SocialFi 新贵 xPet: 离伟大临门一脚

Written in front of it is the recent phenomenal online one week, which attracted the capital chain. The user project is still in a very early stage. Many rules are still unclear, and there are still many iterative space projects. Recently, the project side has also acted frequently, and the most concerned and controversial thing is that it directly liquidated the user's deposits on the evening of the month and established a liquidity pool on the Internet. Frankly speaking, the direct liquidation is not very authentic, given that it is a non-liquid currency in theory. Qualifying to participate in the loan, releasing the price without any explanation in advance and directly clearing it can be said that everyone was caught off guard. Users' doubts and concerns about it were not that there was no smoke without fire, but that it was necessary to invest before further information was made clear. Members of the economic model group and others abstracted it and discussed it as an interesting brain game and economic model case in depth. Among them, we think the most interesting thing is how to design the system to move towards a relatively balanced and lasting state. Of course, we are also very concerned about the external value injection of the economic model. It is rare that the design of the economic model and the product form based on plug-ins have achieved a good synergy. At the same time, the economic model of the system is accelerating the operation of the flywheel. The number of convertible tokens is equivalent to the income earned the day before. Combined with the game mechanism, we can deduce the following formula. In summary, we can continue to simply deduce that the power is finally low in the first mining stage. The denominator with a small number of students adds a lot of molecular units, and the income is very high. Assuming that what is generated every day will be exchanged, the liquidity will be extremely lacking, and it will be relatively easy for the project party to control and control. The high income will drive more people to invite others to mine and buy mining machines, and the reward pool will be filled and repeated every day until one day the growth rate drops, and the yield is not enough to attract new people and the capital system to die. From the above path, it can be seen that if the system vitality is to last longer, it is necessary to extend the high income as reasonably as possible. Time corresponds to the formula, that is, try to increase the numerator and decrease the denominator in various ways and see if the relative growth rate of the two can be maintained at a certain level. Increase the molecular protocol and design it as smoothly as possible to attract as many people as possible to join the price. If it can be at a reasonable level, it will help reduce the user's participation threshold, promote the transformation and reduce the denominator. Some mechanism designs mentioned in the white paper will help to achieve this goal, such as pledge interest, increase in-game consumption and queuing black box mechanism functions to be convertible. The business flow income generated by changing the upper limit will also bring positive externalities to the system, which can be used for repurchase and destruction when the yield goes down. From the formula, we have some other thoughts. A stable price may be a better solution. We think that the fluctuating price design may be a trick. Under the current unstable price setting, the user's entry threshold will be significantly improved when it rises sharply, which will undoubtedly hinder more players from entering. If the price is too low, the yield will be unattractive and will enter the spiral. Price stability may be the optimal solution of this system. In addition, because the system has set the daily exit limit, it needs to wait in line. If users spend money to upgrade their computing power indefinitely, their return period will be significantly prolonged if they can't exit smoothly. It is not cost-effective for users. A better strategy is to spend a certain amount of money to upgrade the mining machine to a suitable level, and the amount of cash that needs to be realized every day is close to the level. Therefore, the final distribution of this system will be that the number of users is wider and the reward is relatively flat. The average state is also more conducive to the long-term steady-state product designer's ideal state, which may be exactly the case. From this perspective, the team should not set the admission threshold too high to attract more users. It is imperative to set the attenuation mechanism of computing power. At present, the team seems to have never publicly mentioned a key issue: the factory computing power lacks the attenuation mechanism, and the rate of return will continue to decrease with the infinite expansion of the denominator in the formula over time, thus losing its growth attraction. We tend to think that the subsequent economic model design needs to introduce the attenuation mechanism of the factory to reduce the growth rate of the denominator. Ideally, the project side does not need to be the opponent of inflation, but uses various ways in the toolbox to adjust the numerator and denominator to achieve the goal of system equilibrium. Three dynamic optimal solutions of computing power. When more and more users participate, everyone competes for the production efficiency of the mining machine. However, due to the limited online functions, the competition between users is relatively homogeneous. At present, there is almost only one optimal solution. Pushing forward from the form of the existing game, we can imagine some evolutionary possibilities. The platform can constantly increase the gameplay and exert control in the game, such as making pets sick and hungry, and even increasing the consumption scene between pets. By introducing these new mechanisms, the mining efficiency is damaged, so that the competition between players is more non-standard computing power, and there will never be an optimal solution or a homogeneous optimal state. In this way, users will be interested in constantly exploring how to achieve the optimal solution and merge. In the process, the recharge is improved, and the vitality of the game is constantly renewed because the project party is constantly creating new demands. Fourth, our confusion is that the function distinction between the current sum and the current sum is unclear. The value of the two is maintained in the venue because there is a certain discount outside the restricted venue, which causes our confusion. If the exchange rate is limited, why do we need the design of double tokens? In addition, the white paper clearly mentions that the number of convertible tokens is equivalent to the income earned the previous day. After inquiry, the contract address is indeed transferred to the current contract address. The cumulative number has been close to 10,000 pieces, and only about 10,000 pieces have been exchanged, and there are still nearly 10,000 pieces waiting in the queue. If there are no other exchange restrictions, there are plenty of 10,000 pieces but they are not given to the holders, which damages the rights and interests of users. The queuing mechanism that is automatically triggered is also very puzzling. It seems that there is no regularity in viewing the queue from browser data. This seems to be a bad situation. The team needs to work harder on the implementation of code engineering, taking into account the online time of the project. There is only one week, and it may take time to improve or the product is not yet in a complete state. We will continue to pay attention to the progress of the project and the iteration of the economic model. Welcome to exchange views with us. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=62577