虚拟货币相关内容会加入新修订的刑诉法吗?

币圈资讯 阅读:24 2024-04-22 04:40:55 评论:0
美化布局示例

欧易(OKX)最新版本

【遇到注册下载问题请加文章最下面的客服微信】永久享受返佣20%手续费!

APP下载   全球官网 大陆官网

币安(Binance)最新版本

币安交易所app【遇到注册下载问题请加文章最下面的客服微信】永久享受返佣20%手续费!

APP下载   官网地址

火币HTX最新版本

火币老牌交易所【遇到注册下载问题请加文章最下面的客服微信】永久享受返佣20%手续费!

APP下载   官网地址

作者:刘正要律师

今天看到几个微信群里都在转一位全国人大代表的提案——将虚拟货币列入《刑事诉讼法》第144条,修改后的表述为:“人民检察院、公安机关根据侦查犯罪的需要,可以依照规定查询、冻结犯罪嫌疑人的存款、汇款、债券、股票、基金份额、虚拟货币等财产。有关单位和个人应当配合。”

相较于修改之前,增加了“虚拟货币”的内容。单看这个并列似乎是将虚拟货币和法币(存款)放在同等地位看待了,但是在中国大陆现有的虚拟货币监管政策下,刘律师的第一反应是:这怎么可能!?

通过仔细研究了法制网对于该人大代表提案的具体报道后,刘律大概了解该代表提案的背景是:涉案虚拟货币司法处置问题

?code=M2JjNTQ3Y2UzZDMxNjRiZjllOWY3Y2RkOWRmOWEyMTdfa3h1azZpZmllOFYxQThiUHFYcEFzYXZTY1FXRVdaenhfVG9rZW46QUNIWGJKb2Jkb05ySlR4UklxeWM5cGY4bnhiXzE3MTAwNTE1ODI6MTcxMDA1NTE4Ml9WNA

熟悉刘律的朋友应该知道,我之前对此做过不少研究,还写过几篇文章。在以十部委“9.24通知”(《关于进一步防范和处置虚拟货币交易炒作风险的通知》)等文件为代表的监管政策下,在国内所有的虚拟货币和法币的兑换业务均为非法金融活动,这其中当然也包含公安机关或者所谓虚拟货币处置公司进行虚拟货币和法币的兑换活动——即使这种处置是为了推进刑事案件的办理。

所以,当下公安机关在侦办刑事案件过程中,一旦涉及到虚拟货币类案件,涉案的虚拟货币无论是作为犯罪工具,还是违法所得,公安机关一律都委托给第三方处置公司进行涉案虚拟货币的变现操作,避免自己出面直接违反“9.24通知”的规定;当然,第三方处置公司也不会傻乎乎就自己上马就干,其往往会再委托境外的处置公司进行涉案虚拟货币的处置,境外变现后再通过合法甚至不合法的渠道将资金回流到境内,再转入公安机关的财政专户作为刑事案件的涉案资产。

?code=OTVjY2UzZTZhMjBkMWQ2OThiZDkxMGRkMjM3YmZkMzZfVWp5R05pWjJoU3U4YW9kZmVZS0tDWHdERGg4TnRvc09fVG9rZW46VG1tNGJCamx2b1djUDJ4dlVuSWNsWmFjbmliXzE3MTAwNTE1ODI6MTcxMDA1NTE4Ml9WNA

相较于传统刑事案件中的涉案财物一般是等到法院阶段由法院执行局进行拍卖;涉虚拟货币类刑事案件中,基于虚拟货币的特殊性,当下的司法实践是一般在侦查阶段就进行变现操作,然后再将虚拟货币变现后的资产随案移送由法院处置,个中原因在此文刘律就不再赘述了,感兴趣的朋友可以看这几篇文章(详见刘律gzh)。在公安侦查阶段就处置财物,至少存在以下几个问题:

