索“以太”,仅出现1个案例,没有新出现案例,具体情况如下:

四、搜索“虚拟货币”,共出现15个案例,其中新出现案例9个,具体情况如下:

1.罗某诉江西省吉安县发展和改革委员会、吉安县人民政府责令改正、行政复议及规范性文件审查案:责令虚拟货币“挖矿”个人整改行政行为的司法审查

https://rmfyalk.court.gov.cn/dist/view/content.html?id=94I8PTvHqemy7zgn3ZIq5JFwA8tLNr1cxQI%252FT0I%252FpC8%253D&lib=ck&qw=%E8%99%9A%E6%8B%9F%E8%B4%A7%E5%B8%81

2.丁某忠等非法吸收公众存款案:基于同一事实刑行竞合情形下应当优先退赔被害人

https://rmfyalk.court.gov.cn/dist/view/content.html?id=zL9FNfGRWHm%252BUzy0E0Dtn4OzjLTRkkN8%252BjZRaakKzdE%253D&lib=ck&qw=%E8%99%9A%E6%8B%9F%E8%B4%A7%E5%B8%81

3.陈某等人掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得案:网络支付结算型帮助行为“明知”的认定

https://rmfyalk.court.gov.cn/dist/view/content.html?id=ghLj5wjJyY8oKtulkH%252BwGZCRsOVlLCG04CGwLV9YPZw%253D&lib=ck&qw=%E8%99%9A%E6%8B%9F%E8%B4%A7%E5%B8%81

4.上海某公司诉北京某计算科技公司委托合同纠纷案:比特币“挖矿”行为效力的司法认定

https://rmfyalk.court.gov.cn/dist/view/content.html?id=Tes%252BImj9P4TrbUyt6%252BlFGAx5hC8Clmt9vzJky13Veog%253D&lib=ck&qw=%E8%99%9A%E6%8B%9F%E8%B4%A7%E5%B8%81

5.北京某科技有限公司、黄某侵犯著作权案:以营利为目的、未经著作权人许可复制发行他人享有著作权的计算机软件行为的刑事认定

https://rmfyalk.court.gov.cn/dist/view/content.html?id=3lxZiBRPxY%252BPYh9fBqjhfZ34HWlUGtZHJkH8xE5zyOg%253D&lib=ck&qw=%E8%99%9A%E6%8B%9F%E8%B4%A7%E5%B8%81

6.罗某某组织、领导传销活动案:被告人在组织、领导传销活动中投入资金发生损失,不影响对其行为性质的认定

https://rmfyalk.court.gov.cn/dist/view/content.html?id=iPmAGOsfHJ%252BkQNhqOn6Jq3dN4kgbsT4efjNHSHRydsw%253D&lib=ck&qw=%E8%99%9A%E6%8B%9F%E8%B4%A7%E5%B8%81

7.郑某某、彭某、羊某某开设赌场案:网络赌博的赌资数额计算

https://rmfyalk.court.gov.cn/dist/view/content.html?id=8szTyn2Dr3XK5s2gcyifbLwjntfDWPbQ7yYH3Pr50%252BA%253D&lib=ck&qw=%E8%99%9A%E6%8B%9F%E8%B4%A7%E5%B8%81

8.王某等人开设赌场案

https://rmfyalk.court.gov.cn/dist/view/content.html?id=8xyvnhtkGlvniQac3CIpjd6Ba2Gk6DD90T6AW52OC%252BU%253D&lib=ck&qw=%E8%99%9A%E6%8B%9F%E8%B4%A7%E5%B8%81

9.韩某某走私、贩卖、运输毒品、强奸、传授犯罪方法,张某某走私毒品、强奸案:意义不大

https://rmfyalk.court.gov.cn/dist/view/content.html?id=vxD1NctpOFIZp9B9jS%252BWn0R%252Fqoh2J%252F6Pv1Tr1TQWz4U%253D&lib=ck&qw=%E8%99%9A%E6%8B%9F%E8%B4%A7%E5%B8%81

五、搜索“虚拟币”,共出现8个案例,其中新出现案例1个,具体情况如下:

1.翁某某开设赌场案:利用网络棋牌平台开设赌场中“变相牟利”行为的认定

https://rmfyalk.court.gov.cn/dist/view/content.html?id=JhXmrSocfsGm54zaxzG55kPPvfe9%252FyxBHBMiquBGPlU%253D&lib=ck&qw=%E8%99%9A%E6%8B%9F%E5%B8%81

六、搜索“NFT”(包括数字藏品),共出现1个案例,具体情况如下:

1.深圳某文化创意有限公司诉杭州某科技有限公司侵害作品信息网络传播权纠纷案:NFT数字作品交易网络服务提供者的责任认定

https://rmfyalk.court.gov.cn/dist/view/content.html?id=XO5boHqsoW%252FR8lIrH84jw32kZRERQTSibFwBWPcqeHE%253D&lib=ck&qw=nft

