Binance与美SEC均反对第三方实体「Eeon」介入双方诉讼案_虚拟币交易所平台,数字货币,NFT

当前位置: > > Binance与美SEC均反对第三方实体「Eeon」介入双方诉讼案 Binance与美SEC均反对第三方实体「Eeon」介入双方诉讼案 2023-07-28 区块律动BlockBeat 来源：区块链网络
BlockBeats 消息，7 月 28 日，据哥伦比亚特区地方法院称，被告 Binance 和原告美国 SEC 均反对第三方实体「Eeon」介入诉讼的请求，因为它未能根据法律达成干预的要求。 Binance 给出了三个理由来驳回 Eeon 的请求：没有得到 SEC 的同意、未能确定自己是真正的利益相关方、未能满足法律规定的干预要求。此外，Eeon 的反诉指控含糊不清，与诉讼无关。 SEC 辩称，Eeon 的诉讼理由未能在联邦法院获得支持。SEC 要求法院驳回请愿，因为《交易法》禁止私人诉讼人干预，参与不会影响诉讼，因为其主张与被告的论点相匹配，并且不符合干预要求。 此前 7 月 15 日，根据提交给哥伦比亚特区地方法院的一份文件，总部位于内华达州的法律实体 Eeon 代表客户提交一份动议，要求参与美 SEC 诉 Binance Holdings 的诉讼。请愿人认为，SEC 和 Binance 的律师代表了他们的利益，没有人试图代表客户发言。Eeon 声称加密货币不是证券，而是商品，因为「它用于个人和家庭使用，我们不会将这些代币视为商业用途。」它补充称，目前没有针对新型商品的监管规定，SEC 对加密货币没有管辖权。

原文链接

: Both the United States and the United States oppose the intervention of a third-party entity in both parties' lawsuits and both the United States oppose the intervention of a third-party entity in both parties' lawsuits. According to the District Court of the District of Columbia, both the defendant and the plaintiff, the United States, oppose the request of a third-party entity to intervene in litigation because it failed to reach an intervention request according to the law, giving three reasons to reject the request, failing to obtain the consent, failing to determine that it is a real stakeholder, and failing to meet the intervention requirements stipulated by law. In addition, the counterclaim charges are vague and irrelevant to the lawsuit, and the reasons for the lawsuit are not supported in the federal court, asking the court to dismiss the petition because the transaction law prohibits private litigants from intervening in the lawsuit, which will not affect the lawsuit because its claims match the defendant's arguments and do not meet the intervention requirements. According to a document submitted to the District Court of the District of Columbia, a legal entity headquartered in Nevada submitted a motion on behalf of its clients, asking the petitioner to participate in the lawsuit in the United States to consider the law of peace. The division represents their interests, and no one tries to speak on behalf of customers, claiming that cryptocurrencies are not securities but commodities, because they are used for personal and family purposes, and we will not regard these tokens as commercial purposes, it added, adding that there are no regulatory provisions for new commodities at present and there is no jurisdiction over cryptocurrencies. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=33151