一是法律法规依据不足。虽然公安机关的规定中,允许对于一些特殊的涉案财产进行先行处置,如《公安机关涉案财物管理若干规定(2015修订)》第21条规定了:“市场价格波动大的债券、股票、基金份额等财产和有效期即将届满的汇票、本票、支票等,权利人明确的,经其本人书面同意或者申请,并经县级以上公安机关主要负责人批准,可以依法变卖、拍卖,所得款项存入本单位唯一合规账户。”虚拟货币虽然符合市场价格波动较大这一要素,但是虚拟货币毕竟不是“债券、股票、基金份额”等财产,更不是汇本支等凭证。根据国家的监管政策,最多可以将虚拟货币称作“虚拟商品”,况且我国也不承认虚拟货币交易所的合法地位(在中国开设虚拟货币交易所,或境外的虚拟货币交易所向中国境内提供服务,均属于非法金融活动),那么从逻辑上或法理上说,涉案虚拟货币是不能被变现的。

二是涉案虚拟货币的查、冻、扣等强制措施无合适的制度安排。虚拟货币基于其特殊性,存放在钱包里的虚拟货币只能通过私钥开启,而存放在交易所的虚拟货币往往需要境外交易所的配合才行冻结。当下公安的惯常做法一般是将犯罪嫌疑人指定居所监视居住后,通过办案人员孜孜不倦的普法教育、苦心教导,使得犯罪嫌疑人“幡然悔悟”而主动提交私钥并配合将虚拟货币转至侦查人员控制的钱包中。这里面会不会涉及到刑讯逼供,刘律自己的案子里目前是没有遇到,但是我们在网络上有看到有些案件中当事人家属或律师发声,称犯罪嫌疑人在指居期间遭受了刑讯逼供。我们假设一种可能,如果犯罪嫌疑人无论被采取何种措施,都不肯吐露涉案虚拟货币钱包的私钥(密码),此时该怎么办?

三是现行的涉案虚拟货币变现模式容易不受监督,导致利益输送。这一点刘律就不展开写了(文章容易被封),只提一点,江苏盐城某公安领导、浙江某家虚拟货币司法处置公司被查均是因为在涉案虚拟货币司法处置过程中存在公安机关和处置公司之间的非法利益输送问题。

四是处置的虚拟货币究竟价值几何,缺少权威意见。司法鉴定、司法审计意见等材料是刑事证据的基本形式之一,但是在涉虚拟货币类案件中很少看到它们的身影。那么一个刑事案件中一个涉案比特币为什么会被定价为49万人民币,而不是50万?(如果是诈骗罪,这就关涉到被告人未来究竟是被判10年以上,还是10年以下,可谓生死攸关)为什么依据币安交易所的某段时间交易均价,而不是欧意?(欧意内心OS:我有很差吗?)或者为什么不依据全球前十大交易所的交易均价?

这还只是刘律随意提到的四个问题,现实中作为刑辩律师阅卷、辩护时,往往会发现更多的问题。以上种种问题,构成当下涉案虚拟货币司法处置的困境。

?code=NjEyZTA4OGFmYjU5ZjNmNjRhNjUyYWZmNDcyYzE2ZTlfdzhlbzJDbDZyRE1ZWWZCbExzRldNbDdjSG5FM3MwY0RfVG9rZW46UFd0MmJqak9HbzlSTk94dDhRMmNqUHE1bm9oXzE3MTAwNTE1ODI6MTcxMDA1NTE4Ml9WNA

那么,将虚拟货币列入《刑事诉讼法》能否解决以上提到或未提到的种种问题呢?刘律的观点是:有一定作用,但是很难彻底解决。尤其是在监管者对虚拟货币总体上持负面态度时,虚拟货币列入法律的想法完全就是一厢情愿的呓语。

