Brc20分叉？Unisat和Domo一场“速度”和“稳定性"的拔河
作者：Bob Bodily, PhD 来源：X，@BobBodily
一、“元元”协议索引带来的争端
首先，对BRC-20进行简要概述：
BRC-20目前是最成功的比特币可交换代币协议。在过去一年中，其交易量已达数亿甚至数十亿美元。虽然它并不完美（使用效率低下的编码、增加了未使用交易输出（UTXO）集的负担、功能有限），但它非常容易部署和铸造代币，并在几乎所有区块链上引发了对加密世界的影响。
接下来，简要介绍技术原理：
BRC-20是建立在Ordinals元协议之上的元协议。这意味着Ordinals将比特币用作完整的数据可用性层，并使用离链索引器确定元协议状态。而BRC-20则将Ordinals协议作为完整的数据可用性层，并使用离链索引器确定元协议状态。这意味着BRC-20实际上是一个"元元"协议，因为它是建立在Ordinals之上的。
在Ord上构建BRC-20的复杂性：
Ordinals协议的技术规范在过去一年中一直在变化。Ord是一个全新的协议，因此它经常发生变化。当你在Ord上构建一个代币标准时，你为你的协议增加了额外的风险，因为你有一个不断变化的协议依赖。
这就是Ord 0.8.0和Ord 0.9.0发生的情况。不同版本的Ord以稍微不同的方式跟踪铭文，这意味着BRC-20索引器根据是否构建在0.8.0还是0.9.0上会报告错误的余额。当然，这是不可取的。
二、unisat VS domo(LF1)
L1F解决方案
Layer 1 Foundation (@L1Fxyz)的解决方案是将Ord协议版本冻结为0.9.0，以防止将来发生类似问题。因此，即使我们有额外的“被诅咒”的铭文类别，通过保持所有基于0.9.0版本构建的索引器，您可以避免跨版本不兼容性。这不是一个永久解决方案，但目前它非常有效地保持了BRC-20的稳定性。
Unisat希望推动协议发展
首先，Unisat引入了黑/白模块系统。这使得在BRC-20上构建的人们（如Unisat）可以在黑模块（在主协议中不进行索引的临时位置）中引入新功能。您可以将您的代币转入黑模块，但在获得批准之前无法取出，就像比特币空间链（单向桥接）一样。然后，近日，Unisat发布了他们希望将BRC-20索引器下的Ord版本升级到最新版本（jubilee之后）。jubilee是Ord的官方发布版本，在那之后我们将不再有“被诅咒”的Ordinals（所有铭文将永远有正数）。
辩论的关键点：如何升级BRC-20
升级BRC-20索引器下的Ord版本实际上是一个非常好的主意。Ord协议将更加稳定，我们将不再有“被诅咒”的Ordinals，不用再担心余额不匹配等问题。
Unisat希望尽快推出这个升级，这是非常合理的，因为Unisat是一家初创公司。初创公司没有时间坐等。你必须奔跑以找到产品市场适应性并为用户建设。
L1F希望推迟升级，因为如果我们匆忙行事，可能会出现额外的错误。Best in slot和其他人已经发现了一些协议错误。这是有道理的，因为L1F是一个旨在保护协议的基金会，所以他们认可较慢、更有目的性的协议路径来进行升级。
有些人认为这是Unisat团队试图控制协议的权力斗争。而其他人认为L1F只是试图控制应该更多市场驱动的协议。
三、Bob的看法
由于BRC-20协议的巨大成功，我们不能再快速行动了。BRC-20的初创阶段已经过去了。BRC-20是一个绝对庞大的协议（总锁定价值、用户、基础设施、钱包、市场），在此后不应该再快速行动。我喜欢L1F的方法。Domo一直认识到协议的稳定性的重要性（自创始以来，BRC-20几乎没有发生变化），这是一个优势。更易于整合。更易于构建。等等。我们需要去中心化、审议和缓慢移动的共识和妥协来推动BRC-20协议的变革。
The dispute caused by the author's source meta-protocol index is briefly summarized. At present, the most successful bitcoin exchangeable token protocol has reached hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars in the past year. Although it is not perfect, inefficient coding increases the burden of unused transaction output sets, but its function is limited, it is very easy to deploy and cast tokens and has caused influence on the encrypted world in almost all blockchain. Next, the technical principle is briefly introduced based on meta-protocol. This means that bitcoin is used as a complete data availability layer and the off-chain indexer is used to determine the status of the meta-protocol, while the protocol is used as a complete data availability layer and the off-chain indexer is used to determine the status of the meta-protocol. This means that it is actually a meta-protocol, because it is built on it. The technical specification of the complex protocol has been changing in the past year, so it is a brand-new protocol, so it often changes when you build a token standard on the Internet. Your protocol adds extra risk because you have a constantly changing protocol dependency, which means that different versions track the inscription in a slightly different way from what happened, which means that indexers will report the wrong balance according to whether they are built or not. Of course, this is not desirable. The second solution is to freeze the protocol version to prevent similar problems from happening in the future, so even if we have additional cursed inscription categories, you can keep all indexers built based on the version. Cross-version incompatibility can be avoided. This is not a permanent solution, but it has effectively maintained the stability at present, hoping to promote the development of the protocol. First, the black-and-white module system was introduced, which enables people who build on the Internet to introduce new functions in the temporary location where the black module is not indexed in the main protocol. You can transfer your tokens to the black module, but you can't take them out before getting approval, just like the one-way bridge of the bitcoin space chain, and then recently released what they want to index. After the version is upgraded to the latest version, it is the official release version. After that, we will no longer have all the cursed inscriptions, and there will always be a positive debate. The key point of how to upgrade and upgrade the version under the indexer is actually a very good idea. The agreement will be more stable. We will no longer have the cursed ones, and we don't have to worry about the balance mismatch. We hope to launch this upgrade as soon as possible. This is very reasonable because it is a startup company and it has no time to wait for you to run to find the product market. Adaptability of the field and hope to delay the upgrade for users, because if we act in a hurry, there may be additional mistakes and others have found some protocol errors, which makes sense. Because it is a foundation aimed at protecting the protocol, they recognize the slower and more purposeful protocol path to upgrade. Some people think that this is a power struggle for the team to control the protocol, while others think that it is just trying to control Protocol III, which should be more market-driven. Due to the great success of the protocol. The initial stage that we can't act quickly has passed. It is an absolutely huge agreement that always locks in the value of the user infrastructure wallet market. After that, we should not act quickly. My favorite method has always recognized the importance of the stability of the agreement, which has hardly changed since its inception. This is an advantage that it is easier to integrate and build, and so on. We need decentralized deliberation and slow-moving consensus and compromise to promote the change of the agreement. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台
注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群
打开微信扫一扫
添加客服
进入交流群
1.本站遵循行业规范，任何转载的稿件都会明确标注作者和来源；2.本站的原创文章，请转载时务必注明文章作者和来源，不尊重原创的行为我们将追究责任；3.作者投稿可能会经我们编辑修改或补充。
