ERC404 的爆火让 NFT 再次伟大

The author's article only serves as a technical analysis and does not constitute any investment suggestions. Please read carefully what is a binary coin? Generally speaking, it refers to the homogeneity of the original chain or similar agreements. Common ones, such as Isograph, refer to the non-homogeneity that conforms to the agreement. For example, domestic digital collection platforms, such as Boring Ape, such as the model assets issued by Whale Exploration, are also considered to be maps and have their own limitations. For example, some of them are relatively liquid, but they are rare and unique in their own value, but they are often very poor in liquidity, and most of them are blue chips. The depth of liquidity of a project or a project focused on the floor price refers to the specification that it will be mixed in some way. We think that for example, a project that supports the duality of graphics and coins should be homogeneous and non-homogeneous. It can not only enjoy the high liquidity brought by it, but also realize the rarity and uniqueness, which has hype value. But does such a thing really exist? The price is linked to its rarity. Why can it be homogeneous? Pandora's Box was opened during the Spring Festival in 2008. The experimental agreement named and its first project, the voice of rapid fire and criticism, and the voice of praise have created a unique way of mixing pictures and coins. The simple description is that if you buy, you will automatically get the balance, and if you don't have enough money, you will automatically destroy it. If you buy it in your wallet, you will automatically sell it in the same way, and you will automatically reduce it. Use a picture to express the current rules of the mixed logic game. The following are the current Pandora's Box. They have different rarity. According to the contract realization, we can calculate the probability to realize a new version. The code is not well written or very satisfactory, but it solves the most important problem of how to realize the comparison of the three protocols of the interface between and in a contract. By shielding the irrelevant parts of the two interface definitions and comparing which interfaces are cross or conflict, we can find that the four conflicting interfaces are all transfer-related, and the semantics of the last parameter in the contract is the limit, while the semantics of the parameter in the contract is the number represented. In the implementation of the contract, the semantics of this parameter is modified to The method of distinguishing when it is yes is also very simple. According to the size of the value, similar to what we say in the world, the actual corresponding value is yes, so it is generally an increasing integer from the beginning. Although it is an integer, the actual order of magnitude is different. For example, the contract records how many times it has been recorded. If the current value is less than or equal to it, it is considered yes. Otherwise, is this logic useful? Is it reasonable? Besides, the logic is not to transfer, but to destroy the original account and cast the new account. The advantage of the game is to match the liquidity and realize it simply by thinking about the situation of insufficient transfer, but it has brought exaggerated consumption. With reference to the transfer of this transaction, it has produced a new narrative and new opportunities, and the gameplay has brought several hidden rules. The existing price is not too different from the existing price, and only one situation is collected. In other words, the only way to replace the low rarity with the high rarity is to keep the total supply of transactions as the most represented. If I master the magic of casting a red Pandora's Box stably and then sell it at a high price in the market, can I arbitrage the price indefinitely? These data provide the theoretical basis for arbitrage. The floor price bought in the past week is greater than the above data, and there is no rarity of screening. In this case, the profit from wear and tear is subtracted. Refer to the invisible rules above for reference if we can do it forever. Far from being a red Pandora with high rarity, is it more profitable? Let's take a look at the contract and see how the random generation in many works is realized. The rarity achieved by reading the contract is pseudo-random and similar to the project we realized before, so the rarity of the next one is completely predictable. We can speculate purely locally through a script and verify that this logic is completely correct, that is, we speculate on the future life. If we don't consider the liquidity reduction of the current project, it will be a very popular financial behavior summary and not the first agreement to explore liquidity. The project has been fragmented for a long time, including an innovation, but why is everyone in such a high mood this time? I think it's a good name, but the implementation of the first version of the contract is very poor, so the official is also actively promoting the version community to have a third party to achieve it, and what's more, a new agreement is called naming genus. Sex is full of liquidity, and the story of obvious decline during the Chinese New Year may soon come to a big conclusion. The current version has countless defects enough to crush it, and the liquidity has also dropped significantly. But at present, there are more and more project parties trying the model, and one of them can be counted. I believe that there will be more solutions to the liquidity problem in the future and it will really bring the next one. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=57076