只有未来大众和监管者都接受了虚拟货币的存在时,它才有机会进入法律、法规(无论是正面(比如作为公民合法的虚拟资产),还是负面角色(比如作为刑事涉案资产))。但如今它在监管者看来,几个部委开个会,出一个《通知》《纪要》等就足以配得上虚拟货币的地位啦。就像是它只配《红楼梦》中宝玉神游太虚境中看到的“金陵十二钗副册、又副册”,想要进入“正册”那是万万不能的,至少当下是不能的。

此恨绵绵无绝期。


Lawyer Liu Zheng, the author, saw today that several WeChat groups were turning to the proposal of a representative of the National People's Congress to include virtual currency in Article of the Criminal Procedure Law. The revised statement is that the public security organs of the people's procuratorate can inquire and freeze the deposits, remittances, bonds, stocks, funds, shares of virtual currency and other property of criminal suspects according to the requirements of investigating crimes. Relevant units and individuals should cooperate with the list of contents that added virtual currency before the revision. It seems that this juxtaposition is to store virtual currency and legal currency. However, under the existing virtual currency supervision policy in Chinese mainland, Mr. Liu's first reaction is how this is possible. After carefully studying the specific report of the legal network on the proposal of the NPC deputies, Mr. Liu probably understands that the background of the proposal is the judicial disposal of the virtual currency involved. Friends who are familiar with Mr. Liu should know that I have done a lot of research on this before and have written several articles to inform ten ministries about further preventing and disposing of the speculation risk of virtual currency transactions. Under the supervision policy represented by the notice and other documents, all the exchange business of virtual currency and legal tender in China is illegal financial activities, which of course also includes the public security organs or so-called virtual currency disposal companies to exchange virtual currency and legal tender, even if this disposal is to promote the handling of criminal cases, so when the public security organs are involved in the investigation of criminal cases, the virtual currency involved, whether as a criminal tool or illegal income, is public security. Organs always entrust a third-party disposal company to realize the virtual currency involved in the case, so as to avoid directly violating the provisions of the notice. Of course, third-party disposal companies will not foolishly just get on the horse and do it themselves. They will often entrust overseas disposal companies to dispose of the virtual currency involved in the case, and then return the funds to China through legal or even illegal channels and then transfer them to the financial accounts of public security organs as assets involved in criminal cases. Compared with traditional criminal cases, The property of a case is usually auctioned by the court executive board at the court stage. In criminal cases involving virtual currency, based on the particularity of virtual currency, the current judicial practice is to generally realize the operation in the investigation stage and then transfer the assets after the realization of virtual currency to the court for disposal. The reason is that Liu Law will not go into details here. Interested friends can see these articles for details. There are at least the following problems in Liu Law's disposal of property at the public security investigation stage: First, the legal and regulatory basis. Although the provisions of the public security organs allow some special properties involved in the case to be disposed of first, such as the revision of some provisions on the management of properties involved in the case of public security organs, Article stipulates that bonds, stocks, fund shares and other properties with large market price fluctuations, bills of exchange, promissory notes and checks whose validity period is about to expire, and other rights holders can explicitly sell the proceeds from the auction according to law with their own written consent or application and the approval of the main person in charge of the public security organs at or above the county level, and deposit them into the only compliant account of the unit in virtual currency. However, it is in line with the fact that the market price fluctuates greatly, but virtual currency is not property such as bonds, stocks, funds, shares, remittances and other vouchers. According to the national regulatory policy, virtual currency can be called virtual goods at most. Moreover, China does not recognize the legal status of virtual currency exchanges. It is illegal financial activities to set up virtual currency exchanges in China or provide services to overseas virtual currency exchanges in China. Logically or legally, the virtual currency involved cannot be Second, there is no proper system arrangement for compulsory measures such as checking and freezing the virtual currency involved in the case. Because of its particularity, the virtual currency stored in the wallet can only be opened by the private key, while the virtual currency stored in the exchange often needs the cooperation of overseas exchanges to freeze. The usual practice of the public security at present is to monitor the criminal suspect's designated residence and make the criminal suspect repent and take the initiative to submit the private key and match it through the tireless legal education and painstaking teaching of the case handlers. Will transferring virtual money into the wallet controlled by investigators involve extorting a confession by torture? Liu Law's own case has not been encountered at present, but we have seen on the Internet that in some cases, the family members or lawyers of the parties claimed that the suspect had been extorted by torture during his residence. Let's assume that it is possible that if the suspect refuses to disclose the private key password of the virtual money wallet involved, no matter what measures are taken, what should he do at this time? Third, the current virtual money involved is realized. The mode is easy to be unsupervised, which leads to the transfer of interests. Liu Law did not start writing an article. It is easy to be blocked. It only mentions that a public security leader in Yancheng, Jiangsu Province and a virtual currency judicial disposal company in Zhejiang Province were investigated because of the illegal transfer of interests between the public security organs and the disposal company in the process of judicial disposal of virtual currency involved. Fourth, the value geometry of the virtual currency disposed lacks authoritative opinions. Judicial expertise and judicial audit opinions are one of the basic forms of criminal evidence, but in the case of virtual currency involved. They are rarely seen in quasi-currency cases, so why is a bitcoin involved in a criminal case priced at RMB 10,000 instead of RMB 10,000? If it is fraud, it is related to whether the defendant will be sentenced to more than years or less in the future. It can be said that it is a matter of life and death. Why is it based on the average transaction price of the Currency Exchange for a certain period of time instead of Europe, Italy, Europe and Italy? Or why is it not based on the average transaction price of the top ten exchanges in the world? These are just four questions that Liu Law casually mentioned. In reality, as a criminal defense lawyer, you will often find more problems. The above problems constitute the dilemma of judicial disposal of virtual currency involved in the case. So can the inclusion of virtual currency in the criminal procedure law solve the problems mentioned above or not? Liu Law's point of view has a certain effect, but it is difficult to completely solve it, especially when the regulators take a negative attitude towards virtual currency as a whole. The idea of including virtual currency in the law is completely wishful thinking. Only the future public and supervision can do it. Only when people accept the existence of virtual currency can it have the opportunity to enter laws and regulations, whether it is positive or negative, such as being a legal virtual asset of citizens or an asset involved in criminal cases, but now it is enough for regulators to hold a meeting of several ministries and commissions and issue a notice summary, just like it is only worthy of the status of virtual currency, just like it is only worthy of the supplementary book of Jinling Twelve Women seen in the dream of Red Mansions, and it is absolutely impossible to enter the official book, at least not for the moment, while this unending sorrow goes on and on for ever. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

