一文全面读懂比特币Runes协议

The author's translation of bitcoin trading network is more interesting than you think. You may have heard of the idea that it is a popular standard. The idea of realizing the standard at the same client used to publish bitcoin directly responds to the clear demand of the market for bitcoin alternative tokens, and improves and solves many problems raised by the existing peer-to-peer standards. It will publish its token standard when the height of bitcoin is halved in a month, which may greatly increase the bitcoin mine. When they need it most, most speculators are mainly concerned about air-drop mining and know little about the working principle of the agreement. However, if you know a little, let's go deep into the rabbit hole with me and find out the basic difference between operating under the bitcoin model. Most of them know that they are more suitable for Bitcoin than others, which is usually correct, because it is best not to add more episodes to Bitcoin, which will make it more difficult and expensive to run nodes in the past year. The collection of inscriptions has doubled, most of which are useless forever. They are dead coins, and the operation of transferring inscriptions will not produce surplus uselessness. This is a very simple and direct improvement. I understand that the market is not particularly concerned about technological improvement, so I am glad that the market is enthusiastic, even if it is for speculative reasons. I hope that such market sentiment can promote the overall improvement of the network and improve the index problem, which means that your balance is related to. Your bitcoin address is linked, but the situation is that your balance is tied to yours, which means that if you want to get your personal balance, you don't have to verify all the status, you just need to verify what you have and what you used to have, so in theory, you can have a very lightweight client and even combine it with it. This is an interesting technical support. Running a light client on a mobile device has a great impact on the status of the index. Basically, I believe it will allow many users to verify themselves. Our transaction means that the decentralized indexer problem that plagues the ecology has been greatly improved. For end users, the state proof is easier to verify, and it may even be verified on their own lightweight devices or compatible with bitcoin extensions, because it is model-based, which actually makes it very interoperable with many bitcoins, such as lightning networks or state chains like this. Theoretically, the extended solution using bitcoin model will be compatible with the native bit. The cost of coins will be higher and higher. In this case, it may become very expensive to conduct fast transactions directly on Bitcoin. Imagine that it is no longer reasonable to cast or transfer small amounts on the Internet, then the transaction volume of this alternative token will be transferred to other places. The extended solution that is natively compatible with the Bitcoin model will have significant design advantages over the existing extended model, such as the proposed black-and-white module system. In recent years, a crazy idea was put forward to pay your bitcoin transaction fee. In theory, you can let others pay your bitcoin transaction fee in exchange for your theory. If your transaction has two outputs, one of which is bitcoin payment and the other contains one, but anyone can consume it, then someone will pay for the whole transaction in order to get it. In this case, you can trade at a lower cost or even without paying, while others pay for your transaction. This is actually to get your bitcoin transaction. The idea of paying the bill may be classified as a hot topic in the field of bitcoin, which may have some very interesting effects on the incentive mechanism of bitcoin. Crazy ideas, contracts and various contract proposals are gaining more and more support, for example, or these proposals allow users to share and be compatible, and some of them can be used. Let's imagine that even if only one of these concepts can be combined with standards, chewing gum machines are just a rough idea for contracts like this. It is said that users can provide funds for the transfer transaction in advance so that anyone can buy from the contract. There is one input, the first input is the contract, and the second input is the user's payment. We have deleted the signature requirement of the transaction so that anyone can use the following two outputs. The first output is the transfer, and some are sent to the payer. The second output is the recursive contract of the original transaction contract. My language may not be accurate in this way. You can spit it out like a chewing gum machine. If you think the idea of chewing gum machine is cool, then you should get a general understanding of the contracts. I especially recommend it, but maybe you can also visit the page in the beginning. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=53835