高性能链上的 DeFi 机会

Due to the growth, the Ethereum Ecology is still the battlefield of most choices. However, the recent success with other high-performance chains shows that they will play an important role in the development. However, the difference between high-performance chains and Ethereum may be that experienced builders in Ethereum Ecology cannot fully understand it. I will discuss the four most important technical differences related to the project. The builders who understand these characteristics of high-performance chains will be able to grasp them in the familiar Ethereum playground. A decisive feature of the high-performance chain of opportunity throughput realized by the method is extremely high. This technical improvement has unlocked a series of applications that cannot be realized on the main network of Ethereum. It is extremely difficult to realize rapid confirmation in the current Ethereum, because not only the time of proof generation and fraud proof dispute, but also the final confirmation in seconds on the main network. Therefore, at present, the high-performance chain is the only feasible solution to realize the complete order book on the chain. By using the dynamic parallel method of technology, the newer ones are available. Ability to minimize conflicts and maximize throughput. In order to fully chain the order book, it must not only be able to support the transfer of assets between transaction settlement wallets, but also be able to support the matching engine where traders bid. The latter is more difficult to be hosted on the chain because the order book must absorb a lot of junk information. Although it needs better liquidity and throughput than the order book, it does not need to be passive, so it provides a more capital-efficient market structure for transactions. There is another opportunity for new projects, although the spot is available. Assets in the order book are priced, but those with synthetic derivatives usually need external infrastructure to provide prices, that is, Oracle machines. Although high-performance Oracle machines are emerging, many traditional Oracle machines can't meet the low-delay demand of confirmation time within seconds of high-performance chain. The lower cost, high throughput and low delay have many advantages for application builders in high-performance chain, especially aggregators. Aggregators obtain the best prices from various liquidity sources on the chain or even under the chain, but because of Ethereum owners, The high and higher delayed prices on the Internet can usually only be retrieved from a single or offline source. However, the advantages of low cost and low delay on the high-performance chain enable the aggregator to find the best price of assets in different liquidity places. In other words, the aggregator can exchange tokens on one route, but if another route provides a better price, it can choose to exchange them again on another route or through a more complicated route, so the price of the aggregator is higher on the high-performance chain than on the main network of Ethereum. The more competitive story is very telling. The leading aggregator controls about the transaction flow, which is in sharp contrast with the main network of Ethereum after filtering out the robot. In the main network of Ethereum, a large number of transaction flows are still carried out through the front end, and the order flow controlled by multiple aggregators is not exceeded by a single front end control, which means that liquidity and order flow will be naturally decoupled in the high-performance chain. Aggregators will always obtain the optimal price for an exchange in multiple places, which introduces a natural incentive, that is, Don't build your own liquidity because it may not provide the best price liquidity source. For example, order books can try to build their own proprietary order flow, but they may not be able to compete with the leading aggregators in price. In addition, the progress of asset bridge infrastructure and intention-based protocols makes it possible for a higher level to appear. Cross-chain aggregators of high-performance chains are increasingly distributed in different architectures and completely different from Ethereum ecology with activities. A single cross-chain aggregator can It is very promising, so the aggregator on the high-performance chain is also a huge opportunity for the verifier to choose. In order to support the extremely high performance chain, they compromise decentralization in their consensus agreement. They can achieve higher scalability by not broadcasting to the whole large-scale node network, and effectively improve the transaction propagation speed as part of their consensus agreement. Many high-performance chains use deterministic leader schedules. This is a set of predefined verifiers who are responsible for the handover in the block. It is easy to sort, so the transaction sorting is extremely dependent on the verifier who is selected as the leader, because they are in an exclusive and established position, which is completely different from Ethereum. The verifier of Ethereum is a leader or representative selected in a pseudo-random way, but the result of the deterministic leader schedule is that some verifiers can build more blocks and get greater rewards, which is self-reinforcing. These verifiers usually get more rights and interests. In addition, in view of the higher requirements for state access, High-performance chains, such as high parallelism, usually have higher hardware requirements, which means that the entry threshold for verifiers is higher. In the form of upfront cost, this dynamic has created a series of advantages for extensive pledge, especially for liquid pledge tokens. Although the choice of verifiers in Ethereum is very important, it usually does not have much impact on the overall pledge yield. In essence, some liquid tokens that can get the best verifiers can gain structural advantages through higher yield. One opportunity is that the high-performance chain can also try the shared security re-pledge layer similar to that of Ethereum, so that the project with access to the best verifier can further improve the output through re-pledge. The building process of building blocks varies from chain to chain, but in a broad sense, there is a very big structural difference between the high-performance chain and the main network of Ethereum, which has a great impact. It may be a challenge to verify the transaction by booking the leader's schedule or entrusting, and the FIFO model is sometimes necessary. Asking the searcher to send junk transactions to the chain in order to try to include these transactions first, instead of packing and sorting the transactions in an orderly way. Different fee market designs, especially the local fee market, also mean that priority fees do not always increase the chances of transactions being included. These architectures make it challenging to execute strategies such as sandwich attacks. In addition, some chains, especially those without public memory pools, make it more difficult for external searchers to retrieve transactions and sort them to execute strategies such as pipelines. Streaming and parallel blockchains can destroy sandwich attacks by randomly reordering transactions before parallel processing, so the opportunities on high-performance chains are different in structure. The subtle differences in blockchain architectures usually have a great impact on, for example, the auction of block construction on the Internet is still a huge opportunity for builders. These architectures have created opportunities for new infrastructure, but the theme is still under study, but it has not been understood by everyone as in the main network of Ethereum. Most of the high-performance chain ecosystems are still in the very early stage and usually follow the development path of Ethereum rudely. 比特币今日价格行情网_okx交易所app_永续合约_比特币怎么买卖交易_虚拟币交易所平台

注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群

文章转载注明 网址：https://netpsp.com/?id=60093