文字格式和图片示例

注册有任何问题请添加 微信:MVIP619 拉你进入群

弹窗与图片大小一致 文章转载注明 网址:https://netpsp.com/?id=57146

美化布局示例

欧易(OKX)最新版本

【遇到注册下载问题请加文章最下面的客服微信】永久享受返佣20%手续费!

APP下载   全球官网 大陆官网

币安(Binance)最新版本

币安交易所app【遇到注册下载问题请加文章最下面的客服微信】永久享受返佣20%手续费!

APP下载   官网地址

火币HTX最新版本

火币老牌交易所【遇到注册下载问题请加文章最下面的客服微信】永久享受返佣20%手续费!

APP下载   官网地址
可以去百度分享获取分享代码输入这里。
声明

1.本站遵循行业规范,任何转载的稿件都会明确标注作者和来源;2.本站的原创文章,请转载时务必注明文章作者和来源,不尊重原创的行为我们将追究责任;3.作者投稿可能会经我们编辑修改或补充。

发表评论
平台列表
美化布局示例

欧易(OKX)

  全球官网 大陆官网

币安(Binance)

  官网

火币(HTX)

  官网

Gate.io

  官网

Bitget

  官网

deepcoin

  官网
关注我们

若遇到问题,加微信客服---清歌

搜索
排行榜
扫一扫,加我为微信好友加我为微信好友