Metis vs Espresso：哪种去中心化排序器代表未来？

On the one hand, the author's independent researcher comes from the construction of decentralization in spite of all difficulties, and on the other hand, it is based on the modular sharing scheme. Some people may ask what is the difference between the self-operated store that tries to decentralize the sorter and the outsourcing module. In my opinion, decentralization of the sorter is only the premise of basic molding. The real challenge lies in the construction of decentralized ecosystem. Next, I will talk about my understanding. Recently, the decentralization process is being promoted, and community testing is also in full swing. At one time, the main network was raised to the point where it was actually just a stress test at the decentralized technical level to ensure the stable operation after it was officially launched. For example, the multi-rotation mechanism, the design of punishment for single evil, the problem of miners' ecological participation and so on, introduced the right to block, and a pool node needed 10,000 blocks in turn. The higher participation threshold ensured the node's operational ability and repair ability when there was a special communication situation, and also deterred the possibility of single evil at the same time. The community stress test was launched on the online test network. After that, the community stress test was launched in February. At present, the test network has carried out sequencing and rotation for more than 10,000 transactions for many times, so as to test the stability of the rotation mechanism and pave the way for the decentralization of the official main online line. If centralized, it can be clamped by arbitrary sorting, but in the decentralized environment, an independent node is needed to monitor the sorting and blocking behavior. There are special nodes to conduct sampling inspection on the generated blocks to prevent the transaction order from being changed, but only by random inspection, supervision and punishment. More or less passive in the late stage of confrontation, the node can completely become a similar special pipeline. The ecological landing agreement of pledge mining is about to go online in ecology. Its goal is to solve the circulation and application problems of miners in the whole decentralized economy after mining. Obviously, it is the main source of output. Whether miners are willing to pledge lending mining is very important for the subsequent development of the whole ecology. In short, the technical problem of decentralization is not complicated and rare, but it is a set of stability behind it. Decentralized ecological construction support benefit distribution and incentive model should talk about technical issues, which are just the tip of the iceberg of decentralization. A series of integrated services and experiences around market ecological operation users are the highlight of decentralization project. The challenges existing in decentralization promotion are described above, and the sharing scheme based on this is easy to understand. Simply put, it is equivalent to providing a modular sharing component interspersed with a preprocessing process. The original user calls and requests to send. The trade fair will be submitted directly to the processing center, and now it can be processed in batches through the sharing center, and then the status will be returned to the pledge system equivalent to a set of rights and interests certification system to ensure decentralization and the design of the corresponding reward and punishment mechanism, and it is highly probable that it will cooperate with the outsourcing company of Ethereum to provide a security consensus. In addition, its equipped functions are also a highlight. Interestingly, if a cross-chain demand submitted by users is shared theoretically, In order to realize the transaction state transition in the environment, so as to reduce the transaction loss of cross-chain submission state and main network interaction, the light imagination space will be great. In short, the method of summation is similar to abstracting the decentralized demand that we all need into a kind of shared sorter commodity, and continuously infiltrating into the ecology in a modular and highly adaptive way. This is a clever approach based on the modular idea, which is bound to attract a large number of one-click chain demand because of its advantages of low cost, high speed and efficiency, but in my opinion, modularity is a double-edged sword. Moderate modularity will greatly reduce the development cost, but if it is excessive, it will lead to the lack of source vitality in the subsequent ecological development. The lightweight nature of modular components can help developers to quickly start the chain at low cost, and the number and change speed of the chain will also accelerate when the capacity and sorter become outsourced goods. I wrote earlier that when the number of projects emerges in batches, the comprehensive soft power such as brand market ecology will become the core. Will one be provided by Ethereum at that time? Is there an independent and reliable decentralization? The ecological landing with mature, stable and growth potential is the key component. Modularization will accelerate the hierarchical differentiation of the market. The head and the middle and tail will take completely different paths, but modularity can be used to drive its strategic landing ability. If the future system is outsourced after outsourcing, a competitive card will be outsourced. Only when the market and operation and maintenance have a paradox, it is easy to understand how to collect ecological projects if the core tax collection rights are given to outsourcing fees. How to encourage and support will have a series of follow-up operation and maintenance problems, which are very similar to an empty shelf. In fact, it lacks an independent decentralized economic framework, and its market ecology is difficult to be done. For example, if you want to build a 100-meter building and give up the steel frame structure, try using the mold again. Of course, I don't deny the potential variable space brought by such modular paradigms to the whole society and ecology. They have lowered the technical threshold. In order to make the market ecological volume very large, more innovative subjects will enrich the market, and some high-quality projects will be rolled out. There must be a difference in value and significance. In the end, the super economy that can continue to bring users' project funds and other effective expansion to the main network will survive faster. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=61110