律师语:能够入选最高人民法院新上线的《人民法院案例库》,说明案件足够典型,也会被全国法院参考借鉴,值得认真研究,稍后刘扬律师将对每一起案件进行细致分析,逐一撰写案例分析,以飨读者。


On April, the Supreme People's Court held a press conference to announce that the people's court case library was officially launched and opened to the public. After registering and logging in, you can check the website of the people's court case library, or you can directly click on the icon of the people's court case library on the home page of official website, the Supreme People's Court to enter the case library. Up to now, lawyer Liu Yang has summarized all the cases about virtual digital currency through retrieval and sorted out the links of specific cases in order to check a search. There are cases in which the amount of money is up. The details are as follows: the criminal attribute of virtual currency in Feng's fraud case, the property attribute of virtual currency in criminal law in Chen Mou's fraud case, the illegal absorption of public deposits by Chen's fund-raising fraud case, and the determination of the purpose of illegal possession. Two cases have appeared in search of bitcoin. One of the new cases is as follows: Zhang's robbery case forced the victim to buy bitcoin and then robbed it and resold it. A company in Shanghai sued a computing technology company in Beijing for entrustment. Judicial Determination of the Effectiveness of Bitcoin Mining in Contract Dispute CaseNo. Gao Zheyu and Li Bin, an enterprise of Shenzhen Yunsi Road Innovation and Development Fund, applied for revocation of the arbitration award case. Chen Mou Chun smuggled drugs, illegally held drugs and smuggled new psychoactive substances controlled by the state. The behavior constitutes the crime of smuggling drugs. Wang v. Chen Mou, the dispute over the sale contract of mining machines, the effectiveness and legal consequences. There were only one case of searching for ether, but there were no new cases. The details are as follows: four cases of searching for virtual currency. The specific situation of the newly emerging cases is as follows: Luo Mou v. Development and Reform Commission of Ji 'an County, Jiangxi Province, Ji 'an County People's Government ordered to correct administrative reconsideration and normative document review case, ordered virtual currency mining individual to rectify the judicial review of administrative behavior, Ding Mouzhong and other cases of illegally absorbing public deposits based on the same fact. In the case of overlapping criminal acts, priority should be given to restitution of the victim Chen Mou and others to cover up the case of concealing the proceeds of crime, and a company in Shanghai was knowingly identified as a company v. Beijing. Judicial determination of the effectiveness of bitcoin mining behavior in a contract dispute case entrusted by a computing technology company; Criminal determination of the behavior of copying and distributing computer software that others enjoy copyright without the permission of the copyright owner in a case of copyright infringement by a technology company in Beijing; The loss of the defendant's investment in organizing and leading pyramid schemes does not affect the determination of the nature of his behavior; the amount of gambling money in the case of opening a casino by Zheng Moumou, Peng Moumou and Yang Moumou is counted. Counting the case of Wang and others opening a casino, Han Mou smuggling, selling and transporting drugs, raping and teaching criminal methods. The case of Zhang Moumou smuggling and raping drugs is of little significance. There are five cases of searching for virtual currency, of which the new cases are as follows: Weng Moumou opened a casino and used the online chess platform to open a casino. The identification of disguised profit-making behavior. Six cases of searching including digital collections are as follows: a cultural and creative company in Shenzhen v. a technology company in Hangzhou infringed on the information dissemination of works. The responsibility of the network service provider of digital works transaction in the case of power dispute. The lawyer's language can be selected into the case database of the newly-launched people's court in the Supreme People's Court, which shows that the case is typical enough and will be referenced by the national courts. It is worthy of serious study. Later, lawyer Liu Yang will make a detailed analysis of each case and write a case analysis one by one for readers. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

文字格式和图片示例

注册有任何问题请添加 微信:MVIP619 拉你进入群

弹窗与图片大小一致 文章转载注明 网址:https://netpsp.com/?id=57471

美化布局示例

欧易(OKX)最新版本

【遇到注册下载问题请加文章最下面的客服微信】永久享受返佣20%手续费!

APP下载   全球官网 大陆官网

币安(Binance)最新版本

币安交易所app【遇到注册下载问题请加文章最下面的客服微信】永久享受返佣20%手续费!

APP下载   官网地址

火币HTX最新版本

火币老牌交易所【遇到注册下载问题请加文章最下面的客服微信】永久享受返佣20%手续费!

APP下载   官网地址
可以去百度分享获取分享代码输入这里。
声明

1.本站遵循行业规范,任何转载的稿件都会明确标注作者和来源;2.本站的原创文章,请转载时务必注明文章作者和来源,不尊重原创的行为我们将追究责任;3.作者投稿可能会经我们编辑修改或补充。

发表评论
平台列表
美化布局示例

欧易(OKX)

  全球官网 大陆官网

币安(Binance)

  官网

火币(HTX)

  官网

Gate.io

  官网

Bitget

  官网

deepcoin

  官网
关注我们

若遇到问题,加微信客服---清歌

搜索
排行榜
扫一扫,加我为微信好友加我为微信好友