新的ERC：新的未来

Author Li Hua's original text was published in the last round of bear market. People's doubts are whether the blockchain is useful. Then the power we saw and the vitality that came with it have been answered positively. In this round of cycle, many people are deeply involved, and many people once again have doubts about what else the blockchain can be used for, not because they are not satisfied, but because the current blockchain is like a dragon with only one wing trapped in a limited site. Only when its other wing also grows will it soar, and only when its other wing also grows can the power of the first wing be truly released. Where will the wing grow? It will not come from the chain level, such as the new chain or the new one. These are the dragon's trunk instead of the dragon's wings. It will come from the application level in the chain, and it will probably come from the application under the new standard and the new agreement instead of the old agreement. Under the premise that everyone has racked their brains to innovate for several years, the old agreement has not. It can bring surprises. In this article, I want to discuss three personal favorite new standards, new protocols and new protocols, which will open up new application directions, and the new application directions may bring non-investment needs and non-financial needs to the blockchain, so that the dragon can grow another wing, which is ugly but has a broad narrative space. This article only discusses the direction that individuals are most interested in, which I call non-human account subjects. The three use cases in this article may be unconstrained, but you see that the destination of aerospace industry is the sea of stars. Before taking us to Mars, it can bring us the air cushion game, the integration of real players and players. It is an open game that I like. Players can resell goods between different cities to make money, but the deserts between cities are full of dangers. At this time, they can go to pubs to find mercenaries to spend money on escort caravans. In traditional games, these can't be real people, and because they are not real people, nothing else grows except players. Lonely players will one day finish all their tasks and leave here. Can a game have a brand-new type of subject or object, which can carry both real people and real people when they go online? Players can operate normally, such as improving skills, building a city when real people go offline, reading fixed data and executing specific programs, and making passive money in other players' real people's real people's models, such as when the mercenary blockchain is the best carrier of this subject, the game characters have accounts, data and property, which can be regarded as independent objects to handle real people's accounts. Users can take over the control right after going online, which does not mean that blockchain has solved all the problems of real players and integration, but they have opened a possible path. As a heavy gamer, I often ask myself whether blockchain can make the game more fun, and list countless answers. After deduction, almost all the answers have been crossed out. Looking for the road on the Internet is an answer that has not been crossed out, and human beings are an arrogant creature. We regard everything as ourselves. However, technology is not a subsidiary of human beings. When we look at the science and technology tree, we will find that it is another powerful evolutionary force. It has its own place to go. If arrogance in the past only made human beings miss a happier lifestyle, Levi Strauss may bring a racial tragedy in the future. Maybe we need to take a step forward and regard it as a subject equal to human beings. Then where will it be? They will put themselves in a place where the control belongs to others. On private servers? How should they manage and use their own assets? The answer may be a public chain or a consensus data subject. The subject owns an account instead of an account holder. Take a step back. The role of the game, especially the narrative adopted by the role agent on a large scale based on reinforcement learning, is that they all need to own an account. The digital future of digitized people will generate a somewhat similar thing in the digital space through data collection and training. The only question is whether it is one in ten thousand similar or whether it can be regarded as a digital self. In view of human's pursuit of eternal life, it will be a common thing to train the digital avatar, so that the digital avatar will always exist and give it a physical body after the technology matures. The life maintenance of the digital avatar is a problem, especially after the prototype dies, and it is unreliable to give it to others, including relatives, because it takes a long time to cross over. The best strategy is to leave it enough money to maintain itself. In this case, it needs a permanent account, the account can not be closed and the assets of the account can be used independently. What can you think of as a solution? If the digital avatar can be regarded as a digital self, it is an equal subject with others, it makes money, it not only maintains but also develops itself, so where does it live, how to achieve independence, or how to make the digital avatar have the highest authority over the digital avatar? The answer is that it is the carrier of independent digital subjects. No matter whether the subject is a game character, an independent or a person's digital avatar, we need to discuss two kinds of shackles that we add to ourselves before discussing, one is about data, and the other is about trust. Blockchain can only handle the boundary of data on the chain, which is regarded as the boundary of blockchain capability. In order to expand this boundary, we will try to upload data in almost every round of development, but both in theory and practice. Meaningful data uplink can't help the blockchain to effectively expand the boundary. We stop here. However, there is a vast space between the data that needs to be processed by the blockchain and the data that doesn't need to be processed by the blockchain at all. Some of their data can be processed by the blockchain to gain the ability of the blockchain, and the other part of their data can be processed by the blockchain to gain the advantage of data processing outside the chain. The boundary of this space is the boundary of the blockchain ability. It may be one of the biggest charms of the blockchain to trust, but it is difficult to achieve it. We often deceive ourselves and equate decentralization with trust. Some decentralization can indeed bring about trust, but others bring about that the centralized object who should be responsible for something escapes their responsibility. In fact, it is similar to the situation of data under the data link in the chain. Some things need to be trusted, while some things need to be trusted to protect rights and interests, and the other part needs to be centralized. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=56390